Comments by Member 1880403

Member 1880403 14-Dec-15 7:43am View

Reason for my vote of 1 \n No. There are so many ways to achieve the same result without exposing the full textbox.

Member 1880403 20-Apr-15 7:34am View

Reason for my vote of 4 \n Good work. No criticism, but just an observation based on my experience. Sometimes the schema info returned by GetSchema is not a true representation of the schema, as datatypes are often translated etc. Also anything other than MS SQL is terribly generic, if it comes back at all. To this end, if I need to programmatically get schema info, I usually do it with queries in the native SQL of the underlying database. However, sometimes that's more than you need, in which case GetSchema �s often all you need:)

Member 1880403 9-Mar-15 10:24am View

Reason for my vote of 4 \n Cool, but you may find it doesn't always work. I've discovered in the past that whether or not onunload ever fires is dependent on the browser and its security settings.

Member 1880403 10-Oct-14 7:57am View

Reason for my vote of 5 \n Don't let the naysayers put you off.

Member 1880403 27-Aug-14 7:24am View

Reason for my vote of 2 \n Too basic to be a tip/trick, but good effort.

Member 1880403 9-Dec-13 8:56am View

Sorry, but BillWoodruff is correct. By default, controls added at run time in this way are invisible. The simple one line addition needed to make your example work is to set Visible = true;

Member 1880403 4-Jun-13 4:09am View

Well I did. And anyone else who googles for a good MSDN style document generator for VS will I guess. Anyway, sorry for clearly offending you. I appreciate that you attempted to answer the question. Please don't let me put you off. Right now, I must crack on with my work. All the best.

Member 1880403 4-Jun-13 4:04am View

Seeing as you insist, I was attempting to stop lots of people wasting their time and building up their hopes thinking a solution had been found, when in fact it is a solution to an entirely different problem, and a minute of reading would have made that obvious.

Member 1880403 4-Jun-13 3:56am View

No useful info at all, which I why I didn't post. Lets not further dilute this thread by bickering. There is work to be done.

Member 1880403 3-Jun-13 10:02am View

It would have taken less than a minute more to work out that posting a link about XML documentation in code is not the same as producing MSDN style documentation that the original poster and others were asking about.

Comments by Member 1880403 (Top 10 by date)