|
I am assuming the compiler will parse the Macro with options in question and produce a .i file If I reanme to a .c The debugger will use that source code
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, that's the idea. I use this technique when debugging macro code. The problem you're experiencing is just one reason why macros should be avoided if possible.
Steve
|
|
|
|
|
Cool I an Assembler MVS internals guy I found some intresting project that helped me learn C/C++
Since you seem to be on really good at this Visual C any ideas how I can become better at it
|
|
|
|
|
I guess just practice and read.
Steve
|
|
|
|
|
Thankx But unfortantly the code in question is in .h file anything to parse that out
|
|
|
|
|
That's no problem: you pre-preprocess the C/CPP file(s) that include it.
Steve
|
|
|
|
|
Okay you have been very helpfull thankx much
|
|
|
|
|
I got the parsed out listing rename it to .c however doesn't seem like I am able to make a breakpoint or at least have Visual studio Stop at the Macro like it did without the preprocessor listing
|
|
|
|
|
I tried to send you this message but looks I sent it to myself
anyway here goes
I got the parsed out listing rename it to .c however doesn't seem like I am able to make a breakpoint or at least have Visual studio Stop at the Macro like it did without the preprocessor listing
|
|
|
|
|
At this stage the easiest thing to do would be to rename the original file, place the pre-preprocessed file in the same location and rename it so it's used instead of the original file. Place breakpoints in this file: all macros have been expanded.
Steve
|
|
|
|
|
I did that meaning make a breakpoint with the renamed .i file
The code above it gets excuted a millon times so can'nt move the breakpoint further up
Maybe I should rebuild with renamed .i file which has the parsed code
|
|
|
|
|
ForNow wrote: Maybe I should rebuild with renamed .i file which has the parsed code
I took that as given; sorry, perhaps I should have been more explicit. To rebuild with the pre-preprocessed file replacing the original file is the whole point.
Steve
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, without the /P and /C options added to produce the pre-preprocessed files.
Steve
|
|
|
|
|
|
Just had a thought since my problem is in the included file what say I use the /FI compile option and ForceIncludedFiles Am i way off base with this or is the ForceIncludedFiles for C++ methods while basically the code a I debugging is in C
Thankx Again
|
|
|
|
|
Hello everybody,
I'm writing a GINA replacement (more like a stub ATM) and I was wondering if there was any way I could run a process as SYSTEM without registering it as a service e.g. starting "notepad.exe" at user logon but as SYSTEM.
Please feel free to drop any hints 
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all, I'm looking for a third-party Outlook-style calendar component that can be built into our product. It needs to be in C++ but I'm not looking for any .Net components and better not MFC, because that will increase the cost of the integration. I was just looking at a product called 'Xtreme Calendar pro' and it looks quite nice just that it's for MFC. Anyone got any other ideas? Thanks.
-- modified at 21:37 Tuesday 27th February, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
viksoe has a WTL Outlook bar implementation; WTL is very light weight, so it would fit nicely with your requirements.
You can get the code from his website here Viksoe outlook bar[^]
-- modified at 16:23 Tuesday 27th February, 2007
Sorry - I read your post, and "thought" Outlook bar, not calendar control, he also has a Calendar control on his site here: Calendar Control[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Dear Author,
I appreciate all the efforts you took to get this site up and running but i dont like the way you have developed the forum section.
when anyone who replies to any post, then that post should come up on the top whereas new messages keep on adding and the old message goes back to 3-4 pages and most of us dont even care to look more then 2-3 pages back.
For instance look at this forum site,
http://www.nabble.com/port-xen-f12400.html
How beautifully they have managed it without making it a mess, whereas this site forum just looks a big mess.
Please take steps to change the design of this forum as we all need this great forum but would appreciate its proper use.
Thanks and Regards
SSpecialist
|
|
|
|
|
Good one... coming from someone that can't even find the correct forum[^] to post his comment in. 
led mike
|
|
|
|
|
yeh if u can find the correct one den go n do it as i dont have much time...i browse to only this forum so i have posted here..I cant be asked to look for correct place in such a messy site..
|
|
|
|
|
Software_Specialist wrote: I cant be asked to look for correct place in such a messy site..
Please find some other good site (in your opinion).
Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero
ப்ரம்மா
|
|
|
|
|
No this is a good site but messy...DO YOU UNDERSTAND ENGLISH..and i cant be asked to look for new forums and then again spending time in becoming member, entering different ids 10-15 times and then going back to mail id and enabling the forum and all the pains.....i am too busy for that..well do you think its nicely developed....or u just replying to get into action...
Dont waste time m8s....do some good work and let the Author of the site reply to this...or you go and post it to correct place
|
|
|
|
|
Software_Specialist wrote: and i cant be asked to look for new forums and then again spending time in becoming member, entering different ids 10-15 times and then going back to mail id and enabling the forum and all the pains
What forum enabling ? All the forums are accessible by default to all registered users; and why would you need to re-register yourself more than once ?
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
