|
Hello everyone,
I'm sure it's been thought of various times before, but I'm waiting for a rebuild so this is more productive and self-entertaining than staring at the walls...
Just thinking about it without putting any really useful brain cells at risk, it would seem like it would kill two opposing birds with one stone. Lots of people hate having long namespaces used all over the place. Other people say it's a really bad thing because it can lead to clashes down the line and such. But an XML style scheme could work for both.
Any help will be appreciated.
|
|
|
|
|
Sounds completely pointless. It would be needlessly complicated to solve a non-existent problem.
|
|
|
|
|
david3217 wrote: hate having long namespaces
Having to type more is never a good reason to change anything. That's what you have autocompletion for. You should strive to write code that is easy to understand and manage. Writing less is not helping either. Using XML style will make your code harder to read and manage.
And if you really can't stand it, C++ already offers using. E. g. if you do a lot of I/O, you can write
using std::cout;
using std::endl;
using std::cin;
to abbreviate your code in your source file (never in a header file!). Not that it's really neccessary...
GOTOs are a bit like wire coat hangers: they tend to breed in the darkness, such that where there once were few, eventually there are many, and the program's architecture collapses beneath them. (Fran Poretto)
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: Having to type more is never a good reason to change anything
I disagree (I know, it is a matter of personal taste, anyway).
It is not just typing, but also reading back what you have (or some other developer has) typed. Think at progresses made in mathematics with the introduction of the symbolic notation (it is a far fetched example, but it gives you the idea).
|
|
|
|
|
If you type more, the resulting text should make your code more readable, not less. If it doesn't, that is an entirely different problem.
As a mathematician I do understand the advantage of short notation conventions. However, I also understand the problem of others not understanding your notation if they are not familiar with the shorthand notation you are using. So, if within your project team everyone agrees to certain shorthand notations, and actually take the time to document this (in case new members join the team), then the more power to you. Otherwise, just don't do it!
GOTOs are a bit like wire coat hangers: they tend to breed in the darkness, such that where there once were few, eventually there are many, and the program's architecture collapses beneath them. (Fran Poretto)
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: If you type more, the resulting text should make your code more readable, not less
Verbosity does not imply clarity. Often writing less makes your text more readable ("Je n'ai fait celle-ci plus longue que parce que je n'ai pas eu le loisir de la faire plus courte"  ).
Quote: As a mathematician I do understand the advantage of short notation conventions. However, I also understand the problem of others not understanding your notation if they are not familiar with the shorthand notation you are using. So, if within your project team everyone agrees to certain shorthand notations, and actually take the time to document this (in case new members join the team), then the more power to you. Otherwise, just don't do it!
I do agree with you on this (still, I believe that 'i' is a better name than 'index').
|
|
|
|
|
CPallini wrote: still, I believe that 'i' is a better name than 'index'
It depends...
In a very short for loop I usually prefer using 'i'.
However, if I fill in some listbox/listcontrol I prefer using 'index' or 'item' rather than 'i'.
|
|
|
|
|
The problem arises when you need to fill a listbox in a very short for loop. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
CPallini wrote: Verbosity does not imply clarity
That's why I said 'should'
CPallini wrote: (still, I believe that 'i' is a better name than 'index')
I agree that 'index' is no more useful a name than 'i'. If there is any implied meaning to an index other than being the i'th element in a container, I prefer a variable name that reflects this meaning. For example if I have a curve consisting of several joined edges, I prefer 'edge_index' over 'i' or 'index'. Not only does this add clarity, it also makes my code extendable: if I later find I want to process each edge as a list of points, I have no problem naming the nested loop variable as 'point_index', and i wouldn't need to rename the existing loop variable.
GOTOs are a bit like wire coat hangers: they tend to breed in the darkness, such that where there once were few, eventually there are many, and the program's architecture collapses beneath them. (Fran Poretto)
|
|
|
|
|
In Visual Studio 2019, the top level menu is placed in the top of the application (title bar).
AFAIK from what I can see from the MFC Project Wizard, there is no switch for that when creating a project (MDI/SDI template).
Is that another exclusive UI/UX component from Microsoft that we will never be able to use ?
I'd rather be phishing!
|
|
|
|
|
You can do it with raw Windows API but as MFC is only on maintenance it likely will never be available in MFC unless you do it yourself.
