|
Actually, I just switched to dynamic, and it's pretty quick for me, even at 50 articles. Threaded is still timing out all over the place.
--
Where are we going? And why am I in this handbasket?
|
|
|
|
|
Ok.. i'm a liar... Threaded has suddenly started working better. It's still slower than Dynamic for some reason, but it's not timing out anymore...
Chris must be playing a joke...
--
Where are we going? And why am I in this handbasket?
|
|
|
|
|
Dear CPians,
I have been using CP for a year, more or less, and I have found alot of help on this amazing developers community. I believe that the reason that this community is working well is the fact that there are some outstanding programmers that devote many hours of their day to post good quality articles and answer to questions on the message boards. This makes bad authors and bad behaviour on message boards a big problem...
I have noticed, as most of you have, that some people are posting bad quality articles. Not to mention that many of them are dividing their regular size article into many "PARTS" in order to have more articles posted on here, and thats how we end up with PARTS OF ARTICLES that in some cases wont make a 800x600 resolution screen to scroll.
I understand that if the article posting forms are removed some qood authors will not be able to post their quality articles. Not to metnion that Chris and all the rest of the quys will have to go through every single article and manually post them (which is a huge problem).
So what I suggest?
Each member could have a limit of how many articles he/she can post. Lets say 1 to start with.
Then, the member should earn the right to post more articles by some or all of the following aspects:
1) good behaviour on message boards.
2) numbers of message posting.
3) article rating.
...and if you could come up with anything else...
I would like to believe that this will make people to write better articles and improve their behaviour on the message boards.
Regards.
theJazzyBrain
Excelence is not an act, but a habbit Aristotle
|
|
|
|
|
What if I write an article on .. say 'Embeded System' and I dont have an audience there.
Should I wait for 'some new rules' to allow me to post another article of good interest?!?!?!
Let the articles / submissions be there... u have the forum for the articles... if u do or dont like them, put ur comments there... Let the author come up with an updated version...
Ahhh!!! I have an idea,
If we find that the article is of a form, where we dont like it, we can rate that down, and this should now allow the user to post new article, unless he removes the article away or he updates the article!!!
I was born intelligent Education ruined me!.
|
|
|
|
|
SPS wrote:
What if I write an article on .. say 'Embeded System' and I dont have an audience there
I agree, I realise that this won't be fair for not very popular (but still good quality) articles. Thats why I also mentioned that the number of message posts might influence too.
And as you said, if an article is bad then the author could update it or delete it and post a new one.
theJazzyBrain
Excelence is not an act, but a habbit Aristotle
|
|
|
|
|
theJazzyBrain wrote:
if an article is bad then the author could update it or delete it and post a new one.
can i rewrite that as,
if an article is bad then the author SHOULD update it or delete it and post a new one
I was born intelligent Education ruined me!.
|
|
|
|
|
I agree...
Was just trying to be polite...
theJazzyBrain
Excelence is not an act, but a habbit Aristotle
|
|
|
|
|
cheers,
Super
------------------------------------------
Too much of good is bad,mix some evil in it
|
|
|
|
|
This is a place to share ideas. If you flood it with too much regulation... it may lose the appeal . I strongly believe the rating should be the motivating factor to push the author to write better articles.
|
|
|
|
|
Abdul (Rajib) Bahar wrote:
This is a place to share ideas
I do agree with this... but we should make sure that the articles are updated to the levels - that most of the people can be benifited with it. It should not be just another article from the author - rather it should be meaningfull
I was born intelligent Education ruined me!.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello Sir,
I have been assigned a task to auto mate a school system. i.e. Timetabling issues, Teacher Replacemts, Employee Attendances(HR), Exam control and Student Records...
although .. i have analysed almost everything.. database tables are finalized as well...
but coz of being untouch with all this development issue since a year.. i am just strugling as to how and where to start design and development of the software....?
if anyone having idea about this kind of software? please help me ...
or i would be grateful if anyone can come up and exchange emails with me regarding this project... i mean, the one, who can help me step by step..as how to start
i'll be using VB.NET and SQL Server...
thanks ..
All Praises are for the Lord of the universe...
Regards,
Tahir
|
|
|
|
|
This is the suggestions forum. My suggestion is to use the programming forums.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote:
This is the suggestions forum. My suggestion is
Chris is suggesting somethin....
I was born intelligent Education ruined me!.
|
|
|
|
|
Would it be possible to add a few fields by which search results could be sorted, such as popularity (since it takes into account the score and number of votes), date, etc.? (that's all I have in mind, perhaps some others have a few more fields by which to sort).
Wading through good and bad articles is never fun, and most often I use these to post links in the development forum to give users a list of articles about a particular topic. It would be nice to have the better articles listed first.
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.21
GCS/G/MU d- s: a- C++++ UL@ P++(+++) L+(--) E--- W+++ N++ o+ K? w++++ O- M(+) V? PS-- PE Y++ PGP++ t++@ 5 X+++ R+@ tv+ b(-)>b++ DI++++ D+ G e++>+++ h---* r+++ y+++
-----END GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
|
|
|
|
|
On the TODO list
cheers,
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote:
TODO list
Can we have a look into the 'TODO' list.. so that we can get an idea of what not to be repeated on the page....
Also, we can get an idea of, what all can be done at a discussion forum / portal kind of site... if at all we want to design our own site
I was born intelligent Education ruined me!.
|
|
|
|
|
It's 11 pages long. And no, I'm not joking.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I was born intelligent Education ruined me!.
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote:
It's 11 pages long.
Is that all. Looks like we'll have to start thinking of some more things we'd like to see changed
Michael
But you know when the truth is told,
That you can get what you want or you can just get old,
Your're going to kick off before you even get halfway through.
When will you realise... Vienna waits for you? - "The Stranger," Billy Joel
|
|
|
|
|
11 pages long is ok, how many 'TODO's per page???
I was born intelligent Education ruined me!.
|
|
|
|
|
Suggestion:
To fix the "licence issue" for new articles
In the submission wizard, ask clearly for a licencing statement.
Mark articles that were submitted including this information clearly (or, vice versa, distinctively mark articles lacking this information)
Or, even better provide a selection in the article wizard (and request similar information for submitted articles)
e.g.
( ) "CP Beer license" (Free, Copyrighted, view licence)
( ) "CP Afterwork license" (Free for noncommercial use, Copyrighted, view license)
( ) GPL (click to see license)
( ) Other - specify here [............................]
[ ] I understand all legal consequences of my selection above and yadda yadda yadda
for "Custom" provide a "custom license" field e.g. to enter a link to the license.
I don't know, however, if this is feasible legally, or would require to hire a horde of lawyers.
Flirt harder, I'm a coder.
mlog || Agile Programming | doxygen
|
|
|
|
|
werkin' on it
cheers,
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Article search only displays one page of results, "Next" (Page) is not clickable.
This happens even with very common terms like "MFC".
Flirt harder, I'm a coder.
mlog || Agile Programming | doxygen
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed
cheers,
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
peterchen wrote:
20 Jan '04 - Problem
Chris Maunder wrote:
21 Jan '04 - Fixed
That's what makes CP great. Thank you.
Flirt harder, I'm a coder.
mlog || Agile Programming | doxygen
|
|
|
|