Click here to Skip to main content
15,918,706 members
Home / Discussions / C / C++ / MFC
   

C / C++ / MFC

 
QuestionRe: Pure virtual base class question Pin
CPallini7-Jul-11 10:27
mveCPallini7-Jul-11 10:27 
AnswerRe: Pure virtual base class question Pin
Niklas L7-Jul-11 20:46
Niklas L7-Jul-11 20:46 
GeneralRe: Pure virtual base class question Pin
CPallini7-Jul-11 21:14
mveCPallini7-Jul-11 21:14 
GeneralRe: Pure virtual base class question Pin
Niklas L7-Jul-11 21:53
Niklas L7-Jul-11 21:53 
AnswerRe: Pure virtual base class question Pin
Maximilien8-Jul-11 2:55
Maximilien8-Jul-11 2:55 
AnswerRe: Pure virtual base class question Pin
Erudite_Eric7-Jul-11 22:33
Erudite_Eric7-Jul-11 22:33 
GeneralRe: Pure virtual base class question Pin
Stefan_Lang10-Jul-11 22:40
Stefan_Lang10-Jul-11 22:40 
GeneralRe: Pure virtual base class question Pin
Erudite_Eric10-Jul-11 22:43
Erudite_Eric10-Jul-11 22:43 
Questionoperator overloading problem....... Pin
gateway236-Jul-11 20:01
gateway236-Jul-11 20:01 
AnswerRe: operator overloading problem....... PinPopular
Niklas L6-Jul-11 21:11
Niklas L6-Jul-11 21:11 
GeneralRe: operator overloading problem....... Pin
Stefan_Lang7-Jul-11 23:58
Stefan_Lang7-Jul-11 23:58 
GeneralRe: operator overloading problem....... Pin
Niklas L8-Jul-11 1:06
Niklas L8-Jul-11 1:06 
AnswerRe: operator overloading problem....... Pin
JanakiramanElumalai7-Jul-11 4:09
JanakiramanElumalai7-Jul-11 4:09 
QuestionWhat are the basic benefits of using mmioxxxx “file” functions as opposed to “plain “ MFC CFile? Pin
Vaclav_6-Jul-11 13:34
Vaclav_6-Jul-11 13:34 
AnswerRe: What are the basic benefits of using mmioxxxx “file” functions as opposed to “plain “ MFC CFile? Pin
Mark Salsbery6-Jul-11 13:43
Mark Salsbery6-Jul-11 13:43 
GeneralRe: What are the basic benefits of using mmioxxxx “file” functions as opposed to “plain “ MFC CFile? Pin
Vaclav_6-Jul-11 15:43
Vaclav_6-Jul-11 15:43 
QuestionIOCP again Pin
csrss6-Jul-11 8:34
csrss6-Jul-11 8:34 
AnswerRe: IOCP again Pin
cmk6-Jul-11 10:38
cmk6-Jul-11 10:38 
AnswerRe: IOCP again Pin
Mark Salsbery6-Jul-11 10:56
Mark Salsbery6-Jul-11 10:56 
GeneralRe: IOCP again Pin
csrss6-Jul-11 11:11
csrss6-Jul-11 11:11 
QuestionThe code, in short Pin
csrss6-Jul-11 11:58
csrss6-Jul-11 11:58 
AnswerRe: The code, in short Pin
Mark Salsbery6-Jul-11 13:21
Mark Salsbery6-Jul-11 13:21 
GeneralRe: The code, in short Pin
csrss6-Jul-11 14:53
csrss6-Jul-11 14:53 
Thats basically doesnt matter, you can mix it. What you cannot is HeapAlloc and free or malloc and HeapFree for example. It seems to me that its kind of not possible to have memory allocations with IOCP. No matter what i do, app always crashes randomly. And there is always heap corruption. If there is static buffer - 1000 connections without a problem, if there is dynamic memory allocation - even one connection crashes.
011011010110000101100011011010000110100101101110
0110010101110011

GeneralRe: The code, in short Pin
Mark Salsbery6-Jul-11 15:22
Mark Salsbery6-Jul-11 15:22 
QuestionDynamic Tree Pin
john56326-Jul-11 1:28
john56326-Jul-11 1:28 

General General    News News    Suggestion Suggestion    Question Question    Bug Bug    Answer Answer    Joke Joke    Praise Praise    Rant Rant    Admin Admin   

Use Ctrl+Left/Right to switch messages, Ctrl+Up/Down to switch threads, Ctrl+Shift+Left/Right to switch pages.