In vino veritas
|
|
|
|
|
The code can correctly display the bmp image that comes with the IDE, but can't display the image I added.
The IDE is visual studio 2012 and I use mfc to display bmp pictures.
This is the first piece of code in OnInitDialog():
static CImageList imgList;
imgList.Create(48,48,ILC_COLOR32,1,1);
imgList.Add(AfxGetApp()->LoadIcon(IDR_MAINFRAME));
m_List.SetImageList(&imgList,LVSIL_NORMAL);
m_List.InsertItem(0,_T("1th Test item"));
and the result of debug ——able to display the picture
while the second piece of code in OnInitDialog():
static CImageList imgList;
imgList.Create(40,48,ILC_COLOR32,1,1);
imgList.Add(AfxGetApp()->LoadIcon(IDB_BITMAP1));
m_List.SetImageList(&imgList,LVSIL_NORMAL);
m_List.InsertItem(0,_T("1th Test item"));
and the result of debug ——unable to display the picture,only blanks are displayed.
I am really sorry that I am a new man here and I do not know how to stick debug screenshots here.
|
|
|
|
|
tianzhili4399 wrote: static CImageList imgList;
imgList.Create(40,48,ILC_COLOR32,1,1);
imgList.Add(AfxGetApp()->LoadIcon(IDB_BITMAP1));
m_List.SetImageList(&imgList,LVSIL_NORMAL);
m_List.InsertItem(0,_T("1th Test item"));
Is the image IDB_BITMAP1 an icon or a bitmap? If it is a bitmap then you have to use CBitmap::LoadBitmap method (or LoadBitmap API function) instead.
BTW, what does the
AfxGetApp()->LoadIcon(IDB_BITMAP1) return?
|
|
|
|
|
I really appreciate you that I finally achieve my goal!Thank you very much!
|
|
|
|
|
You are welcome! 
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I am converting C++ mpi program into C:
I am free() error because I am using malloc at several places. I have data stored in a file. The first line of the file tells about number of lines of data in the file. I am getting that error correct i.e. 3200.
I have also corrected several errors with the cooperation of code project's developers. I am testing my code with:
print statements followed by:
finalize();
return;
My code upto the point where I am getting invalid free() error is:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <math.h>
#include <mpi.h>
#include <time.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
//#include <vector.h>
//using namespace std;
// Sorts the input row into chunks to be scattered two all the processors.
void sortByProcess(/*vector<double>*/double* list1, double* list2, int count);
// Swaps two rows.
void swap(double** list, int count, int row1, int row2);
int rank, size;
int main(int argc, char * argv[])
{
double sTime, eTime, rTime;
/*ifstream*/ FILE* inFile;
int num_rows = 3200;
int num_cols = 3200;
int cur_control = 0;
double * send_buffer = NULL;
double * recv_buffer = NULL;
double ** data = NULL;
double determinant;
char strNum_rows[20];
/*vector<double>*/double* file_buffer;
// Just get the initialization of the program going.
MPI_Init(&argc, &argv);
MPI_Comm_rank(MPI_COMM_WORLD, &rank);
MPI_Comm_size(MPI_COMM_WORLD, &size);
// If the input file is not given, print message and exit.
if(argc < 2)
{
/*cout <<*/ printf("No input file given.\n");// << endl;
MPI_Finalize();
return 0;
}
// If the root node (0), then open the input file and read in the
// number of rows.
if(!rank)
{
printf("After rank inside if @@@@@");
inFile = fopen(argv[1], "r");
fgets(strNum_rows, 20, inFile);
num_rows = atoi(strNum_rows);
printf("num_rows???? =%d",num_rows);
file_buffer = malloc(num_rows * sizeof(int));
/*???? inFile.open(argv[1]);
inFile >> num_rows;
file_buffer.resize(num_rows);*/
}
//printf("After rank outside @@@@@@@@#");
send_buffer = (double *)malloc(num_rows * sizeof(double));
/*?????send_buffer = new double[num_rows];*/
//printf("After send_buffer #####@");
// Broadcasts the number of rows to each processor.
