|
Saksida Bojan wrote: After eyecting a media from CD drive, sometimes i got a stupid message to insert CD into that drive. or even during instalation a game with 2 or more CD. No matter how many time i press contiune or cancel it keep poping up.
I also used to face this problem before. But it based on the situation of your application. The problem that i face before is the time that windows still use the file or resource on the CD but i try to eject it out. So windows ask for the CD with the correct resource in order to finalize its task. Or when you install an application, some feature are pending to be install like Ms office. Any feature that you try to use for the first time then it will ask to install from the CDROM.
Saksida Bojan wrote: How can i disable this anoying message?
In my opinion, you should notify which is the CD that you install and cause this problem. Then try to insert that CD in order to transfer some file that windows might require afte the installation.
|
|
|
|
|
We use Active Directory on a Windows 2000 server and Microsoft Exchange. Our workstations are mix of OS from Windows 98 to XP Pro. Our Microsoft Office versions also vary from 2000 to XP to 2003. My problem is that I need users to be able to logon on to any machine and be able to read their mail without coming to me to go and set up the properties of outlook/exchange to change the user. I have found some scripts etc to find out the current user, to get details from the Active Directory but I have not been able so far to find how to change the mailbox setting from a script.
Has anybody any idea?
Regards
Robert T Turner
|
|
|
|
|
You may be able to use a transform file. I think the office resource kits have a way to build one. By configuring its settings, outlook can change when a new users logs in. I use it with NT4, 2K, and XP... Not too sure if it works with 98. It might if you are using profiles.
The network is down...let's go get bagels.
|
|
|
|
|
For some reason applications seem to have started crashing when I access a file using the open dialog. The files themselves are relativly large (> 500mb) but I have a 3.2Ghz pentium with 1Gb of RAM which I would assume could handle it.
I've tried defragmenting the hard drive and scanned for viruses and spyware and searched google but most of the posts are general windows explorer 'slowness'. Windows explorer on my PC isn't slow its just when browsing via the open dialog.
SuzyB
If I had a better memory I would remember more.
|
|
|
|
|
Suzanne Boyle wrote:
The files themselves are relativly large (> 500mb) but I have a 3.2Ghz pentium with 1Gb of RAM which I would assume could handle it.
Your system is very high but you have a problem with open the file. In my opinion, i don't think this problem cause from the file size. Imagine if you play the video in windows media player, some file consume 600MB on the CD space. But the video still can play. Here are two recommendation that you should check it out:
1. If the file is locate on the network, try to check your system administrator for the network traffic. When the resource are accessed with a lot of connection which is overload the machine capability, you will have a problem with accessing the resource that you need.
2. If the file is located on your computer, try to check your computer for bad sector. Sometime the file is located on the bad sector of your computer hard disk. So when you try access the file, an operating system will try to read the file from bad sector which consume you a lot of time.
Good luck
|
|
|
|
|
I tried checking the drives for errors but came up with nothing. I'm going to try switching off some services and startup apps and see if that works.
SuzyB
If I had a better memory I would remember more.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
We have an environment in production with Windows 2003 and I’m thinking of installing Windows XP (SP2) on my local pc instead of Windows 2000 or should I install Windows 2003. Cost is not an issue.
Witch do you recommend?
What kind and version of OS do you develop your applications in?
|
|
|
|
|
zupermac wrote:
Cost is not an issue
W2k3 should be the best one, I think.
I'm using W2K for developing.
<< >>
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, but isn’t it hard to get W2K3 going well with all the different hardware on a company?
I mean, me and my colleges doesn’t have the same computer hardware configuration.
|
|
|
|
|
hi,
what problem u r getting while trying to get W2K3 working with ur hardware?
zupermac wrote:
me and my colleges doesn’t have the same computer hardware configuration
can u explain more on this?
<< >>
|
|
|
|
|
I know there's a reason this ins't working and I think it has to do with "'s in the command but everything I've tried isn't working.
You guys see how to fix this so it does actually dump the .sql the way I want it to?
@ECHO ON
C:\Progra~1\SWsoft\Plesk\MySQL\bin>mysqldump --user=Admin --password={PASSWORD} --single-transaction petsforums vb3petsaccess > D:\SQL\vb3petsaccess.sql
C:\Progra~1\SWsoft\Plesk\MySQL\bin>mysqldump --user=Admin --password={PASSWORD} --single-transaction petsforums vb3petsadminhelp > D:\SQL\vb3petsadminhelp.sql
C:\Progra~1\SWsoft\Plesk\MySQL\bin>mysqldump --user=Admin --password={PASSWORD} --single-transaction petsforums vb3petsadministrator > D:\SQL\vb3petsadministrator.sql
C:\Progra~1\SWsoft\Plesk\MySQL\bin>mysqldump --user=Admin --password={PASSWORD} --single-transaction petsforums vb3petsadminlog > D:\SQL\vb3petsadminlog.sql
C:\Progra~1\SWsoft\Plesk\MySQL\bin>mysqldump --user=Admin --password={PASSWORD} --single-transaction petsforums vb3petsadminutil > D:\SQL\vb3petsadminutil.sql
@ECHO OFF
My name is Inigo Montoya, you killed my process, prepare to die. Slightly modified quote from Princess Bride.
