|
The test was part of a series of experiments to see if OpenAI's latest GPT model could perform "power-seeking" behavior. No cheating on the Turing Test!
|
|
|
|
|
The first step into the Matrix.
I’ve given up trying to be calm. However, I am open to feeling slightly less agitated.
I’m begging you for the benefit of everyone, don’t be STUPID.
|
|
|
|
|
This survey revealed that 51% of people reset their password at least once a month because they could not remember it, including 15% who did so weekly. I remember it started with a 'P'...
But what if you forget your face or finger?
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: This survey revealed that 51% of people reset their password at least once a month because they could not remember it, including 15% who did so weekly.
So, the dumbest people drive industry standards? That checks out. 
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: But what if you forget your face or finger?
Often, in the mornings (particularly weekend mornings), I see a completely unknown face in the mirror. What happens if the login mechanism insists that that strange fellow is the one allowed to log in, rather than me?
|
|
|
|
|
There are way too many passwords to remember...
|
|
|
|
|
Kaladin wrote: There are way too many passwords to remember...
that's why many people only use one 
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: But what if you forget your face or finger?
I wish the iPhone would go back to the finger. It's such a PITA to have to make direct eye contact every time you want to unlock your phone. Sure, better than typing in a password, but not exactly a step forward.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
If you are a game developer, a mobile developer, or are interested in learning new tricks to better debug your code, check out this latest release. I still think it needs a longer product name
Maybe work the build number, some random animal names, or the Lead PM's mother's birth date in there.
|
|
|
|
|
C++ developer Phil Nash contends Python is the best starter language, or a great second language for frontend and web developers. It's a BASIC choice
edit: yet another typo
modified 14-Mar-23 17:00pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: But what’s wrong with JavaScript as a first language? Well, JavaScript is a good choice, but it was never really designed as a beginner-friendly language,
FTFH (fixed that for him)
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Or he could have just left it at, "JavaScript was never really designed"
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Which "designed" languages ever made great success?
Pascal was designed as a language for teaching programming. It had a few good years, not that many, until language(s) with not very much of a design took over.
DoD had a language designed for military systems. Rumors say that for the first five years of Ada being the only accepted language for new defense software, every single project were granted an exemption from this requirement.
CHILL, maybe one of the best designed algorithmic language that I ever met, was in use for its intended target usage - embedded software in digital switching systems - for a few dominant systems, for a few years. It never was marketed as a general purpose language; there is no good reason why except that the developers and users didn't care to. It never became any success.
Now if you come and say "But K&R C was designed by K&R!" - then you could say that any language is "designed", including Javascript. There is of course a thick, fuzzy line between "designed" and "scrapped together", but honestly, I consider both Javascript and C (including its derivatives) to lie on the same side of that dividing line, without even touching its fuzzy edges.
|
|
|
|
|
I agree for the most part. Languages designed by committee for wide use rather than designed on-the-fly by a small team for their own use.
For the most part, only the first few languages (such as ALGOL, FORTRAN, COBOL, maybe BASIC, not so much Assembly) would have been created in a vacuum. All languages since then have learned from the strengths and weaknesses of earlier languages and evolved -- such as CPL > BCPL > B > C.
|
|
|
|
|
And leave the real programming to the experts.
|
|
|
|
|
C is the better choice to start with if you want to move to C++ eventually. If you want to be a frontend web developer then master JavaScript, TypeScript, Node and eventually a language that has a WASM compile target. Only a n00b who's lying about their experience would recommend Python for learning FE web work.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Also, even for backend work... everyone knows Python is slow. I would avoid it like the plague. If you want to get into AI or testing, that's a different story. But for web development, speed of execution still matters.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Any language where code formatting is significant is fundamentally flawed.
That's especially true for a "starter language".
"Fairy tales do not tell children the dragons exist. Children already know that dragons exist. Fairy tales tell children the dragons can be killed."
- G.K. Chesterton
|
|
|
|
|
Make no mistake about it, Ethernet in 2023 remains the foundation of all modern networking and is likely to remain so for the foreseeable future. But I have all this coax lying around
|
|
|
|
|
Ethernet runs over coax, just not as fast.
|
|
|
|
|
Details, details... 
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Ethernet over thinnet COAX is limited to 10 Mb/s. Ethernet over thicknet COAX is limited to 2 Mb/s.
I had the joy of designing networks using both.
|
|
|
|
|
The original ethernet was running on thicket, 3 Mbps (unless you insist on rounding down 2.94 to 2), but never commercialized. The first commercially successful ethernet were using thicknet on 10 Mbps (10BASE5). Thinnet, 10BASE2 came several years later.
|
|
|
|
|
What are all those tokens?
|
|
|
|
|
See, I’m not the only one who goes there. 
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