MPI_Bcast (&num_rows, 1, MPI_INT, 0, MPI_COMM_WORLD);
num_cols = num_rows / size;
// Allocate the memory on each processor.
//printf("After Bcast #####@");
data = (double **) malloc(num_cols * sizeof(double *));
/*???? data #####@");*/
for(int i = 0; i < num_cols; i++)
data[i] = (double *) malloc(num_rows * sizeof(double));
/* ??? data[i] = new double[num_rows]; */
for(int i = 0; i < num_cols; i++)
{
for(int j = 0; j < num_rows; j++)
data[i][j] = 0;
}
//printf("Before recv_buffer $$$$$$$@");
recv_buffer = (double *) malloc(num_cols * sizeof(double));
/*???? recv_buffer = new double[num_cols];*/
// Scatter the data.
for(int i = 0; i < num_rows; i++)
{
if(!rank)
{
for(int j = 0; j < num_rows; j++){
fgets(strNum_rows, 20, inFile);
file_buffer[j] = atof(strNum_rows);
}
/*????? inFile >> file_buffer[j];*/
sortByProcess(file_buffer, send_buffer, num_rows);
}
//printf("After sortByProcess ^^^^^^@");
// Scatters the data so that each process gets the next value for their columns.
MPI_Scatter(send_buffer, num_cols, MPI_DOUBLE, recv_buffer, num_cols, MPI_DOUBLE, 0, MPI_COMM_WORLD );
for(int j = 0; j < num_cols; j++)
{
data[j][i] = recv_buffer[j];
}
}
//printf("After Scatter ^^^^^^@");
/*delete []*/
free(recv_buffer);
/*delete []*/
free(send_buffer);
// Begin timing.
MPI_Barrier(MPI_COMM_WORLD);
sTime = MPI_Wtime();
printf("After Barrier ^^^^^^@");
MPI_Finalize();
return 0;
The error which I am getting is:
$ mpicc gaussian.c
$ mpirun -np 4 ./a.out matrix.3200.txt
free(): invalid size
[lc2530hz:08268] *** Process received signal ***
[lc2530hz:08268] Signal: Aborted (6)
[lc2530hz:08268] Signal code: (-6)
[lc2530hz:08268] [ 0] /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x3ef20)[0x7f107b56af20]
[lc2530hz:08268] [ 1] /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(gsignal+0xc7)[0x7f107b56ae97]
[lc2530hz:08268] [ 2] /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(abort+0x141)[0x7f107b56c801]
[lc2530hz:08268] [ 3] /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x89897)[0x7f107b5b5897]
[lc2530hz:08268] [ 4] /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x9090a)[0x7f107b5bc90a]
[lc2530hz:08268] [ 5] /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(cfree+0x4dc)[0x7f107b5c3e2c]
[lc2530hz:08268] [ 6] ./a.out(+0x1056)[0x564381392056]
[lc2530hz:08268] [ 7] /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xe7)[0x7f107b54db97]
[lc2530hz:08268] [ 8] ./a.out(+0xbda)[0x564381391bda]
[lc2530hz:08268] *** End of error message ***
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mpirun noticed that process rank 0 with PID 0 on node lc2530hz exited on signal 6 (Aborted).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
$
Somebody please guide me how to remove this error.
Zulfi.
|
|
|
|
|
Something, somewhere is corrupting one of your malloc() blocks. First off, I count 5 calls to malloc(), but only 2 calls to free() in the code given. That's unlikely to be the source of your problem here, but it does mean you have a memory leak, unless that memory is freed up elsewhere.
Since you have 2 calls to free() and a hex stack dump, we don't know which free() is causing the problem. In order to get better data on where and why you have the corruption first compile your program with debug info enabled. Google suggests that you should be able to pass the -g flag to mpicc. You might also want to use the -o <file-name> option to write the output to file-name instead of a.out e.g. mpicc -g gaussian.c -o gaussian
There is an excellent tool to help debug memory allocation problems available for linux called valgrind. Once again a little googling about suggest that the way to run valgrind with mpirun is
mpirun -n 2 valgrind --tool=memcheck ./a.out
You may need to figure out how to install valgrind on your system.
