|
Hi i developed a tool which allows you to download whole the source code from microsoft at once.
You don't need VS2008 to download and debug the source code. You can use VS2005 to debug the source code also.
Just grab your copy of MassDownloader From NetMassDownloader.
You can contact me via keremskusmezer@gmail.com for any questions.
|
|
|
|
|
I feel I must 5 vote you to counterbalance the 1s.
|
|
|
|
|
There are so many '1' votes that the message has accumulated that our '5s' seem to be daunted.
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
Personal Homepage
Tech Gossips
A pessimist sees only the dark side of the clouds, and mopes; a philosopher sees both sides, and shrugs; an optimist doesn't see the clouds at all - he's walking on them. --Leonard Louis Levinson
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I've the following code that runs in a timer function every second. OnTimedEvent() is a timer delegate that is invoked by Windows timer every second. It uses MFC/Windows SDK. It sets the processor priority for the thread that is running this code.
void CPci1553::OnTimedEvent( Object^ source, ElapsedEventArgs^ e )
{
//set the timer thread affinity to second process and set it to higher priority
SYSTEM_INFO info;
//get the configuration information of computer
GetSystemInfo(&info);
//if the system has more than one processor, use the last processor for TOD thread
//set the thread affinity to second processor
if(info.dwNumberOfProcessors > 1)
SetThreadIdealProcessor(GetCurrentThread(),info.dwNumberOfProcessors-1);
}
I need to upgrage this code for .NET using C++/CLI. I tried to use .NET functions like "System::Environment::ProcessorCount" to processor count in on the system, "System.Diagnostics.ProcessThread.IdealProcessor" to set the processory priority for the thread, "System.Threading.Thread.CurrentThread" to get the current running thread for this code. But the problem is "System.Diagnostics.ProcessThread" is unmanaged thread and "System.Threading.Thread" is managed thread. I don't know how to mix these two. Pls. help me with this code.
Thanks
Ram
|
|
|
|
|
I'm using System.Net.NetworkInformation.NetworkInterface to get the information about network connections to my PC. But this class seems to be 'Read only', i.e., I can view the information about network connection. For example System.Net.NetworkInformation.NetworkInterface.OperationalStatus tells us whether network connection is Up or Down. Is there any away that I can change that status programatically? i.e, can we enable/disable the network connection programatically?
Thanks
Ram
|
|
|
|
|
well. i guess there is no "managed" way to perform this task.
but if you´re willing to use some native winapi functions you
probably want to check out the following function defined in setupapi.h
SetupDiChangeState
SetupDiChangeState is the default handler for the DIF_PROPERTYCHANGE installation request. This function changes the state of an installed device.
WINSETUPAPI BOOL WINAPI<br />
SetupDiChangeState(<br />
IN HDEVINFO DeviceInfoSet,
IN OUT PSP_DEVINFO_DATA DeviceInfoData <br />
);
returns true if successful, false otherwise. if false, use GetLastError() to get more information.
a c# wrapper would look something like this:
[DllImport("setupapi.dll")]
public static extern WINSETUPAPI SetupDiChangeState(IntPtr DeviceInfoSet,
PSP_DEVINFO_DATA DeviceInfoData); //define PSP_DEVINFO_DATA as defined in setupapi.h
|
|
|
|
|
|
I am designing a project which requires that users can create their own plugins, by inheriting a class.
The class they inherit from inherits Form, and I am wanting to make it a bit more simple for the users to find the pertinent properties/methods of my class, and not have to dig through all the Form members.
The only way to do this is by shadowing all the members of Form and using EditorBrowsable/Browsable attribute right?
Has anyone ever done anything like this in a different way?
www.wickedorange.com
www.andrewvos.com
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Folks
Is there any way to implement a Pagination section (i.e. Page Count, Current page, and Page Navigation) inside the DataGridView, or will it have to be handled externaly?
I haven't found anything on it but i'm hoping there might be.
Cheers
Tris
-------------------------------
Carrier Bags - 21st Century Tumbleweed.
|
|
|
|
|
Tristan Rhodes wrote: Is there any way to implement a Pagination section
Not sure what you mean but perhaps you are looking for DataGridView.VirtualMode property?
led mike
|
|
|
|
|
I looked at that, and it didn't do what i wanted.
I'm basicaly looking for a way to get the same paging bar on a DataGrid as you get in the ASP.Net version:
<< < 1 2 3 4 5 > >>
I take it that's not possible then?
-------------------------------
Carrier Bags - 21st Century Tumbleweed.
|
|
|
|
|
Tristan Rhodes wrote: I take it that's not possible then?
