|
|
|
|
Yes that will be sufficient to pull the open_pad_object(); in hybrid mode, but it will require the call of xwrite_flux_low(); before the initiating functions can be called at full system wefnuff.
Brad
Australian
- bryce on "Problems with Code Project"
*sigh* Maunder's been coding again...
|
|
|
|
|
Surely there must be a simpler AJAX solution.
"Great job, team. Head back to base for debriefing and cocktails."
(Spottswoode "Team America")
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hello,
I would like to know how to pass the reference of an array of structure to a function.
How the declaration, definition and function call should like?
Thanks & Regards,
Suman
|
|
|
|
|
See this,
typedef struct mySt
{
}myStObj;
void foo(myStObj*& fdsf)
{
}
|
|
|
|
|
i have to execute two process serially ie one after the other. is threading useful for this if so which thread to be use and how? can any one help me please
Arise Awake Stop Not Till ur Goal is Reached.
|
|
|
|
|
deeps_cute wrote: is threading useful for this
I would like to think so.
deeps_cute wrote: which thread to be use and how?
Hope this will help:
Multiple Threads[^]
Creating Threads:
Example[^]
The only programmers that are better than C programmers are those who code in 1's and 0's..... 
Programm3r My Blog: ^_^
|
|
|
|
|
ok but how to run the process serially
Arise Awake Stop Not Till ur Goal is Reached.
|
|
|
|
|
I thought your question was about threads?
Regards,
The only programmers that are better than C programmers are those who code in 1's and 0's.....
Programm3r My Blog: ^_^
|
|
|
|
|
actually i dont know how to run two process serially. i thought threading will be useful? if u have another idea pls let me know
Arise Awake Stop Not Till ur Goal is Reached.
|
|
|
|
|
deeps_cute wrote: i have to execute two process serially ie one after the other. is threading useful for this
Without knowing what you want to do, the answer to your question has to be no.
The answer is based on that threading is basically used when you want to do things in parallel and you want to do it in serial.
However, depending on what the two "processes" are supposed to do, a threading solution might be preferred. To be able to give you a better answer you have to describe what you're trying to do a little further.
"It's supposed to be hard, otherwise anybody could do it!" - selfquote
"High speed never compensates for wrong direction!" - unknown
|
|
|
|
|
i am having two exes say exe1 and exe2. i have to run exe2 only after exe1 has finished. how to do this?
Arise Awake Stop Not Till ur Goal is Reached.
|
|
|
|
|
deeps_cute wrote: i have to run exe2 only after exe1 has finished. how to do this?
You wait on the handle for the process. The wait can be issued with a call to ::WaitForSingleObject() from a worker thread. Or you can poll it with periodic calls to ::GetExitCodeProcess() and if it returns STILL_ACTIVE it hasn't finished yet.
"It's supposed to be hard, otherwise anybody could do it!" - selfquote
"High speed never compensates for wrong direction!" - unknown
|
|
|
|
|
deeps_cute wrote: i have to execute two process serially ie one after the other. is threading useful for this...
Not necessarily, since one is dependent on the other. You could just as easily do something like:
CreateProcess();
WaitForSingleProcess();
CreateProcess();
"Approved Workmen Are Not Ashamed" - 2 Timothy 2:15
"Judge not by the eye but by the heart." - Native American Proverb
|
|
|
|
|
Can someone give an example on where to use CMultilocks? A snippet. What does it do actually?
To use a CMultiLock object, first create an array of the synchronization objects that you wish to wait on. Next, call the CMultiLock object's constructor inside a member function in the controlled resource's class. Then call the Lock member function to determine if a resource is available (signaled). If one is, continue with the remainder of the member function. If no resource is available, either wait for a specified amount of time for a resource to be released, or return failure. After use of a resource is complete, either call the Unlock function if the CMultiLock object is to be used again, or allow the CMultiLock object to be destroyed.
A snippet please.
|
|
|
|
|
Are you looking for something like this,
CSyncObject* pSyncObjArray[2];
pSyncObjArray[0] = &mutex1;
pSyncObjArray[1] = &mutex1;
CMultiLock multi(pSyncObjArray, 2);
multi.Lock(INFINITE, TRUE, 0);
multi.Unlock();
|
|
|
|
|
Yes. Thanks Prasan som . Why finding a code for CMultilock is so difficult? even google didn't return proper examples Btw, did you vote me down?? after answering me? or why did I got voted down by someone?
286? WOWW!
|
|
|
|
|
_8086 wrote: Thanks Prasan som .
Welcome !
_8086 wrote: Why finding a code for CMultilock is so difficult? even google didn't return proper examples
Actually, it depends on how frequently its needed, I thing its rarely needed.
_8086 wrote: Btw, did you vote me down??
No, its not me. But, really strange question.
_8086 wrote: or why did I got voted down by someone?
There is no answer to this question.
|
|
|
|
|
hi,
a little question:
If i use the Dialog Ressource Editor, the size of the Dialog, displayed in the bottom-right corner says me for example 500x375 pixel. Calculating the size with another programm, the size is greater than 500x375 pixels.
At the execution of the application, i get also another value (via getWindowRect) for the width&height
Why does it display a different size ?
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
The numbers you see in resource editors are using dilaog unit(DLU).
One horizontal dilaog unit is 1/4 th of average of dialog box font width and one vertical dialog unit is 1/8 th of average of dialog box font height.
|
|
|
|
|
oha 
What is it good for?
Thx prasad_som 
|
|
|
|
|
baerten wrote: What is it good for?
Its by standard for MS.
baerten wrote: Thx prasad_som
Its my pleasure to help you.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
I'm afraid I'll see too much lag when I try to run open_pad_object(). What you think??? HELP!!!