Update: you can send the output from valgrind to a log file using --logfile=vg_log.%p, which would send the valgrind output to a file vg_log.1479, where 1479 is the process id of the running program. AIUI, you would get a vg_log.nnnn for each process spawned by mpirun. Take a look at the man page for valgrind and/or see the online documentation for further info.
|
|
|
|
|
The code is not very well written to begin with, so please do not write something like this for a real world application. Be sure to check if each malloc succeeded before using it or you may end up crashing your application - safety first.
I recommend breaking out the pencil an paper and working through the code. Drawing out the arrays (both 1D and 2D) would help in analyzing the code - along with the debugger.
It is a bit confusing when the traditional row/column layout is backwards:
Normal: buffer[row][column]
In this code: buffer[column][row] <<<< this is backwards.
file_buffer is not initialized which could lead to an issue if it does not actually get allocate it.
file_buffer = NULL; file_buffer size allocation is not correct - it should be using sizeof(double) not sizeof(int). This is important, because you are copying double values into the buffer. Depending on the compiler, the size of a double is probably 2 x sizeof(int). This could cause massive memory corruption.
When memory buffers are allocated one after another, then there is a strong possibility that they follow each other in memory - like so [file_buffer][send_buffer][data]. This means that the loop filling in the file_buffer would be over writing the send_buffer, due to the fact that the file_buffer is not large enough to hold an array of double values.
A little more information is required here about the most like memory lay out.
Buffer allocation layout: [[allocation size][allocated memory]]
When malloc allocates the memory, it reserves the start of the allocated block to hold the size of memory block being allocated and returns a pointer to the memory location following the allocation size data. Therefore, given the above, your code probably allocated the file_buffer and overwrote the allocation size of the send_buffer, leading to the invalid size error.
If the file_buffer is allocated, then ensure that it is freed.
You need to free each data[i] in a loop and then free the data buffer itself.
Since I do not see anything else filling in the send_buffer or recv_buffer, I am going to assume that MPI_Scatter() is filling those buffers. If that is the case, then keep in mind that the number of row does not equal the number of columns unless the size value is equal to 1.
num_cols = num_rows / size; That implies that the following call is incorrect:
MPI_Scatter(send_buffer, num_cols, MPI_DOUBLE, recv_buffer, num_cols, MPI_DOUBLE, 0, MPI_COMM_WORLD); Should probably written as follows:
MPI_Scatter(send_buffer, num_rows, MPI_DOUBLE, recv_buffer, num_cols, MPI_DOUBLE, 0, MPI_COMM_WORLD);
INTP
"Program testing can be used to show the presence of bugs, but never to show their absence." - Edsger Dijkstra
"I have never been lost, but I will admit to being confused for several weeks. " - Daniel Boone
|
|
|
|
|
Hi John & K5054,
Thanks a lot.
I have modified the code as John told me but still I am getting errors but no pointer error.
I tried changing num_cols to num_rows but it gave me following errors:
$ mpicc gaussian.c
$ mpirun -np 4 ./a.out matrix.3200.txt
[lc2530hz:5502] *** An error occurred in MPI_Scatter
[lc2530hz:5502] *** reported by process [2594701313,0]
[lc2530hz:5502] *** on communicator MPI_COMM_WORLD
[lc2530hz:5502] *** MPI_ERR_TRUNCATE: message truncated
[lc2530hz:5502] *** MPI_ERRORS_ARE_FATAL (processes in this communicator will now abort,
[lc2530hz:5502] *** and potentially your MPI job)
So I changed back to num_cols. The changed code is now:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <math.h>
#include <mpi.h>
#include <time.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
//#include <vector.h>
//using namespace std;
// Sorts the input row into chunks to be scattered two all the processors.
void sortByProcess(/*vector<double>*/double* list1, double* list2, int count);
// Swaps two rows.
void swap(double** list, int count, int row1, int row2);
int rank, size;
int main(int argc, char * argv[])
{
double sTime, eTime, rTime;
/*ifstream*/ FILE* inFile;
int num_rows = 3200;
int num_cols = 3200;
int cur_control = 0;
double * send_buffer = NULL;
double * recv_buffer = NULL;
double ** data = NULL;
double determinant;
char strNum_rows[20];
/*vector<double>*/double* file_buffer=NULL;
// Just get the initialization of the program going.
