|
Edited: The post is removed because it is an April Fool post and AF day is over.
modified 7-Apr-24 1:20am.
|
|
|
|
|
|
It's like that was ripped directly from my mind
Check out my IoT graphics library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx
And my IoT UI/User Experience library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/uix
|
|
|
|
|
Modular Inc. today open-sourced the core components of Mojo, a programming language designed for writing artificial intelligence software. In case you want to give your code some mojo
|
|
|
|
|
I've Lost My Mojo! - YouTube[^]
I'll get my coat
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
First, they build programs with open source. Then they build their business with open source. Then they abandon it and cash out. Money makes the source go closed
|
|
|
|
|
Article wrote: Then they abandon it and cash out.
Then lawyers appear in the scene and everything gets even more messed
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Last line of article is part of a Stallman quote:
Stallman: ...extracting money from users of a program by restricting their use of it is destructive.
Either I don't fully understand that quote, or it is completely ridiculous.
1) It is a known fact that if you provide your software for free then like 15% of people pay some amount for it (85% or more never pay for it). A developer cannot support herself from the donations even on very popular projects.
2) Also, "restricting their use of it" is actually the definition of every product where anyone gets paid.
For example:
a) Teslas are not free. You are restricted from their use, until you pay for one.
b) Plumbing services are not free. You are restricted from their use, until you pay (or agree to pay) the plumber.
c) Internet service is not free. You are restricted from its use until you pay for it.
d) Software development is not free. You are restricted from having software developed until you pay the software developer.
e) ad infinitum...
3) if something is not of restricted use, then people (consumers) use it freely and no one is paid for the thing, service, etc.
The article also mentions that you can continue to use older versions of the software which fell under the original open source license -- before the company or individual placed it under a new restrictive license.
Also, it is quite likely that the current feeling that software is valueless has been caused by software developers giving everything away.
In summary, I have no idea what that article is talking about.
But, I'm sure someone will explain it to me. 
|
|
|
|
|
And Stallman himself requires payment for him to give a talk somewhere, thus 'extracting money by restricting his use' 
Where I have problems with the way some open source companies are going. They have their software open sourced initially, then once it's become popular (and the bugs get ironed out by the 'many eyes'), they switch to a closed source model. Or at least a supported fork of it is closed source. RedHat, Redis, MySQL, MongoDB, Elastic, etc., etc.
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
raddevus wrote: Also, it is quite likely that the current feeling that software is valueless has been caused by software developers giving everything away.
That's 100% AAPL's doing and why I think you should most definitely give them the finger and forget they exist if you are a software developer.
|
|
|
|
|
In software development, ensuring uniform coding styles across different editors and IDEs is challenging. Central command has defined indentation to be pi spaces
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: Central command has defined indentation to be pi spaces
That's going to be funny in python...
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: In Visual Studio you can create a new .editorconfig file this way:
Unless you happen to be running Visual Studio 2022 (prior to v17.9.x), where this option simply does nothing:
Unable to add editorconfig file in VS2022 - Developer Community[^]
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Sketching complex art imagery may be AI's specialty, yet some of the simplest tasks are evidently what AI struggles with the most. A polar bear eating marshmallows during a blizzard?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Red Hat warned users to immediately stop using systems running Fedora development and experimental versions because of a backdoor found in the latest XZ Utils data compression tools and libraries. Were all those eyes looking for bugs in alphabetical order?
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: Were all those eyes looking for bugs in alphabetical order?
I think they were bussier looking for things in Windows to say "look, this is creap and my way is better"
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Microsoft is restoring drag-and-drop functionality to File Explorer’s address bar after removing the feature in Windows 11 23H2 (Moment 4). By 'finally', they mean, 'bringing it back'
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: By 'finally', they mean, 'bringing it back'
As long as it is not "breaking it again"... 
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Microsoft's claim of not many people using drag and drop needs to be backed by actual telemetry numbers. My suspicion is that not many Microsoft developers use it.
|
|
|
|
|
Use of "Lenna" image in computer image processing research stretches back to the 1970s. They're tired of their kid brother stealing their copy of Transactions on Antennas and Propagation
Not to mention the pages stuck together[1].
[1] He likes to eat baklava and caramel corn while reading them
Sorry to those offended by the barest mention of that publication[2].
[2] IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, of course. Fans of Microwave and Optical Technology Letters will no doubt be offended.
|
|
|
|
|
When I was a kid my older cousins were talking about Playboy and similar as "magazines that you read with only one hand"
Me (somewhen between 5 and 7 years old): And with the other hand... you change the page?  
How easy and nice was the world back then... 
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Echoing the past two years of Rust evangelism and C/C++ ennui, Google reports that Rust shines in production, to the point that its developers are twice as productive using the language compared to C++. Is faster better?
I guess for management it is
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: Is faster better?I guess for management it is
I thought for management was cheaper better
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Called Voice Generation, the model has been in development since late 2022 and powers the Read Aloud feature in ChatGPT. They're waiting for someone to think of a non-malicious use of it before they release it
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
