Quote:
I want to filter the record ... without primary key or without using any column name.
You do realize that that request is just nonsense, don't you?
You have a set of values in a table that you which to filter down to: in your case "Record_1" to "Record_100" which means that you have to discard all rows which contain data not in that change.
But all data in a table is stored in columns (regardless of any primary key or indeed any other indexing you may have applied).
So you cannot logically do any filtering unless you access the column based data - which means naming the columns that contain the data that differentiates the rows.
What you are asking for is "I want a list of all red cars in the car park, but you must do it blindfolded".
I think you need to go back to your intention and rethink it somewhat - at the moment teh request makes no sense whatsoever.
And while you are at it ... If "Record_n" is a set of values in your DB, then your design is flawed and will give you difficulty. When numbers are stored as part of strings, all comparisons are string based: which means the first different character pair determines the result of the whole comparison. So the order to string based numbers is not 1, 2, 3 ... it's 1, 10, 100, 101, ...109, 11, 110, ...
Don't store numbers as part of strings if you ever want to access and use them as numeric values: it's a PITA.