MPI_Init(&argc, &argv);
MPI_Comm_rank(MPI_COMM_WORLD, &rank);
MPI_Comm_size(MPI_COMM_WORLD, &size);
// If the input file is not given, print message and exit.
if(argc < 2)
{
/*cout <<*/ printf("No input file given.\n");// << endl;
MPI_Finalize();
return 0;
}
// If the root node (0), then open the input file and read in the
// number of rows.
if(!rank)
{
printf("After rank inside if @@@@@");
inFile = fopen(argv[1], "r");
fgets(strNum_rows, 20, inFile);
num_rows = atoi(strNum_rows);
printf("num_rows???? =%d",num_rows);
file_buffer = (double *) malloc(num_rows * sizeof(double *));//1
if(file_buffer == NULL) {
printf("malloc can't allocate memory for file_buffer");
return -1;
}
/*???? inFile.open(argv[1]);
inFile >> num_rows;
file_buffer.resize(num_rows);*/
}
//printf("After rank outside @@@@@@@@#");
send_buffer = (double *)malloc(num_rows * sizeof(double *));
if(send_buffer == NULL) {
printf("malloc can't allocate memory for send_buffer");
return -1;
}
/*?????send_buffer = new double[num_rows];*/
//printf("After send_buffer #####@");
// Broadcasts the number of rows to each processor.
MPI_Bcast (&num_rows, 1, MPI_INT, 0, MPI_COMM_WORLD);
num_cols = num_rows / size;
// Allocate the memory on each processor.
//printf("After Bcast #####@");
data = (double **) malloc(num_cols * sizeof(double *));
if(data == NULL) {
printf("malloc can't allocate memory for data");
return -1;
}
/*???? data #####@");*/
for(int i = 0; i < num_cols; i++){
data[i] = (double *) malloc(num_rows * sizeof(double *));
if(data[i] == NULL) {
printf("malloc can't allocate memory for data[%d]", i);
return -1;
}
}
/* ??? data[i] = new double[num_rows]; */
for(int i = 0; i < num_cols; i++)
{
for(int j = 0; j < num_rows; j++)
data[i][j] = 0;
}
//printf("Before recv_buffer $$$$$$$@");
recv_buffer = (double *) malloc(num_cols * sizeof(double *));
if(recv_buffer == NULL) {
printf("malloc can't allocate memory for recv_buffer");
return -1;
}
/*???? recv_buffer = new double[num_cols];*/
// Scatter the data.
for(int i = 0; i < num_rows; i++)
{
if(!rank)
{
for(int j = 0; j < num_rows; j++){
fgets(strNum_rows, 20, inFile);
file_buffer[j] = atof(strNum_rows);
}
/*????? inFile >> file_buffer[j];*/
sortByProcess(file_buffer, send_buffer, num_rows);
}
//printf("After sortByProcess ^^^^^^@");
// Scatters the data so that each process gets the next value for their columns.
MPI_Scatter(send_buffer, num_cols/* NOTE num_rows gives SCATTER ERROR &deviates from original code */, MPI_DOUBLE, recv_buffer, num_cols, MPI_DOUBLE, 0, MPI_COMM_WORLD );
for(int j = 0; j < num_cols; j++)
{
data[j][i] = recv_buffer[j];
}
}
//printf("After Scatter ^^^^^^@");
fclose(inFile);
/*delete []*/ free(recv_buffer);
/*delete []*/ free(send_buffer);
//free(file_buffer);
/*delete []*/ //free(send_buffer);
for(int i = 0; i < num_cols; i++)
/*delete []*/ free( data[i]);
/*delete []*/ free(data);
// Begin timing.
