|
I understand you wanted to make a commercial advertisement of a shrink-wrap commercial software product. I would suggest you check out CodeProject MediaKit here for more info:
http://www.codeproject.com/info/MediaKit.aspx[^]
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
Personal Homepage
Tech Gossips
A pessimist sees only the dark side of the clouds, and mopes; a philosopher sees both sides, and shrugs; an optimist doesn't see the clouds at all - he's walking on them. --Leonard Louis Levinson
|
|
|
|
|
Don't spam these forums with advertisement.
"I guess it's what separates the professionals from the drag and drop, girly wirly, namby pamby, wishy washy, can't code for crap types." - Pete O'Hanlon
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all,
I have a gridview in which i used button field to delete record from database on "onrowcommand" event of gridview. It works properly. But I want confirmation of delete before deleting record from database on client click. so i think for that i need to call javascript confirm box on click and if it returns true then only onrowcommand event of control to be executed. Is it possible that way.if yes then suggest the code otherwise suggest another way.
<asp:gridview id="GridView1" runat="server" allowpaging="True" autogeneratecolumns="False">
DataKeyNames="ID" DataSourceID="SqlDataSource1" PageSize="15" AllowSorting="True" OnRowCommand = "GridView1_RowCommand" CellPadding="4" ForeColor="#333333" GridLines="None" style="width: 100%">
<columns> <asp:buttonfield buttontype="Image" commandname="delete_property_details" headertext="DeleteDetails">
Text="Delete" ImageUrl="~/images/deleteicon.jpg">
<controlstyle font-names="Verdana" font-size="10pt">
protected void GridView1_RowCommand(object sender, GridViewCommandEventArgs e)
{
if (e.CommandName == "delete_property_details")
{
int index = Convert.ToInt16(e.CommandArgument);
other code placed here
}
}
|
|
|
|
|
In the ItemDataBound event you can add a confirm dialog to a button like so:
deleteButton.Attributes.Add("onClick", "return confirm('Confirm that you want to delete this record!');");
|
|
|
|
|
Hello everyone,
I have just found out that page-break-before works in IE6 but not IE7. Does anyone know if there is a solution or work-around for this?
Thanks and Happy New Year!
Yenyen
|
|
|
|
|
Don't use IE7.
(This is one of the reasons I made MVP in 2007 - I give the obvious answers to seemingly difficult questions.)
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funny how you could use such simple keywords in google and get desired results, while I used complicated bla-bla-bla keywords and cracking my head to get the results 
Thanks! I will read out and try out.
Cheers!
|
|
|
|
|
usually we made localhost in VS 2003 and run it on LAN
how to do for visual studio 2005??
Any Movie, Software, Song, Game and many more.... Only at Developer's Solution
http://www.devsol.co.nr
Search Any Torrent You Want
A Software for Torrent search only....
Must check it
...VAIBHAV SARAN
vikysaran@gmail.com
|
|
|
|
|
Vaibhav Saran wrote: how to do for visual studio 2005??
You can do the same in VS 2005. Actually, there are two options for creating webproject in VS 2005. One is "File System based" and other is "Localhost". If you choose "localhost", it will create the directory in IIS and can be called from other machine.. If you choose "File System", the port of your website will be(might be) changed each time the website is run . If you want the port not to change, set "False" to "Use dynamic ports" of the property of your webproject.
Hope it helps.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for you kind reply Mr. Michael.
My application is working now. The error was due to my application automatically selected .Net framework 1
I modified that to 2 and it worked great.
I posted a thread on MSDN forum also with a screenshot how to do the stuff here at...
http://forums.microsoft.com/msdn/showpost.aspx?postid=177088&siteid=1&sb=0&d=1&at=7&ft=11&tf=0&pageid=1[^]
you can see a post here by vikysaran@gmail.com
Any Movie, Software, Song, Game and many more.... Only at Developer's Solution
http://www.devsol.co.nr
Search Any Torrent You Want
A Software for Torrent search only....
Must check it
...VAIBHAV SARAN
vikysaran@gmail.com
|
|
|
|
|
I have set up a PayPal button so that on successful payment, the return address is a clickonce setup.exe file to install an application. I have done this previously without any problem.
However, this time (and I have created several test buttons) instead of the usual dialog box, I get one that gives me the option of either saving the file or searching online for an application that will run it. It looks like the .exe extension is being ignored and, if I select save, it gets saved as Setup and not Setup.exe.
However,if I navigate directly to the setup.exe file, without using the PayPal button, it works perfectly.
The only difference with the PayPal button (encrypted) to the ones I have used before is that it uses a custom image. Tried removing that but no change.
I am using IE7 and the application is .net 2.
Does anyone have any ideas why the .exe extension seems to be getting ignored?
Cheers,
Rich
|
|
|
|
|
Rich Leyshon wrote: clickonce setup.exe
Actually, if you are using ClickOnce, you should call "***.application" (e.g. http://yourdomain.com/installers/myapplication.application ) instead of setup.exe.
|
|
|
|
|
Red faced thank you ...
Guess I should read more documentation but setup.exe always worked for me in the past.
Cheers,
Rich
|
|
|
|
|
|
Why did you post this three times?
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
When he said 'a question' he meant 'three questions'. Identical ones.
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
"also I don't think "TranslateOneToTwoBillion OneHundredAndFortySevenMillion FourHundredAndEightyThreeThousand SixHundredAndFortySeven()" is a very good choice for a function name" - SpacixOne ( offering help to someone who really needed it ) ( spaces added for the benefit of people running at < 1280x1024 )
|
|
|
|
|
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: Why did you post this three times?
How do you know that, you can't count that high can you?  Ah my first one of the new year. Now that I've gotten that out of the way 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
i am really very sorry for such act actually when i posted the message my page got expired i thought may the message is not posted successfully but in this confusion my question posted more then one time ....once again i am sorry next time it wont happen
|
|
|
|
|
Don't mind them...it happens. And if he would have looked at the time signatures on the thread posts, he would have realized that your double post was actually an accidental "double tap" of the submit.
...Since you realize now that you double posted, go ahead and delete one of the threads and someone might answer.
"I need build Skynet. Plz send code"
|
|
|
|
|
|
Smashing_Perfect wrote: try to do on my own both of them gets disabled
What you have to do is that just disabling the textbox based on radiobutton click..
Can you show us the code that you have done so far for that part?
|
|
|
|
|
I have a page on a website that contains a form. The form posts back to itself when the submit button is pressed.
If the data is acceptable/valid, the page in question displays content that tells the user he submitted valid data (the form is not displayed). All is well.
However, if the user hits the BACK button in the browser, the browser displays a dialog box that says the page contains post data and blah blah blah the world is going to end blah blah blah. When I click OK in that dialog, the form is displayed again.
I've tried useing this
unset($POST);
after processing the data, but that doesn't get rid of the interim dialog box.
Is there a way to keep the browser from showing that without resorting to a separate "result" page that handles the form's data?
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