Of course it is. I guess what you mean is it may not be possible by dropping a control on a form and setting some properties, you might have to actually develop some software yourself for it to be possible. You would do so by using the VirtualMode setting of the DataGridView. If you Google around you will find some articles where people have implemented paging. I don't know if they used the same << < 1 2 3 > >> control or not, it's irrelevant, paging the data in the control is a completely separate issue from how you implement capturing the users input to control the paging.
led mike
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry, my question was whether one existed that was integrated with the DGV or whether i would have to make my own.
I did the manual route anyway, but thanks for the feedback.
-------------------------------
Carrier Bags - 21st Century Tumbleweed.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm new for networking programing and i wanna know that how to write a java program for mesure to ping delay for particular site
Ex-: If we ping in command promt www.googe.com how to write a program for mesure ping delay??
CheeN
|
|
|
|
|
sacr83 wrote: how to write a java program
And you thought posting the question on a forum for .NET development was the best way to get that answered?
|
|
|
|
|
when we use the abstract class nad when we use the interface int applictions
raja
|
|
|
|
|
Google not working for you? There are many many results available: Google[^]
|
|
|
|
|
I'm assuming your question is more of a design question (where Google might not help much), as opposed to a simple question of what each is...
Personally, I tend to favor interfaces over abstract classes. I tend to use an abstract class only when I want to implement something like the template design pattern. I've been steadily moving towards keeping my objects more loosely-coupled, which interfaces help to do quite nicely. With an abstract class, however, that's not really true.
Hope that helps a bit.
BW
|
|
|
|
|
An interface is more of a service contract, whereas an abstract class is a base set of functionality which is useless by itself.
|
|
|
|
|
Yep, exactly. It took me a year to really get that.
|
|
|
|
|
how to handle the error handle in sqlserver 2000?
raja
|
|
|
|
|
Check the value of the global @@ERROR variable.
Paul Marfleet
"No, his mind is not for rent
To any God or government"
Tom Sawyer - Rush
|
|
|
|
|
I'm trying to move from programmatic configuration of remoting to using a config file, but I can't seem to get the config file to work.
Here's the relevant programmatic code (server side)...
<br />
BinaryServerFormatterSinkProvider serverProv = new BinaryServerFormatterSinkProvider();<br />
serverProv.TypeFilterLevel =System.Runtime.Serialization.Formatters.TypeFilterLevel.Full;<br />
BinaryClientFormatterSinkProvider clientProv = new BinaryClientFormatterSinkProvider();<br />
IDictionary props = new Hashtable();<br />
props["port"] = 8000;<br />
TcpChannel serviceChannel = new TcpChannel(props, clientProv, serverProv);<br />
ChannelServices.RegisterChannel(serviceChannel, true);<br />
AccountConnectionService service = new AccountConnectionService();<br />
RemotingServices.Marshal(service, "myService", typeof(IAccountConnectionService));<br />
This works just fine.
Here's my .config file...
<br />
configuration<br />
system.runtime.remoting<br />
application<br />
service<br />
wellknown type="Common.AccountConnectionService,Common"<br />
mode="Singleton" objectUri="myService"<br />
wellknown<br />
service<br />
channels<br />
channel ref="tcp" port="8000"<br />
channels<br />
serverproviders<br />
formatter ref="binary" typefilterlevel="Full" <br />
serverproviders<br />
clientprovider<br />
formatter ref="binary" typefilterlevel="Full"<br />
clientprovider<br />
application<br />
system.runtime.remoting<br />
configuration<br />
This doesn't work. It throws an "Authentication Exception" because the transport connection was closed. I'm not sure what the difference is or what I'm missing. I checked out the MSDN documentation, but tbh I couldn't make heads or tails of it. (I've cobbled this config together from various tutorials.) I don't think this should matter, but I'm still using programmatic configuration on the client side, I can post that code also if it helps. Any help is much appreciated.
BW
p.s. I apologize for the config looking ugly. The xml was getting messed up in the post, and I couldn't figure out how to make it look right.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, no replies so far...maybe a different question...
Does anyone know where to find a *thorough* tutorial/article on using a .config file for remoting?
And please don't say "just do a search, there are plenty out there," because every one I've seen so far is most certainly NOT thorough. Even the articles I've found on MSDN generally only touch on a few of the possible configuration features. The doc on the schema of configuring for remoting is also noticeably out of date. If someone could point me to one they already know of, though, that would be very much appreciated.
That said, if I don't get an answer here or elsewhere...I've got Rammer's book on the way, so hopefully I'll find what I need in there (but an earlier answer would be nice  ).
Thanks for any help.
BW
|
|
|
|
|
Hey
Just wondering if there is a built in control that offers functionality similar to the slide out panels in Visual Studio? I have considered either creating my own or modifying the split panel control. But if there is built in functionality I would much rather use that.
Thanks
Dan
At university studying Software Engineering - if i say this line to girls i find they won't talk to me
Dan
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