MPI_Barrier(MPI_COMM_WORLD);
sTime = MPI_Wtime();
printf("After Barrier ^^^^^^@");
MPI_Finalize();
return 0;
And the errors which I am gettingare:
$ mpicc gaussian.c
$ mpirun -np 4 ./a.out matrix.3200.txt
[lc2530hz:05635] *** Process received signal ***
[lc2530hz:05635] Signal: Segmentation fault (11)
[lc2530hz:05635] Signal code: (128)
[lc2530hz:05635] Failing at address: (nil)
[lc2530hz:05636] *** Process received signal ***
[lc2530hz:05636] Signal: Segmentation fault (11)
[lc2530hz:05636] Signal code: (128)
[lc2530hz:05636] Failing at address: (nil)
[lc2530hz:05637] *** Process received signal ***
[lc2530hz:05637] Signal: Segmentation fault (11)
[lc2530hz:05637] Signal code: (128)
[lc2530hz:05637] Failing at address: (nil)
[lc2530hz:05636] [ 0] [lc2530hz:05637] [ 0] /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x3ef20)[0x7f7ac9b11f20]
[lc2530hz:05637] [ 1] [lc2530hz:05635] [ 0] /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x3ef20)[0x7fd882900f20]
[lc2530hz:05635] /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x3ef20)[0x7fdeb9110f20]
[lc2530hz:05636] [ 1] [ 1] /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(fclose+0xd4)[0x7fdeb9150324]
[lc2530hz:05636] [ 2] ./a.out(+0x116c)[0x/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(fclose+0xd4)[0x7f7ac9b51324]
[lc2530hz:05637] [ 2] ./a.out(+0x116c)[0x5651bd24c16c]
[lc2530hz:05637] [ 3] /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(fclose+0xd4)[0x7fd882940324]
[lc2530hz:05635] [ 2] 56176a25a16c]
[lc2530hz:05636] [ 3] /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(./a.out(+0x116c)[0x55ee0e31b16c]
[lc2530hz:05635] [ 3] /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0x/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xe7)[0x7f7ac9af4b97]
[lc2530hz:05637] __libc_start_main+0xe7)[0x7fdeb90f3b97]
[lc2530hz:05636] [ 4] ./a.out(+0xc1a)[0x56176a259c1a[ 4] ./a.out(+0xc1a)[0x5651bd24bc1a]
[lc2530hz:05637] *** End of error message ***
e7)[0x7fd8828e3b97]
[lc2530hz:05635] [ 4] ./a.out(+0xc1a]
[lc2530hz:05636] *** End of error message ***
)[0x55ee0e31ac1a]
[lc2530hz:05635] *** End of error message ***
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mpirun noticed that process rank 1 with PID 0 on node lc2530hz exited on signal 11 (Segmentation fault).
-----------------------------------------------
Somebody please guide me.
Zulfi.
|
|
|
|
|
It looks like you may be accessing a null pointer location - that is just a guess based on the line "Failing at address: (nil)".
Also, given that the first argument failure calls MPI_Finalize() before returning. You should be calling it before returning from anywhere in the main function - consistancy is important.
The following is still and issue
file_buffer = (double *) malloc(num_rows * sizeof(double *)); should be
file_buffer = (double *) malloc(num_rows * sizeof(double)); because you are storing double values, not pointer values. That also applies to your other buffers, with the exception of of the data buffer. The data buffer is a pointer to an memory allocated array of pointers. Although the individual entries in the array should be allocated like so
data[i] = malloc(num_rows * sizeof(double); You may want to consider using calloc, when allocating the data array, to ensure that all the pointer variables are initialized to 0.
data = (double **)calloc(num_rows, sizeof(double*)); The main reason you want all pointer types initialized to null (a.k.a. 0), is that free function ignores null pointers. But if the pointer contains some random value, then the behavior is undefined and anything could happen - compiler dependent behavior.
What may help you better understand what is happening; you could always add a print statement everywhere you allocate or modify the data. This is what you would call old school debugging - the print statements are removed before releasing the finished product.
Example:
printf("data (double**)calloc(%d, sizeof(double*)", num_col);OR
printf("data (double**)calloc(%d, %u)", num_col, sizeof(double *));For very small data sets, doing this in the data allocation loop will also be helpfull.
for(int i=0; i < num_cols; ++i)
{
printf("data[%d] = malloc(%u)", i, num_rows * sizeof(double));
data[i] = (double*) malloc(num_rows * sizeof(double));
if (data[i] == NULL)
{
return -2;
}
}
If you run the program from the command line, then you can just pipe the output to a file for latter study.
application.exe >> output.txt
INTP
"Program testing can be used to show the presence of bugs, but never to show their absence." - Edsger Dijkstra
"I have never been lost, but I will admit to being confused for several weeks. " - Daniel Boone
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for your interest in my problem. God bless you.
