Click here to Skip to main content
15,913,055 members
Home / Discussions / C / C++ / MFC
   

C / C++ / MFC

 
AnswerRe: undefined reference - please help with linker issue Pin
Richard Andrew x6411-Apr-24 9:25
professionalRichard Andrew x6411-Apr-24 9:25 
AnswerRe: undefined reference - please help with linker issue Pin
Richard MacCutchan11-Apr-24 21:01
mveRichard MacCutchan11-Apr-24 21:01 
QuestionBreak in a for loop Pin
Calin Negru11-Apr-24 1:19
Calin Negru11-Apr-24 1:19 
AnswerRe: Break in a for loop Pin
Mircea Neacsu11-Apr-24 1:28
Mircea Neacsu11-Apr-24 1:28 
AnswerRe: Break in a for loop Pin
Maximilien11-Apr-24 2:43
Maximilien11-Apr-24 2:43 
GeneralRe: Break in a for loop Pin
Calin Negru11-Apr-24 3:08
Calin Negru11-Apr-24 3:08 
GeneralRe: Break in a for loop Pin
CPallini11-Apr-24 4:17
mveCPallini11-Apr-24 4:17 
GeneralRe: Break in a for loop Pin
trønderen11-Apr-24 7:30
trønderen11-Apr-24 7:30 
GeneralRe: Break in a for loop Pin
Greg Utas11-Apr-24 7:50
professionalGreg Utas11-Apr-24 7:50 
AnswerRe: Break in a for loop Pin
BernardIE531717-Apr-24 12:01
BernardIE531717-Apr-24 12:01 
Question#define #undefine #define sequence result ? Pin
Salvatore Terress10-Apr-24 5:12
Salvatore Terress10-Apr-24 5:12 
AnswerRe: #define #undefine #define sequence result ? Pin
Mircea Neacsu10-Apr-24 5:14
Mircea Neacsu10-Apr-24 5:14 
AnswerRe: #define #undefine #define sequence result ? Pin
Richard MacCutchan10-Apr-24 6:36
mveRichard MacCutchan10-Apr-24 6:36 
AnswerRe: #define #undefine #define sequence result ? Pin
Salvatore Terress10-Apr-24 7:28
Salvatore Terress10-Apr-24 7:28 
AnswerRe: #define #undefine #define sequence result ? Pin
Salvatore Terress10-Apr-24 7:28
Salvatore Terress10-Apr-24 7:28 
Question#include - again Pin
Salvatore Terress5-Apr-24 5:06
Salvatore Terress5-Apr-24 5:06 
AnswerRe: #include - again Pin
Richard MacCutchan5-Apr-24 5:10
mveRichard MacCutchan5-Apr-24 5:10 
AnswerRe: #include - again Pin
Mircea Neacsu5-Apr-24 5:28
Mircea Neacsu5-Apr-24 5:28 
GeneralRe: #include - again Pin
trønderen5-Apr-24 6:01
trønderen5-Apr-24 6:01 
GeneralRe: #include - again Pin
trønderen5-Apr-24 6:14
trønderen5-Apr-24 6:14 
GeneralRe: #include - again Pin
Salvatore Terress10-Apr-24 5:03
Salvatore Terress10-Apr-24 5:03 
GeneralRe: #include - again Pin
trønderen10-Apr-24 6:53
trønderen10-Apr-24 6:53 
GeneralRe: #include - again Pin
BernardIE531717-Apr-24 12:11
BernardIE531717-Apr-24 12:11 
GeneralRe: #include - again Pin
k505410-Apr-24 6:35
mvek505410-Apr-24 6:35 
GeneralRe: #include - again Pin
trønderen10-Apr-24 7:11
trønderen10-Apr-24 7:11 
Yeah, that's what I expected.

I do not consider your example fully qualifying, though. I was speaking of "showing significant higher compilation times". I do not consider 600 and some milliseconds extra compilation time to be "significant".

If milliseconds really count, you might delete all sorts of 'copyleft'-like blurb in all your header files, reduce all whitespace to single spaces and use single/few character symbols wherever possible.

As I mentioned earlier, there are several good reasons against the "über" philosophy. I do not count saving 600 ms wall clock time as one of them.

Religious freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make five.

General General    News News    Suggestion Suggestion    Question Question    Bug Bug    Answer Answer    Joke Joke    Praise Praise    Rant Rant    Admin Admin   

Use Ctrl+Left/Right to switch messages, Ctrl+Up/Down to switch threads, Ctrl+Shift+Left/Right to switch pages.