|
If you can access the Internet, you can go to http://msdn.microsoft.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
Strangely enough if you google createpolygonrgn the first listed linkage is TADA[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Did you ever realize that if you want to find help for a function on MSDN, it is much more efficient to use google than the MSDN search ? 
|
|
|
|
|
hey, MSDN site has been refactored, and i find it very very much powerful by now ! 
|
|
|
|
|
I only have the modem connection and google is quicker, MSDN takes at least a minute to load, the same again to return the list of linkages.
|
|
|
|
|
toxcct wrote: very very much powerful by now
But Speed the same na?
|
|
|
|
|
Cedric Moonen wrote: Did you ever realize that if you want to find help for a function on MSDN, it is much more efficient to use google than the MSDN search
You are right. I used to do so..
|
|
|
|
|
please help me to develope registry cleaner for window xp
|
|
|
|
|
do you want us to write the code for you ?
or you're stuck on a particular point ?
please ask a specific question !
|
|
|
|
|
it depends on what you want to do, to clean. 
to access to the registry there are many functions in the form Reg****Key, as RegOpenKeyEx, RegCloseKey, RegDeleteKey, RegSetValueEx, ...
Russell
|
|
|
|
|
Write to me. I accept paypal.
Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero
.·´¯`·->ßRÅhmmÃ<-·´¯`·.
|
|
|
|
|
brahmma wrote: Write to me. I accept paypal
classic...
me accept payment in kind (if his GF is correct enough) :->
|
|
|
|
|
I'm imagining you in a dark street, holding up a sign...
"Will code for nookie!"
Iain.
|
|
|
|
|
I am currently working on an asset register as a project and would like to acquire information on the hardware as well as software installed on a host
Can anyone help!!
Kim
|
|
|
|
|
kim007 wrote: I am currently working on an asset register as a project and would like to acquire information on the hardware as well as software installed on a host
Sounds fun. Good luck.
"A good athlete is the result of a good and worthy opponent." - David Crow
"To have a respect for ourselves guides our morals; to have deference for others governs our manners." - Laurence Sterne
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hello,
I have a major problem with the .h header files.
The Compiler (VS2003) does not seem to care about my function definition in the header file if implemented in another .cpp file.
Here is an example:
[myfunc.h]
#pragma once
int DLLInit(char* DLLInfo);
[myfunc.cpp]
#include "myfunc.h"
int DLLInit(int DLLInfoInt)
{
return 0;
}
I seem to be missing the whole point of a header file if the compiler does not detect the false declaration of variable name and type.... 
I want to include the header file in the project using the dll, too, so it is important to check parameter and type of function parameters, etc.
Maybe this is a very simple problem but I can't find a solution yet..
Any help?
thx in advance
|
|
|
|
|
sGrabert wrote: [myfunc.h]
#pragma once
int DLLInit(char* DLLInfo);
[myfunc.cpp]
#include "myfunc.h"
int DLLInit(int DLLInfoInt)
{
return 0;
}
check your code once again...
you declare a function that gets a char*, but you define a function that gets an int...
why the compiler wouldn't complain then ?
|
|
|
|
|
sGrabert wrote: I seem to be missing the whole point of a header file if the compiler does not detect the false declaration of variable name and type....
Why would it ? Function overloading is possible in C++ and you don't need to have a declaration for your functions. So, in your case you have a declaration of a function but no body for this function. As long as you don't call that function, everything will be fine. But once you call that function, you'll get a linker error.
So, actually, what is your real problem ? I don't understand what you are trying to achieve...
|
|
|
|
|
Cedric Moonen wrote: you have a declaration of a function but no body for this function. As long as you don't call that function, everything will be fine.
that's not true anymore under VS2005 AFAIK (but didn't tested actually)...
|
|
|
|
|
toxcct wrote: that's not true anymore under VS2005 AFAIK (but didn't tested actually)...
I never heard of that and I hardly imagine that...
Suppose that you have three files:
- One main.cpp that contains the main function
- One header file (file.h) that contains a function declaration
- One cpp file (file.cpp) that contains the function definition (of the previous function).
Suppose that you call this function in the main function. How can the compiler know, when compiling main.cpp that this function is actually defined in file.cpp ? What if you didn't include file.cpp in your project ?
Thus the error is generated at link time, when the linker cannot find the compiled function in the object files.
|
|
|
|
|
hum, actually, i was more saying that the compiler (or maybe the linker in fact) will throw a warning if you declare a function (in a .h mostly) that is never defined...
|
|
|
|
|
hum, actually, i was more saying that the compiler (or maybe the linker in fact) will throw a warning if you declare a function (in a .h mostly) that is never defined...
This is a helpfull warning indeed  , VS2003 fails to warn you about this.
|
|
|
|
|
No warning/error there either 
Mark Salsbery
Microsoft MVP - Visual C++
![Java | [Coffee]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/coffee.gif)
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
