|
I closed Chrome (browser I was using to edit) entirely.
Well, whenever it lets go, I guess all will be good.
Thanks,
|
|
|
|
|
Seems OK now on my end. You?
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
You got it!!!
Thanks very much. all the source and images are there too.
Great!
|
|
|
|
|
Java SE 8 new features tour: Processing Collections with Streams API[^] needs some help
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
All fixed
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Chris
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
When on a revision waiting to be published, if you hit "delete" does it delete just that revision or the article as a whole? Curious because I wanted to delete an erroneously submitted revision but didn't want to risk the article as a whole.
|
|
|
|
|
If you delete it from the approval queue it "should" just delete that draft. However, if you you want to play it safe I could simply roll back to a particular revision for you.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the info! I actually went ahead and submitted the "old" revision afterwards with an editor note so everything is back to normal. I was more curious for the future.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I've fixed
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks. Look good.
Bryian Tan
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proof-reading this (upcoming) article will be greatly appreciated...
Demo Data[^]
...also suggestions for proper tagging (C# alone isn't that much)...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
This would-be blog: DotNetAnywhere: An Alternative .NET Runtime[^] has "sunglasses needed" disease!
Could you tidy the code blocks for him? @Sean-Ewington
I'd suggest it to him, but there is no forum on would-be blogs to do that...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Now approved without changes. Some people obviously don't bother scrolling down before clicking "approve". 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Topic have been risen several times but so far no changes 
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Beautified.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Hello! I recently made some valuable (to my opinion) updates to my article, but it did not go to the top of the list. At the same time I remember that some of my articles were moved to the top after even minor updates. So what is the criterion for the article to be moved to the top after being updated? Also as far as I understand, few points should have been awarded for editing the article, which also did not happen. Is it a issue with the site?
modified 15-Oct-17 13:28pm.
|
|
|
|
|
There is a check box at the bottom of the article editor:
Mark this article as updated?
If that is not checked the update time stamp of the article is not set and the updated article will not be shown in the list of updated / new articles.
Having a look at your articles shows that the last update was on Jun 30 2017. So you might have not set that check box. But the revision history shows updates: Implementing Dynamic Resources with Direct3D12[^].
I don't know for sure if no points are awarded when the article is not marked as updated (I'm a normal member like you and not site staff).
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you for the suggestion, but I cannot really find this checkbox. I only see two checkboxes in my editor: I have read and agree to the contributor's agreement and Work in progress: don't publish. I used text search on the page to make sure I did not miss it.
I asked about the points because this is not the first time it happened, and last time there was a problem with the site, so this may be somehow related this time.
|
|
|
|
|
It is below the 'Work in progress' checkbox.
If you don't see that it might be bug.
|
|
|
|
|
|
It looks different for me. Besides the missing update check box I have also a "Expert mode: Don't mess with my HTML formatting" which is missing in your screenshot too.
You should wait for an answer from the site staff or issue a bug report in the Bugs and Suggestions[^] forum.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
