C / C++ / MFC

FirstPrevNext

Re: MFC and Internet ?? Eytukan24-Jun-05 5:29 Eytukan 24-Jun-05 5:29  Nice link Ravi.. thanks.. i cant believe how fast i'm getting help with codeproject..! vivek Re: MFC and Internet ?? Smith#24-Jun-05 5:38 Smith# 24-Jun-05 5:38  thanks david n ravi. the link is really resourceful. learning, Rookie Re: MFC and Internet ?? Eytukan24-Jun-05 5:40 Eytukan 24-Jun-05 5:40  i just had similar doubt.. thankz rook vivek RSA implementation T1TAN24-Jun-05 2:52 T1TAN 24-Jun-05 2:52  hi ppl, I've been looking around for a while now, and I still can't find a simple, minimum & easy to use RSA implementation (and free of course). If know of such implementation, I'd appreciate some info I need to be able to use the implementation in a shareware app, but only for my protection scheme, i.e. internal use. Further on, MFC or any other framework should not be used (so, plain Win32 API or STL are good ) I know this is a bit too specific, but if anyone knows anything, it would be a great help --- YOU KNOW WHAT YOU ARE BLONDIE!?!? YOU'RE JUST A SON OF A BA A A A AAAAAAAAAA!!!!! http://sprdsoft.cmar-net.org http://t1tan.cjb.net Re: RSA implementation Chris Losinger24-Jun-05 5:12 Chris Losinger 24-Jun-05 5:12  crypto++ is what i use. it's not simple, it's not small, and it's not easy to use. but it works. Cleek | Image Toolkits | Thumbnail maker Re: RSA implementation Alexander M.,24-Jun-05 10:34 Alexander M., 24-Jun-05 10:34  There is also a version from RSA laboratories... It is much smaller and easier to use... but I've forgotten the download link Don't try it, just do it! Re: RSA implementation T1TAN27-Jun-05 22:03 T1TAN 27-Jun-05 22:03  I've been digging through RSA labs site for a loooong time, and all I could find is a bunch of docs Is there another download location for RSA stuff?? thx --- YOU KNOW WHAT YOU ARE BLONDIE!?!? YOU'RE JUST A SON OF A BA A A A AAAAAAAAAA!!!!! http://sprdsoft.cmar-net.org http://t1tan.cjb.net Re: RSA implementation T1TAN27-Jun-05 21:43 T1TAN 27-Jun-05 21:43  yeeeees I've tried that, I couldn't get the thing working.. Anyways, since RSA is going to be a part of anti-crack-hack-slash protection, I think it would be unwise to use crypto++ since it's a separate module..could be easily avoided & my proggy would eventually get hacked (like that's not gonna happen anyway ) But I might take a closer look whatsoever, thanx --- YOU KNOW WHAT YOU ARE BLONDIE!?!? YOU'RE JUST A SON OF A BA A A A AAAAAAAAAA!!!!! http://sprdsoft.cmar-net.org http://t1tan.cjb.net Re: RSA implementation Chris Losinger28-Jun-05 1:13 Chris Losinger 28-Jun-05 1:13  T1TAN wrote: I think it would be unwise to use crypto++ since it's a separate module.. just use static linking. Cleek | Image Toolkits | Thumbnail maker C++ - "We don't use STL here" Kevin McFarlane24-Jun-05 2:01 Kevin McFarlane 24-Jun-05 2:01  That's what I was told by my boss in my last contract, when he was looking at some of my code that used it. His view was that he wouldn't touch it with a barge pole. Given that STL is a part of Standard C++ what do you guys think of such an attitude? Kevin Re: C++ - "We don't use STL here" David Crow24-Jun-05 2:26 David Crow 24-Jun-05 2:26  Kevin McFarlane wrote: what do you guys think of such an attitude? Ignore it and move on. "Ideas are a dime a dozen. People who put them into action are priceless." - Unknown Re: C++ - "We don't use STL here" Kevin McFarlane24-Jun-05 4:25 Kevin McFarlane 24-Jun-05 4:25  Pretty much what I did. Also, I only worked on that paticular project for two or three weeks. Kevin Re: C++ - "We don't use STL here" Nemanja Trifunovic24-Jun-05 2:27 Nemanja Trifunovic 24-Jun-05 2:27  Well, he is the boss, right? If he is ready to pay you for the extra hours you are going to spend because you can't use the Standard Library, it's all good and well. Your time is his money, right? My programming blahblahblah blog. If you ever find anything useful here, please let me know to remove it. Re: C++ - "We don't use STL here" CP Visitor24-Jun-05 2:33 CP Visitor 24-Jun-05 2:33  Nemanja Trifunovic wrote: Well, he is the boss, right? If he is ready to pay you for the extra hours you are going to spend because you can't use the Standard Library, it's all good and well. Your time is his money, right? And if they just use containers from MFC or another library instead of STL bloatware? Re: C++ - "We don't use STL here" Nemanja Trifunovic24-Jun-05 5:50 Nemanja Trifunovic 24-Jun-05 5:50  CP