I am till getting same error messages in my redirected output file. The messages are:
[lc2530hz:03857] *** Process received signal ***
[lc2530hz:03857] Signal: Segmentation fault (11)
[lc2530hz:03857] Signal code: (128)
[lc2530hz:03857] Failing at address: (nil)
[lc2530hz:03858] *** Process received signal ***
[lc2530hz:03858] Signal: Segmentation fault (11)
[lc2530hz:03858] Signal code: (128)
[lc2530hz:03858] Failing at address: (nil)
[lc2530hz:03859] *** Process received signal ***
[lc2530hz:03859] Signal: Segmentation fault (11)
[lc2530hz:03859] Signal code: (128)
[lc2530hz:03859] Failing at address: (nil)
[lc2530hz:03857] [ 0] /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x3ef20)[0x7f7c3323df20]
[lc2530hz:03857] [ 1] /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(fclose+0xd4)[0x7f7c3327d324]
[lc2530hz:03857] [ 2] ./a.out(+0x125b)[0x5581b8fa925b]
[lc2530hz:03857] [ 3] [lc2530hz:03858] [ 0] /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x3ef20)[0x7fa90fa0af20]
[lc2530hz:03858] [ 1] /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(fclose+0xd4)[0x7fa90fa4a324]
[lc2530hz:03858] [ 2] ./a.out(+0x125b)[0x557a7d5c725b]
[lc2530hz:03858] [lc2530hz:03859] [ 0] /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x3ef20)[0x7f157c799f20]
[lc2530hz:03859] [ 1] /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(fclose+0xd4)[0x7f157c7d9324]
[lc2530hz:03859] [ 2] ./a.out(+0x125b)[0x55dd2168325b]
[lc2530hz:03859] [ 3] /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xe7)[0x7f7c33220b97]
[ 3] /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xe7)[0x7f157c77cb97]
[lc2530hz:03859] [ 4] [lc2530hz:03857] [ 4] ./a.out(+0xc6a)[0x5581b8fa8c6a]
[lc2530hz:03857] *** End of error message ***
+0xe7)[0x7fa90f9edb97]
[lc2530hz:03858] [ 4] ./a.out(+0xc6a)[0x557a7d5c6c6a]
[lc2530hz:03858] *** End of error message ***
./a.out(+0xc6a)[0x55dd21682c6a]
[lc2530hz:03859] *** End of error message ***
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mpirun noticed that process rank 3 with PID 0 on node lc2530hz exited on signal 11 (Segmentation fault).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
My modified code is:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <math.h>
#include <mpi.h>
#include <time.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
//#include <vector.h>
//using namespace std;
// Sorts the input row into chunks to be scattered two all the processors.
void sortByProcess(/*vector<double>*/double* list1, double* list2, int count);
// Swaps two rows.
void swap(double** list, int count, int row1, int row2);
int rank, size;
int main(int argc, char * argv[])
{
double sTime, eTime, rTime;
/*ifstream*/ FILE* inFile;
int num_rows = 3200;
int num_cols = 3200;
int cur_control = 0;
double * send_buffer = NULL;
double * recv_buffer = NULL;
double ** data = NULL;
double determinant;
char strNum_rows[20];
/*vector<double>*/double* file_buffer=NULL;
// Just get the initialization of the program going.
MPI_Init(&argc, &argv);
MPI_Comm_rank(MPI_COMM_WORLD, &rank);
MPI_Comm_size(MPI_COMM_WORLD, &size);
// If the input file is not given, print message and exit.
if(argc < 2)
{
/*cout <<*/ printf("No input file given.\n");// << endl;
MPI_Finalize();
return 0;
}
// If the root node (0), then open the input file and read in the
// number of rows.
if(!rank)
{
printf("After rank inside if @@@@@");
inFile = fopen(argv[1], "r");
fgets(strNum_rows, 20, inFile);
num_rows = atoi(strNum_rows);
printf("num_rows???? =%d",num_rows);
file_buffer = (double *) malloc(num_rows * sizeof(double ));//1
if(file_buffer == NULL) {
printf("malloc can't allocate memory for file_buffer");
MPI_Finalize();
return -1;
}
/*???? inFile.open(argv[1]);
inFile >> num_rows;
file_buffer.resize(num_rows);*/
}
//printf("After rank outside @@@@@@@@#");
send_buffer = (double *)malloc(num_rows * sizeof(double ));
if(send_buffer == NULL) {
printf("malloc can't allocate memory for send_buffer");
MPI_Finalize();
return -1;
}
/*?????send_buffer = new double[num_rows];*/
//printf("After send_buffer #####@");
// Broadcasts the number of rows to each processor.
