|
That's not even just AI but the idiocy of people implicitly "trusting the computer". If you know you have money but the bank says "nuh-uh the computer says you have none", you'd demand some sort of ledger accounting/review.
Too much already is just so ridiculous and with zero requirement that machine output be explicitly subject to scrutiny.
|
|
|
|
|
For example GDPR (as linked in the question) is a good idea - it forces developers (via the companies they work for) to adopt sensible practices around the handling of sensitive personal information, and provides a "big stick" with which to threaten or beat those who erroneously assume they know what they doing.
That doesn't mean it's good legislation, just that it's well intentioned legislation which is about all you can expect for a monolithic bureaucracy that doesn't understand technology. So what you get is monolithic legislation that makes life difficult because only the bureaucrats that wrote it understand it ...
I think you need to define what problems or potential problems AI legislation is intended to prevent before you can even consider legislating around how we handle it.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
modified 10-Oct-22 1:42am.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