Code-frog System Architects, Inc.
-- modified at 16:10 Friday 9th September, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
It could help if you told us what exactly "it isn't working" means.
|
|
|
|
|
@ECHO ON
mysqldump.exe --user=Admin --password=NOT --single-transaction petsforums vb3petsaccess > D:\SQL\vb3petsaccess.sql
mysqldump.exe --user=Admin --password=NOT --single-transaction petsforums vb3petsadminhelp > D:\SQL\vb3petsadminhelp.sql
mysqldump.exe --user=Admin --password=NOT --single-transaction petsforums vb3petsadministrator > D:\SQL\vb3petsadministrator.sql
mysqldump.exe --user=Admin --password=NOT --single-transaction petsforums vb3petsadminlog > D:\SQL\vb3petsadminlog.sql
mysqldump.exe --user=Admin --password=NOT --single-transaction petsforums vb3petsadminutil > D:\SQL\vb3petsadminutil.sql
@ECHO OFF
This works!!!
Dropped off the crap as you suggested and all is well.
My name is Inigo Montoya, you killed my process, prepare to die. Slightly modified quote from Princess Bride.
Code-frog System Architects, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, BTW:
if this "C:\Progra~1\SWsoft\Plesk\MySQL\bin>" is part of your batch file, remove it. This is part of the command prompt.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, could you configure load balancing by inserting an Apache in front of a number of application servers running IIS, serving the same application? I don't think "Reverse Proxy" (... a simple tutorial here...) can do this, correct me if I'm wrong.
Thanks in advance.
-- modified at 22:09 Thursday 8th September, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
I need a null printer driver - something that installs as a device, looks just like a normal printer device, but everything sent to it goes to the null device / bit bucket. Any ideas where I can find something like this?
C. Gilley
Will program for food...
Whoever said children were cheaper by the dozen... lied.
|
|
|
|
|
Have you tried selecting 'Properties' of your existing printer driver and setting the port to 'NUL:'?
"An education isn't how much you have committed to memory, or even how much you know. It's being able to differentiate between what you do know and what you don't." - Anatole France
|
|
|
|
|
Just add a sample printer from a list of printer model. Any document that send to this printer will keep in it printing queue.
|
|
|
|
|
please tell me the basic difference in fat32 and ntfs systems
i am a student of MSc computer science at quaid-e-azam university islamabad pakistan , "help to all"
|
|
|
|
|
FAT32 is an evolutionary improvement on FAT16 and FAT12 used in the early days of personal computing; NTFS is an entirely new approach to file management. FAT32 uses 32 bits per entry in the file allocation table (FAT), though only 28 bits are actually used. It is efficient for drives up to 16GB in size, as up to that level it uses 8Kb clusters. Above that size it switches to 16Kb clusters, at which point the file overhead becomes less efficient than NTFS. It also lacks all of the file security features available in NTFS.
NTFS is based on a database called the Master File Table (MFT) and includes file-level security options not previously available. Unlike FATxx, which writes the FAT in the first sector of the drive, NTFS keeps the MFT on the last sector and, IIRC, keeps a spare copy in the middle of the drive. NTFS is also crash resistant, as disk writes are logged, and if the system crashes incomplete writes are reconstructed from the log and rewritten. While it's still not recommended, shutting down a system with the power switch will rarely cause a data loss using NTFS. The newer system also adds file security capability, and automatic file encryption/decrytion as an option.
All in all, if you have logical drives bigger than 16 GB, NTFS is the recommended choice.
"...a photo album is like Life, but flat and stuck to pages." - Shog9
|
|
|
|
|
|
The USB driver in my PC used to work properly. But since I done some low level
operations the previously worked flash disk doesn't working anymore. And when I plug the flash disk in the port, I got prompt for "found new hardware wizard". Neither options in that dialog lead to success!
|
|
|
|
|
LiYS wrote: I got prompt for "found new hardware wizard"
What happend after this message appear?
LiYS wrote: But since I done some low level
operations the previously worked flash disk doesn't working anymore. And when I plug the flash disk in the port
Try to test your flash drive with another computer with USB port. It is not working, then it mean your flash drive is broken and you need to have a new one. But if it detect as normal, you should check your system whether it is there is any problem with your system driver. Try to use the command sfc /scannow in the command prompt in order to check for any corrupt file system in your computer. Before you use the sfc command you should have windows CD in your hand because it might ask you to put in the CDROM in order to replace some corrupt that its found during the scan time.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Roath:
I almost forgot this thread, It reminds me things happened last year and people I knew. Actually I posted this message when I was in my "previous" job. It was just several months ago, but for me it seems happened in distant past. Thanks again!
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
![Rose | [Rose]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/rose.gif)