15,992,250 members
Sign in
Sign in
Email
Password
Forgot your password?
Sign in with
home
articles
Browse Topics
>
Latest Articles
Top Articles
Posting/Update Guidelines
Article Help Forum
Submit an article or tip
Import GitHub Project
Import your Blog
quick answers
Q&A
Ask a Question
View Unanswered Questions
View All Questions
View C# questions
View C++ questions
View Javascript questions
View Visual Basic questions
View .NET questions
discussions
forums
CodeProject.AI Server
All Message Boards...
Application Lifecycle
>
Running a Business
Sales / Marketing
Collaboration / Beta Testing
Work Issues
Design and Architecture
Artificial Intelligence
ASP.NET
JavaScript
Internet of Things
C / C++ / MFC
>
ATL / WTL / STL
Managed C++/CLI
C#
Free Tools
Objective-C and Swift
Database
Hardware & Devices
>
System Admin
Hosting and Servers
Java
Linux Programming
Python
.NET (Core and Framework)
Android
iOS
Mobile
WPF
Visual Basic
Web Development
Site Bugs / Suggestions
Spam and Abuse Watch
features
features
Competitions
News
The Insider Newsletter
The Daily Build Newsletter
Newsletter archive
Surveys
CodeProject Stuff
community
lounge
Who's Who
Most Valuable Professionals
The Lounge
The CodeProject Blog
Where I Am: Member Photos
The Insider News
The Weird & The Wonderful
help
?
What is 'CodeProject'?
General FAQ
Ask a Question
Bugs and Suggestions
Article Help Forum
About Us
Search within:
Articles
Quick Answers
Messages
Comments by Palavos (Top 2 by date)
Palavos
23-Sep-12 20:05pm
View
But I did. Take a look at the Solution I found and posted below.
Palavos
23-Sep-12 4:48am
View
But I do not want to do anything fancy here. There is only one thread that has to run and that is the computer thinking thread. I just want to update a textBox showing the words "Thinking..." before the computer starts thinking (or after the human player has played, I just want to update an image with the piece the human player moved, before calling the ComputerMove).
I have read articles stating that DoEvents is a bad idea, but they refer to having many chuncks of code doing things that could interfere. Not to having to update a textBox or an image just before you call one (just one) function. Surely I do not have to start a whole new thread just to update a textBox, do I? :)
I just hoped a presentation-oriented technology like Metro would have some inherent mechanisms to cover that simple case.
I did study some more and found out that you are right in the threading part: from the advent of Silverlight and WPF asynchronous calling of threads is the way to go for updating the UI.
Will try this way and tell you what happened.