15,902,938 members
Sign in
Sign in
Email
Password
Forgot your password?
Sign in with
home
articles
Browse Topics
>
Latest Articles
Top Articles
Posting/Update Guidelines
Article Help Forum
Submit an article or tip
Import GitHub Project
Import your Blog
quick answers
Q&A
Ask a Question
View Unanswered Questions
View All Questions
View C# questions
View C++ questions
View Javascript questions
View Visual Basic questions
View Python questions
discussions
forums
CodeProject.AI Server
All Message Boards...
Application Lifecycle
>
Running a Business
Sales / Marketing
Collaboration / Beta Testing
Work Issues
Design and Architecture
Artificial Intelligence
ASP.NET
JavaScript
Internet of Things
C / C++ / MFC
>
ATL / WTL / STL
Managed C++/CLI
C#
Free Tools
Objective-C and Swift
Database
Hardware & Devices
>
System Admin
Hosting and Servers
Java
Linux Programming
Python
.NET (Core and Framework)
Android
iOS
Mobile
WPF
Visual Basic
Web Development
Site Bugs / Suggestions
Spam and Abuse Watch
features
features
Competitions
News
The Insider Newsletter
The Daily Build Newsletter
Newsletter archive
Surveys
CodeProject Stuff
community
lounge
Who's Who
Most Valuable Professionals
The Lounge
The CodeProject Blog
Where I Am: Member Photos
The Insider News
The Weird & The Wonderful
help
?
What is 'CodeProject'?
General FAQ
Ask a Question
Bugs and Suggestions
Article Help Forum
About Us
Search within:
Articles
Quick Answers
Messages
Comments by Robin Cheng (HPMV) (Top 2 by date)
Robin Cheng (HPMV)
15-Aug-11 13:49pm
View
Oh and I guess it's also useful for arrays declared without explicit bound with an array literal, like in te original question :)
Robin Cheng (HPMV)
15-Aug-11 13:47pm
View
Ah I see; didn't know that before :)
I say it's a bad style because if we have C++ we have a greater flexibility of doing things. If we need a fixed sized array and want to vary the size at compile time, we could use a const int to specify the size which can later be accessed. If we need a variable sized array we could use classes like std::vector.
Personally I would suggest this only if it's out of pure convenience and used for a local array. Because this is a compile time computation and only works if the length of arr is known at compile time. This means if an array is passed to a function, the function would not know this and the aforementioned expression would not work.