|
Not only .webp files have a much better quality/size ratio, but they put to shame all those JPEGs, GIFs, and PNGs a long time ago, and .webp is de-facto Web standard.
In addition to that, they support animation, and I have good plans for that.
I remember that SVG raised the safety problem, but this problem is quite solvable.
So, what's the current status?
Thank you.
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
I've tried to change tags for my article, Reverse-engineering Linear PRNG with Exploratory Seeding[^].
Initially they were: C++, Dev, Intermediate, random and I've added one more, RNG. After submitting the updated version for review, I've noticed that some other tag, Objective-C, has also been added. So I reopened the article editor and removed that tag simply by wiping it from the text box. After submitting this updated version, I've noticed that removed tag remained unchanged.
Note that in this later update nothing has been changed except this tag.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi guys if you look at My post you will see my signature has some extra text at the beginning - it's only on that particular post
In a closed society where everybody's guilty, the only crime is getting caught. In a world of thieves, the only final sin is stupidity. - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
|
Usually the only reason an old question jumps back to the top of the "active" list is if a spammer or code-dumper has posted something that isn't a solution as a new solution.
But for the past few days, the active list has been filled with old questions, because a CodeProject editor has been making fairly minor edits to them.
That's making it harder to see what questions are truly "active", and which ones are being targeted by spammers.
Is there any way to make these minor edits not drag the question back to the top of the list? If not, I think it's probably not worth editing questions that are more than a couple of weeks old unless there's a major problem with them.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
I agree, and having looked at some of the edits I cannot see any good reason for why they have been done. Minor spelling or grammatical errors that do not detract from the clarity of the question really do not need changing.
[Edit]
An example of changes that are hardly necessary:
Quote: so can any one have the plugins/source code/ideas kindly share to me. That will helpful to me. Thanks in Advance.
Changed to:
Quote: Can any one who has the plugins/source code/ideas kindly share them to me. That will be helpful to me. Thanks in advance!
[/Edit]
modified 5 days ago.
|
|
|
|
|
On top of that, if the questions were old enough to be away of the 1st results page and not in the "unanswered" list... then looks a bit weird
Maybe some words with the editor?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
It would also help if a "solution" going to moderation didn't bring it to the top of the stack until it was approved - if it's rejected then the question hasn't changed and it shouldn't be advanced.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Reverse-engineering Linear PRNG with Exploratory Seeding
The formatting of the article looks ok to me. I am not a subject matter expert to verify its correctness. I wanted to read it but I hesitate because of its downvotes. Shouldn't CodeProject enforce downvoter to state the reason (so that potential readers be warned) or post constructive criticism for article improvement?
|
|
|
|
|
This crops up from time to time. It was tried, and it failed.
Starting today we're removing a barrier on down-voting. You are no longer forced to provide a comment when down-voting.
Basically, if you force users to provide a reason for a down-vote, then they won't down-vote anything for fear of "revenge votes" from the author and his friends. So we ended up with exceptionally poor articles being ranked very highly, not because they were any good, but because the author had a lot of friends (or possibly sock-puppet accounts).
There are mechanisms in place to counter stray down-votes. And if you think you've found a case of someone abusing the system, you can always ask the hamsters to investigate.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
1
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Additionally to what Richard said, we had a lot of "mega usefull" messages providing "reasons" for the one-vote as the one I just posted before this
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
The likely reason for the 1-votes are the maths: a lot of "casual readers" will look at that and just downvote because they want to just copy'n'paste and go. Maths scares them because it implies they have to think, and a large chunk of readership just doesn't want to do that.
If the subject interests you, read it - and make up your own mind. Then you can vote appropriately!
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you all, the participants of this thread, very much!
This discussion inspires me to continue my writing experience.
|
|
|
|
|
As I'm writing articles, I have a number of JSON entries. Unfortunately, the languages list has Java and JavaScript present, but no JSON. By the way, between Java and JavaScript, we have Kotlin so it's alphabetically out of sequence.
|
|
|
|
|
I was trying to vote an article but it prevents me not to do. I haven't got any emails(even on junks folder) regarding my registration confirmation. Any reason ?
|
|
|
|
|
Your account appears to be in good standing. I've tried sending you a confirmation request. Please let me know if you receive it.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|

here you can see on my website [^] there are multiple 404 error pages are being created automatically. I don't know how to remove them or solve this problem. I am using Wordpress cms. Please suggest some ideas.
|
|
|
|
|
Your question is in the wrong place, this forum is for issues with the CodeProject website. Please post in Ask a Question[^]. But you will need to provide a lot more information; as it stands no one can guess what your code is doing wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The "comments" counter in the "Who's who" list shows almost always "0", although it is not "0".
Example (left is screenshot of who's who, right is the direct profile):
 
only Exception in the first two pages: (again is left from Who's who and right from profile)
 
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
A spammer/troll posted a message which could not be formatted well in the Lounge
The Lounge[^]
Due to this the buttons open in new tab, bookmark and report buttons are pushed to the far right.

Maybe worth reporting.
|
|
|
|
|
I though it was me last week so I gave it some time. Et voila, today, still un-aerodynamic as all getout.
|
|
|
|
|
What were you searching for? Different types of content get rendered differently.
"Mistakes are prevented by Experience. Experience is gained by making mistakes."
|
|
|
|
|
Search[^]
As an example. The first couple are valid. But then going back ... not so much.
|
|
|
|