|
I noticed twice that a thread has irrelevant answers listed under it and the title is different. In both cases it happened when the post it was answering to has been deleted due to abuse/trolling.
* Exhibit A[^]
* Exhibit B[^]
GCS/GE d--(d) s-/+ a C+++ U+++ P-- L+@ E-- W+++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
The shortest horror story: On Error Resume Next
|
|
|
|
|
I reported a post as 'inappropriate' which was actually Exhibit A here. It's an orphan post linked into the wrong thread.
"They have a consciousness, they have a life, they have a soul! Damn you! Let the rabbits wear glasses! Save our brothers! Can I get an amen?"
|
|
|
|
|
Known issue reported a couple of times. I suppose it is down in the ToDo list
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Python Discussion Boards[^]
This is starboard view and under my green umbrella is one of the peculiarities. No tooltips; and incidently, if I mouseover the arrow here I get a webpage address (in Edge).
I like bugs though ...
[EDIT]
Alas, gone are the days of reacting to posts, P-L-A-C-E-B-O ...
[END EDIT]
modified 23-Feb-24 15:24pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well at least the bookmark flap and the report dropdown is back so let's call today's resonant vibration a win for the home team.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not sure what you mean... For me all download links work.
Also scanned them with Cortex XDR and all looks good.
modified 20-Feb-24 16:43pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry, I mean not the download links, but the download graph in the statistics page.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I am new to the forum and the answer response form (which is heavily code orientated... fine).
What I see as the suggested PREVIEW - does not seem to end up as the resulting output once submitted?
Not sure of the purpose then of having a PREVIEW section, which is deceiving and a waste of time trying to format correctly before submitting?
|
|
|
|
|
I (like most people here) have been using these forums for just over 20 years, and the preview display generally works correctly, and shows what will be the final post. You need to provide some more actual details as to what you saw at each stage.
|
|
|
|
|
On multiple attempts of submitting, it seemed to alter slightly to greatly (slightly = some changes, layout different.... Greatly = where it reformatted the text into a compacted html tagged type output of a different look completely).
The 2nd image showing the submitted answer (just now) is what I would suggest is a "slightly altered" view.
----------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry, but I cannot see any differences between the preview and the final response.
|
|
|
|
|
No problems then. Just assumed the different layout, highlighting and font colours meant it wasn't working correctly? I will navigate through the process and learn the changes it can generate. As said, when it posted the greatly altered version with html tags and removed lines, that weren't shown in the preview, that's the main one that indicated to me it was broken. I'll work it out.
|
|
|
|
|
A couple of obvious differences:
- Missing
<input> and <span> in the preview; - Your numbered list has been converted into a proper
<ol> , losing the line breaks between items; - Subtly different colouring for
<code> / `code` elements;
I suspect it's because you're using Markdown for your formatting, which has never worked brilliantly. The message preview probably doesn't support the full set of formatting applied to the final post.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the analysis... I guess that's where I started and mentioned I thought it wasn't ending up the same as preview. Didn't know about markdown issues or how it works, just that it seemed odd when pasting in information. I will watch out for markdown codes from now on.
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Mistakes are prevented by Experience. Experience is gained by making mistakes."
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for your help. That's where I have seen that in the past too.
Oh, wow, I wish I had a snapshot of what I was seeing because I wasn't seeing that link.
Hmm...Let me look at the article again.
Oh...check out this snapshot[^] - it doesn't show up there.
Question: Can you guess why?
Answer: Yep. When you narrow the browser window down, those options disappear and don't show up anywhere else that I can tell.
|
|
|
|
|
You have to shrink it to 1023px wide or less:
@media (min-width: 800px) and (max-width: 1023px) {
.article-container-parts .article-left-sidebar {
display: none;
}
}
@media (min-width: 757px) and (max-width: 800px) {
.article-container-parts .article-left-sidebar {
display: none;
}
}
@media (max-width: 756px) {
.article-container-parts .article-left-sidebar {
display: none;
}
}
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Codeproject Admin,
I submitted an article (twice) and they showed 'not found'. I think it's caused by your 'approval' software. Can you recover the article?
[Article:5351556]
- CodeProject[^]
Thanks,
Peter
|
|
|
|
|
Please do not repost the message in different fori... CP stuff check both the places where you posted.
I answered you in the "Article" board, check it
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|