|
Kent Sharkey wrote: Coming soon - new C naming guidelines that prohibit you from using the letter C in any variable name
That would be a unt move.
GCS/GE d--(d) s-/+ a C+++ U+++ P-- L+@ E-- W+++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: Clause 4.3.1 states that “Using the Marks in the name of a tool for use in the Rust toolchain, a software program written in the Rust language, or a software program compatible with Rust software, will most likely require a license. The “RS” abbreviation can be used instead.”
Is RS an acronym for Really Stupid, or homophone for arse.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
|
|
|
|
|
Dan Neely wrote: Is RS an acronym for Really Stupid, or homophone for arse.
Yes.
GCS/GE d--(d) s-/+ a C+++ U+++ P-- L+@ E-- W+++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
Using Quatum theory, it could be both  
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
By Norwegian law, a trademark cannot be a simple, well known noun. It must have something 'new' to it - like another patent, it should not be well known at the time you ask for protection. 'Rust' has been known for millenia, and would not, by itself, be accepted as a protected trade mark in Norway (the word is the same in Norwegian).
I was convinced that the laws were similar in the US of A. Many years ago, Intel managed to make '486' a concept almost as well defined as 'Scotch' and 'Thermos', but competitors also benefited from the (non-protected) '486' mark. So for the next development, Intel tried to seek trademark protection for '586'. It was denied, Intel appealed to the court, and the judge turned them down, stating that 'the number 586 has been in use for a long time in several different application areas'. (I wish I had saved the exact wording, this is from memory.)
If you can not have '586' as a legally protected trade mark, I am surprised if you can have 'Rust' protected.
|
|
|
|
|
In Italy it works also in reverse, if a commercial name becomes so commonly linked to a certain product category, it becomes free to use (after a while).
Sottilette is the italian brand name for Kraft's cheese slices, and since for a long while they were virtually the only cheese slices commercialized in Italy it became a common name. When Kraft sued some companies for selling their own slices calling them sottilette it's been ruled that it can no longer be considered a trademarked name due to the widespread correlation between their name and the generic product. Indeed now their product line is called Sottilette LE Originali (literally "The Original Sottilette").
GCS/GE d--(d) s-/+ a C+++ U+++ P-- L+@ E-- W+++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
den2k88 wrote: In Italy it works also in reverse, if a commercial name becomes so commonly linked to a certain product category, it becomes free to use (after a while).
I discovered that this is in accordance with
DIRECTIVE (EU) 2015/2436 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks[^], Article 20:
A trade mark shall be liable to revocation if, after the date on which it was registered:
(a) as a result of acts or inactivity of the proprietor, it has become the common name in the trade for a product or service in respect of which it is registered;
[...]
Here in Norway, lots of people refuse to believe that 'primus' (portable kerosene stove), 'thermos', 'unbraco' and several other common nouns have a trade mark origin. I guess this goes in other countries as well, like 'Scotch' and 'Kool-Aid' and probably a lot of others in the US of A.
|
|
|
|
|
Is the Italian version legally cheese at all? Kraft Singles (the think plastic wrapped yellow-orange squares whose sole virtue is melting nicely on burgers) in the US have so many additives and fillers that Kraft is not legally allowed to call it cheese.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
|
|
|
|
|
In Norway, this surimi based product cannot be sold as 'krabbepinner' (a direct translation of 'crab sticks'), as it is not made from crab at all. So it is sold as 'crab sticks', using the English term.
A number of years ago, Dahls Brewery of Trondheim, Norway, was making Norway's very best lemon soft drink, marketing it as 'Real Lemon Soda'. The authorities went after them, ordered them to stop the selling of it, using false advertising. Dahls protested: The regulations say that you can uses terms like 'Lemon' (or orange, apple or whatever is relevant) if the natural juice content is at least 8%. Their 'Lemmy' had 12% natural lemon juice! Yet, they were not allowed to sell Lemmy while the case was processed by the courts. The courts decided that Dahls was allowed to sell Lemmy as 'Lemon Soda', but not as real Lemon Soda  . It took the courts a year to reach this conclusion. In the meantime, competing lemon sodas had taken over the market. For a period, Dahls tried to market Lemmy as 'Lemon Soda' (but not 'real'!), but never managed to recoup any significant market share. After a couple of years, Lemmy was discontinued. I still miss it.
Some times, law makers / authorities behave in ways that, if duplicated by an individual would cause that individual to be taken care of by personnel in light green coats in subdued light.
|
|
|
|
|
LinkedIn’s new verification system supports CLEAR, Microsoft Entra, and work email verification for more than 4,000 companies. Something else to update when you're using LinkedIn to find a new job
|
|
|
|
|
I count me "lucky" that I never needed it to find a job.
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I found 2 out of 3 jobs only thanks to LinkedIn.
GCS/GE d--(d) s-/+ a C+++ U+++ P-- L+@ E-- W+++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
Glad to see that it was useful for you / is useful for people in the platform. 
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Reports say it's a commitment to AI, despite signing cautionary AI "pause" letter. Coming soon: Tweets from AI
They've got to be more sensible than most of the tweeters, no?
|
|
|
|
|
Was not there a crypto that used GPU instead of CPU + HDD / SSD?
Kent Sharkey wrote: They've got to be more sensible than most of the tweeters, no?
Even a rock would be it
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
"Should I buy Twitter for $44 billion?"
ChatGPT: ...Ultimately, the decision to buy Twitter should be based on a comprehensive evaluation of its financial performance, user base, competition, potential for growth, and price. It may be helpful to consult with financial and investment professionals to make an informed decision.
/s
|
|
|
|
|
Ethical hackers can earn up to $20,000 for their bug-finding efforts. Here's everything you need to know about the new Bug Bounty Program. Can't they just ask ChatGPT?
|
|
|
|
|
or Bard (if it is not cancelled yet)?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Have you ever wanted the ability to secure the local administrator accounts on your deployed Windows devices? Have you ever needed to recover a device and wished you could log in with a local administrator account? By popular demand: a feature I've never heard of or knew was needed
Can someone translate?
|
|
|
|
|
"Wolverine" experiment can fix Python bugs at runtime and re-run the code "I'm the best there is at what I do, but what I do isn't very nice"
Just post a script with a main, and keep calling it until the job is done.
|
|
|
|
|
AI progress report highlights increased sophistication, additional hiring, and some hallucinating. Of which about 3.5 will still be around in five years?
AI for ... is the new Uber for ...
|
|
|
|
|
Did they say how many of them are actually useful and accurated?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
No, but I. Sticking with my 3.5 estimate
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
These days, top-down modular programming is pushed aside by object-oriented programming when it comes to teaching how to program. But there is a place for both methodologies to co-exist and top-down programming solves the ever-present problem of how to begin. "You got the top pulled down and the radio on, baby"
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: In fact, [using inheritance in object-oriented programming] is so fragile that many programmers think that inheritance is a mistake and should be avoided if possible.
Those people are not programmers...
edit: Quote: However, you can already see that the object approach imposes a completely different subdivision on the problem. Object-oriented design isn't top-down, even when it pretends to be. The decomposition provided by objects is a model of the real world, which is after all where the idea originated - i.e. in the Simula language and the practice of creating simulations.
Not a convincing argument, and I'm not certain I'd buy his thinking. Object-oriented programming is 'composing objects to do the job,' and I'd consider that 'composition.'
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