Visitor wrote: And if they just use containers from MFC or another library STL is more than just "containers", although I agree that using MFC containers is much better than raw arrays. CP Visitor wrote: STL bloatware Just take some time and learn it - it is really useful, especially when enriched with Boost libraries. Although, I admit I hate its name conventions My programming blahblahblah blog. If you ever find anything useful here, please let me know to remove it. Re: C++ - "We don't use STL here" ThatsAlok24-Jun-05 2:44 ThatsAlok 24-Jun-05 2:44  Kevin McFarlane wrote: Given that STL is a part of Standard C++ what do you guys think of such an attitude? May be, He doesn't like STL at all "Opinions are neither right nor wrong. I cannot change your opinion. I can, however, change what influences your opinion." - David Crow cheers, Alok Gupta Re: C++ - "We don't use STL here" Kevin McFarlane24-Jun-05 4:27 Kevin McFarlane 24-Jun-05 4:27  He didn't. Kevin Re: C++ - "We don't use STL here" Gary R. Wheeler24-Jun-05 2:50 Gary R. Wheeler 24-Jun-05 2:50  Unfortunately, his attitude was probably formed from the poor support for the STL provided by Microsoft prior to VS.NET. We have a similar problem, in that our development up to now has used the MFC collection classes, and we really don't want to mix the two at this point. Software Zen: delete this; Re: C++ - "We don't use STL here" Kevin McFarlane24-Jun-05 4:30 Kevin McFarlane 24-Jun-05 4:30  I found VC++ 6's STL support good enough for what I wanted to do. Maybe I'm an insufficiently advanced STL user? I view these things as tools. If the MFC collection classes do what you want then use them. But if there is functionality available in STL which is not in MFC we shouldn't be afraid to use it. Especially as STL is part of Standard C++. Kevin Re: C++ - "We don't use STL here" Chris Losinger24-Jun-05 5:13 Chris Losinger 24-Jun-05 5:13  Kevin McFarlane wrote: I found VC++ 6's STL support good enough for what I wanted to do. same here. i never understood all the complaints about VC6's STL. Cleek | Image Toolkits | Thumbnail maker Re: C++ - "We don't use STL here" Nemanja Trifunovic24-Jun-05 5:46 Nemanja Trifunovic 24-Jun-05 5:46  Chris Losinger wrote: same here. i never understood all the complaints about VC6's STL For single-threaded programs it was mostly fine (unless you were passing STL containers accross DLL boundaries). However, for multithreaded it was dangerously broken, unless you applied these fixes[^] (especially the one for xtree) Yep, I discovered it the hard way My programming blahblahblah blog. If you ever find anything useful here, please let me know to remove it. Re: C++ - "We don't use STL here" Chris Losinger24-Jun-05 5:50 Chris Losinger 24-Jun-05 5:50  hmm. i knew about the deque problem. didn't know about the others. Cleek | Image Toolkits | Thumbnail maker Re: C++ - "We don't use STL here" Trollslayer24-Jun-05 4:47 Trollslayer 24-Jun-05 4:47  I don't want to seem judgemental but he's an idiot or a C programmer who doesn't want to learn. Elaine The tigress is here Re: C++ - "We don't use STL here" Kevin McFarlane24-Jun-05 5:42 Kevin McFarlane 24-Jun-05 5:42  He was quite a clever guy. But he did seem to have a fondness, not so much for MFC, but for "C-style" C++. Lots of low-level methods, void*s and unnecessary dynamic allocations. But as his code generally seemed to work I guess his attitude is: if it ain't broke, don't fix it. Problem is it's not very friendly to the coder who has to understand his code. Kevin h323 connection to Cisco Call Manager 4.1 ? JankoH23-Jun-05 23:23 JankoH 23-Jun-05 23:23  Hello, does anybody of you know about how to connect to Cisco Call Manager 4.1(2) ? I'd like to monitor incomming calls... I don't want to use CiscoTSP, so the only? way to do this is SCCP, which communicates through h323 protocol. Are there any libraries which could I use ? (I found openh323 library, but no examples on how to use it). My biggest problem is the connection to call manager (Using TAPI 2.x and h323.tsp I was not able to change the IP addres where it should look for call manager) ...

Last Visit: 31-Dec-99 18:00     Last Update: 11-Jun-24 2:01 Refresh ᐊ Prev1...11280112811128211283112841128511286112871128811289 Next ᐅ

General    News    Suggestion    Question    Bug    Answer    Joke    Praise    Rant    Admin   

Use Ctrl+Left/Right to switch messages, Ctrl+Up/Down to switch threads, Ctrl+Shift+Left/Right to switch pages.