|
I published an article in partnership with another person. I’m the author and this person the co-author. In the first article versions, the author's name (my name) was shown first. But after some updates, the co-author’s name and his picture started being displayed in first place.
I tried to update the article several times, adding comments to the editors, explaining it, but there was no result.
I tried to remove the co-author, and then added it again in a new update, but it did not work either.
The article: Developing a Private Network Connection iOS App exploring OpenVPN Protocol
Could someone help me to fix it?
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks very much for your message. Unfortunately, we are unable to change the order. Author order is decided by member ID number, and is something we cannot change. The only way to achieve this would be to remove the co-author and place a bio in the article itself. Or possibly to create a new CodeProject account that has a higher ID number, but I would like to test this out first to see if it works.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
The author id (my id) is 9465228. The co-author is 11051825. (mine is older).
Strange, beacuse the order switched during the article updates. In first revisions my name was displayed first.
When I'm editing and click in "preview" or when I save a draft, the order is shown correctly, but after publish it changes.
modified 28-Jun-21 9:00am.
|
|
|
|
|
I tried to create a new user and added it to the article but not worked. This new one became the last shown.
I start to think that order is related to member reputation.
|
|
|
|
|
It does appear that way. Unfortunately reputation can't be manipulated, only created organically. I think the only way to achieve what you want is to include the other author's bio in the body of the article itself.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
@Sean-Ewington
please have a look: CoViD Spread Simulation (without SIR equations)[^]
I asked him why not to delete it if it is obsolete and has no content... I suppose he is still learning how the site works.
Maybe have some words with him?
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek wrote: I suppose he is still learning how the site works.
Yes, he has only been a member for 6 years and 10 months. 
|
|
|
|
|
You told it, not me  
Jokes apart... he is member for a time, but his first publication was this one and not so long ago. And I remember him having "rookie" problems in that too.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Sean
1) Anything you want, but, in my opinion, you should have warned me before deleting my item.
2) In your messages the word "him" appears many times. that's very bad! It is clear that there is you (a small elite of 'enlightened') and all the others. This is the very last thing that needs to be done to create a real community
|
|
|
|
|
I apologize. Our focus on maintaining article quality is of the upmost of importance to CodeProject. We cannot have articles on the homepage and in newsletters that exist only to link to other articles.
In the future, please feel free to reach out to me and ask about our site capability and functionality before making major changes to your articles.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Perhaps my English is not good enough
I do not discuss the choices of the site
Before canceling my job I had to be notified.
I would have asked for the rollback and re-established the old article
|
|
|
|
|
If you would like, we can take the formatting of the new article, revive the old article, and place it in that revived one, the delete the newest one.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
1) I am not Sean.
2) the word "him" has nothing to do with "small elite of enlightened". How am I suppose to speak about a person with another one without using the gramatical 3rd person?
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
We have been having words, I'm afraid. I'm not sure my words are working. Thank you for pointing this out. While I appreciate his desire, this isn't a good look for the site.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
His suggestion could be a good idea though
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
How to Start a Robust C# Project in the New Nullable Context with Generics?[^]
I think it has been revised, but the technical quality is really poor, and some of the author's assertions are absurd, even grandiose. The code examples are still opaque, and not explained fully.
The author's now angry [^]: I hope my advice [^] was constructive.
«One day it will have to be officially admitted that what we have christened reality is an even greater illusion than the world of dreams.» Salvador Dali
|
|
|
|
|
I'm taking a gamble on this one. Let's try and guide him. Hopefully over time he approves this article, and improves his next one.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
My first response, to the first draft, was an attempt at constructive advice, not a down-vote; only when his response to my comment included his assertion that if the code examples had problems we could help him spot them did I realize he really had no clue what an article was. At that point, I did down-vote, and, as I believe is a responsible thing to do, did not down-vote anonymously.
By removing my first comment, and his response to it, the context has been muddied.
Hopefully, some other members here will weigh in on the technical value of the current content, and, register their opinions.
«One day it will have to be officially admitted that what we have christened reality is an even greater illusion than the world of dreams.» Salvador Dali
modified 25-Jun-21 13:40pm.
|
|
|
|
|
I have pointed him to the faqs and suggested him to get a mentor. Let's see...
But he looks more to be the kind of guy that don't really pay attention to what it is said and takes it a bit personal / emotional.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I wonder why my first message to him, and his response to it, was deleted, but, my "vote of 1" message was not deleted.Nelek wrote: he looks more to be the kind of guy that don't really pay attention to what it is said and takes it a bit personal / emotional.
Speaking as a formerly board-certified member of the American Academy for Group Psychotherapy and Psychodrama (I'm not kidding), I concur with your diagnosis, Dr. Nelek 
«One day it will have to be officially admitted that what we have christened reality is an even greater illusion than the world of dreams.» Salvador Dali
|
|
|
|
|
Trying to publish a new article I got this message
«Too many attributes. There is a limit of 8.»
But, what an attribute is?
What does this message expect me to do?
Can anyone, please explain to me how can I fix this issue?
Cheers
|
|
|
|
|
attributes are the name we use in our code for tags
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
Might be a good idea to update the error message to use the terminology you display to the user, rather than the terminology you use in the code.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Richard
I agree with you 100%
(That is common mistake developers do.)
Cheers
|
|
|
|
|
Hi
I found the answer by myself: at the beginning of the page where the article is edited, under the section "A 1-line description." there is the "Tags" input region.
The list in the input field was too long.
Once remove some items it was possible to publish the article.
Cheers
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
