|
Sorry, but that is not good enough. If the article is not complete then it is not ready to be published. And if I cannot run the code that is in the download then that is not enough either. And the iPython link still does not work, and you still have not explained what it is for.
|
|
|
|
|
Article[^] has popped up again for a third time unmodified. He is not getting the message so I have added feedback for him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
He's quite persistent I have to say, it's locked for editing by him at the moment.
|
|
|
|
|
Article is already gone, user on #9
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
modified 15-Sep-17 6:11am.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spammer terminated.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
|
Look one thread down.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
We posted pretty much at the same time...
|
|
|
|
|
Not Spam, but posting a short story as a non solution (#3) by Member 13410801
At the moment I have reported the answer for not a solution. For the user...
I would go for troll, and you?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
modified 16-Sep-17 4:09am.
|
|
|
|
|
|
.
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
Spammer: Dharmendra Singh - Professional Profile[^]
Spam: Latest Messages[^]
Joined today, and his first post contains an extremely-badly mangled site-driving link.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
modified 14-Sep-17 23:17pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Member 13409901 - Professional Profile[^]
Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning
modified 14-Sep-17 23:18pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not happy with this one: C# Design Pattern 1 - Singleton Pattern[^]
From this: JamesChen777 - Professional Profile[^]
As Kewin Rausch - @0x7c00 - noticed, the code is very, very much the same as MSDN sample: Implementing Singleton in C#[^] and even in the same order, with pretty-much-pointless comments added, and some comments around it. And if I remember right, when this was first posted, it was rejected as pretty much just a code dump, defended as "it's part one of a series I'm writing".
Plagiarised? I think so, but ... your thoughts, people?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
modified 16-Sep-17 6:22am.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks to have this pointed out... I did not know if it was worth to open a discussion here, but what he is writing about is really basic and already noted less or more anywhere.
MSDN documentation about that singleton stuff is also marked as "no more maintained", just to give it and "age", and the Interlocked solution has been posted by various social forums lot of time ago, as I already said on the comments.
Honestly it seems like an aggregation of documentation rather than an Article.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*****************[^] by crystalday - Professional Profile[^]
Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning
modified 14-Sep-17 23:19pm.
|
|
|
|
|