MPI_Bcast (&num_rows, 1, MPI_INT, 0, MPI_COMM_WORLD);
num_cols = num_rows / size;
// Allocate the memory on each processor.
//printf("After Bcast #####@");
//data = (double **) malloc(num_cols * sizeof(double *));
//calloc initializes the allocated memory to zero
data = (double **)calloc(num_rows, sizeof(double*));
if(data == NULL) {
printf("malloc can't allocate memory for data");
MPI_Finalize();
return -1;
}
/*???? data #####@");*/
for(int i = 0; i < num_cols; i++){
data[i] = (double *) malloc(num_rows * sizeof(double ));
if(data[i] == NULL) {
printf("data[%d] = malloc(%lu)", i, num_rows * sizeof(double));
printf("malloc can't allocate memory for data[%d]", i);
//
if(i>0) {
for(int j = i-1; j>=0; j--)
free( data[j]);
free(data);
MPI_Finalize();
return -2;
}
}
}
/* ??? data[i] = new double[num_rows]; */
for(int i = 0; i < num_cols; i++)
{
for(int j = 0; j < num_rows; j++)
data[i][j] = 0;
}
//printf("Before recv_buffer $$$$$$$@");
recv_buffer = (double *) malloc(num_cols * sizeof(double *));
if(recv_buffer == NULL) {
printf("malloc can't allocate memory for recv_buffer");
MPI_Finalize();
return -1;
}
/*???? recv_buffer = new double[num_cols];*/
// Scatter the data.
for(int i = 0; i < num_rows; i++)
{
if(!rank)
{
for(int j = 0; j < num_rows; j++){
fgets(strNum_rows, 20, inFile);
file_buffer[j] = atof(strNum_rows);
}
/*????? inFile >> file_buffer[j];*/
sortByProcess(file_buffer, send_buffer, num_rows);
}
//printf("After sortByProcess ^^^^^^@");
// Scatters the data so that each process gets the next value for their columns.
MPI_Scatter(send_buffer, num_cols/* NOTE num_rows gives SCATTER ERROR &deviates from original code */, MPI_DOUBLE, recv_buffer, num_cols, MPI_DOUBLE, 0, MPI_COMM_WORLD );
for(int j = 0; j < num_cols; j++)
{
data[j][i] = recv_buffer[j];
}
}
//printf("After Scatter ^^^^^^@");
fclose(inFile);
/*delete []*/ free(recv_buffer);
/*delete []*/ free(send_buffer);
//free(file_buffer);
/*delete []*/ //free(send_buffer);
for(int i = 0; i < num_cols; i++)
/*delete []*/ free( data[i]);
/*delete []*/ free(data);
// Begin timing.
MPI_Barrier(MPI_COMM_WORLD);
sTime = MPI_Wtime();
printf("After Barrier ^^^^^^@");
MPI_Finalize();
return 0;
My compilation and execution statements are:
$mpicc gaussian.c
$mpirun -np 4 ./a.out matrix.3200.txt>output
Some body please guide me.
Zulfi.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi friends,
This problem got solved.
Thanks for your efforts. God bless you guys.
Solution is:
if (!rank)
fclose(inFile);
Zulfi.
|
|
|
|
|
Good to here.
But you need to fix this
recv_buffer = (double *) malloc(num_cols * sizeof(double *)); it should be
recv_buffer = (double *) malloc(num_cols * sizeof(double));
INTP
"Program testing can be used to show the presence of bugs, but never to show their absence." - Edsger Dijkstra
"I have never been lost, but I will admit to being confused for several weeks. " - Daniel Boone
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Thanks for your good intentions and for correcting my code through defensive programming techniques.
I was missing you. I am not getting correct results. C++ code is giving correct results. I would take up this problem again but I have to complete the assigned task first.
Wish you all the best.
Zulfi.
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
