|
It depends how you want to mark it. Move your mouse over the word "Solution" or the stars at the top, or the flags at the bottom. The popup messages should help you.
|
|
|
|
|
I do not see the word "Solution", stars, or flags - see <a href="https://www.codeproject.com/Messages/5838074/Re-How-do-I-create-xy-plots-with-WPF-APP-NET-Frame">Re: How do I create xy plots with WPF APP (.NET Framework)? - WPF Discussion Boards</a>[<a href="https://www.codeproject.com/Messages/5838074/Re-How-do-I-create-xy-plots-with-WPF-APP-NET-Frame" target="_blank" title="New Window">^</a>]
|
|
|
|
|
That is a forum message; I assumed you were referring to a Quick Answers Solution. But it is not really clear what you want to do. If you just want to show the question has been resolved, then you should edit the original message and add "[Solved]" to the title.
|
|
|
|
|
curious: Get Chunky Now[^]
«The mind is not a vessel to be filled but a fire to be kindled» Plutarch
|
|
|
|
|
Theoretically any votes you got while the article was in moderation shouldn't count. I'm actually not sure if your articles would go into moderation. But at least according to the server times listed here, your article went live 2:56 and the first vote came in at 4:16.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
thanks, Sean, Perhaps i did a revision, but, hadn't submitted it yet.
cheers, Bill
«The mind is not a vessel to be filled but a fire to be kindled» Plutarch
|
|
|
|
|
Sean Ewington wrote: I'm actually not sure if your articles would go into moderation.
they should not, he has more than rep enough besides the badgets.
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Is there a forum that handles C# WPF questions?
|
|
|
|
|
|
you can search on google by using this query intext:"c# wpf"
|
|
|
|
|
My common email adr is <cte677@gmail.com>.
When I request an password sent to <cte677@gmail.com>, I see "Unable to find your information."
When I attempt to create an account using <cte677@gmail.com>, I see "This email is in use."
Please advise.
|
|
|
|
|
This kind of message should go to the Bugs and Suggestions[^] forum.
Maybe @Sean-Ewington or @Chris-Maunder can move it there and dig a bit about it?
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm afraid I don't see an account under the email. Is there another email you might have used?
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Nope. Can <cte677@gmail.com> 1) be restored, or 2) deleted so I can create a new account with that email adr? Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
Because I cannot access it, I cannot restore or delete it, I'm afraid.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
|
I've passed this off to the dev team and they say you should be able to create an account now.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Same problem. Is there a way to attach screen captures?
|
|
|
|
|
Hmm. Please try one more time.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Also have a login problem here, thank you for making this thread discussion
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Katelyn,
Are you still having problems logging in?
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since noone here has posted this advice, which is actually not that astonishing in itself but since "here" is the "Article Writing" forum where a cpian such as myself, who has never "written" an article, can post feelings about articles and who doesn't know the whole story as a result. When an article goes into moderation for approval it recieves votes which on any given parametric pillar fall to either side of the post's approval space.
To insure that the "article" (using that term in a general sense for "post") is published, always package along with the VERBOSE explanation of any code, a VS project that will compile and run as an executable on a Windows computer.
Since I don't use any compiler other than VS and run an operating system other than Windows I can't speak for other venues delving into code.
modified 1-Oct-21 14:51pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators constantly review Articles that should be Tips/Tricks (modest little pieces of code, sometimes with much to be modest about) or Projects ("this repository is the cat's ass and does <cursory description> <link>").
If the page where you land after clicking the home page's "POST AN ARTICLE[^]" was beefed up to explain what is expected in this regard, a lot of wasted time might be saved.
|
|
|
|
|
Article is the default... if it weren't, it probably would reduce the amount too.
Either empty option and forcing the selection of one, or directly Tip/Trick as default and forcing the active selection of "article". This way no poster could say: "I didn't see/know it"
Maybe post it in the B&S Forum?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
