|
Hi Dears
I've created an Exchange 2000 Store Event Sink in Visual C++ using
______________________________________________________
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;288156
------------------------------------------------------
I've also created a COM+ Event Sink Application usin
________________________________________________________
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/wss/wss/wsst_create_a_com_event_sink_application.asp
--------------------------------------------------------
Now I have to register my "Event Sink"
There is some guidance on thr URL
___________________________________________________
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/wss/wss/wsst_registering_an_event_sink.asp
---------------------------------------------------
But I think it's for Visual Basic not for Visual C++ implementation
Please help me...................
I'll be very grateful to you.
Kind Regards
Atif
Watch Your Thoughts for they will become your actions.
Watch Your Actions for they will become your habits.
Watch Your Habits for they will become your beliefs.
Watch Your Beliefs for they will determine your destiny.
|
|
|
|
|
// define interface
IEnumString* pEnumStr;
...
|
|
|
|
|
STL messages output by VC++ 6.0 compiler is something that should be shun at any cost. Is there a way someone can get something more sane from the compiler when it is outputting STL messages?
Is there a way to suppress STL warning messages?
Thanks.
William
Fortes in fide et opere!
|
|
|
|
|
One solution is to set the compiler error/warning level under configuration properties.
Kuphryn
|
|
|
|
|
There are a few things that you can try. If you build with your warning level at 3 which is the default setting you can get rid of most of the warnings by using:
#pragma warning(disable:4786)
which solves warning C4786 - 'identifier' : identifier was truncated to 'number' characters in the debug information. It's perfectly safe to do that, Microsoft say it's a limitation of the debugger rather than the compiler.
If you need to run at warning level 4, you can try the article STL without warnings[^]
If you're having trouble you can have a look at an STL Error Decryptor at STLFilt: An STL Error Message Decryptor for C++[^]
Most of the STL Error Decryptors are based on the material from the CUJ article by Leor Zolman, An STL Error Message Decryptor for Visual C++[^]
If you can keep you head when all about you
Are losing theirs and blaming it on you;
If you can dream - and not make dreams your master;
If you can think - and not make thoughts you aim;
Yours is the Earth and everything that's in it.
Rudyard Kipling
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I want to create an ATL componenet or
control that "catches" all windows messages for a specific hWnd and raises its
own event. Basically I want to be able to create an instance of the control,
pass to it an hWnd and whenever that hWnd receives a windows message I want it
to raise an event. The primary use will be to allow eVB users to subclass
controls.Pls help.Pls provide any sampls or links if possible.
Thnks in advance
Ram
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I have a class similar to the one below:
class CBook{
public:
char m_szAuthor[256];
char m_szBookname[256];
long m_nID;
};
I need to store a list of thousands of CBook objects. I need to do sorting on the list.
Assuming that I am going to use the std::list STL object, would it be better for me to create a list of objects or of pointers?
ie: list<cbook> or list<cbook*> ?
What are the advantages/disadvantages of each?
Thanks in advance,
Jeremy.
Jeremy Pullicino
C++ Developer
Homepage
|
|
|
|
|
It depends on how 'expensive' copying your objects is. If all you need to coppy is two pointers to strings (std::string or CString) and a long int, probably having a list < Book > is OK. But if you need to store a lot of data in your objects, copying around the elements gets expensive.
The downside for a list < Book* > is that you need to provide all kind of sorting functionality yourself (as you do not want to sort on your pointers numerical value, but on the property of the underlying object. You end up writing a lot of functors yourself.
Maybe you can write some sort of proxy-class, which contains a pointer to a Book-object with all the data, and provides the needed operators to get sorted automatically by the STL-build in routines. operator!=() and operator<() should be sufficient for sorting. Additionally you would probably need constructor/destructor, copy-constructor and assignment-operator, You would then have the best of both worlds: Transparent working with the proxy-objects and cheap copying.
Who is 'General Failure'? And why is he reading my harddisk?!?
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for your quick and comprehensive answer.
Are you aware of any such proxy-objects? Perhaps auto_ptr would do the trick?
Copying could be quite expensive since much more data could exist in the CBook class.
Jeremy Pullicino
C++ Developer
Homepage
|
|
|
|
|
Never ever put an auto_ptr in a standard container.
auto_ptr has a funny copy semantic, and you end up with your objects getting deleted while being copied.
You could use boosts[^]shared_ptr, which does reference counting and has a more intuitive copy semantic.
Or you can simply make your own class: Constructor that takes an Book-object, a few Get/Set functions for the underlying object, assignment-op and copy constructor that deletes its contained object and takes ownership of the new one and a set of operators that access the contained Book-object to determine the sorting sequence.
Who is 'General Failure'? And why is he reading my harddisk?!?
|
|
|
|
|
All of the sort algorithm's in STL have approximately O(N log N) complexity.
Maps on the other hand have an insertion complexity of O(N * log(size() + N)), so it may be quicker to add all of the books to a map, which is always sorted rather than having to do it explicitly. It may depend on the application.
SGI STL Complexity[^]
jhwurmbach correctly pointed out that using pointers will be cheaper, but missed that the sort algorithms can optionally take a predicate. In cases like this, you are almost always going to use a functor to sort your data based on your criteria.
jhwurmbach wrote
Maybe you can write some sort of proxy-class. ... Additionally you would probably need ...
This isn't really true, raw pointers are fine, you don't need anything extra in the container, the extra stuff will go into the sort criteria function object.
If you can keep you head when all about you
Are losing theirs and blaming it on you;
If you can dream - and not make dreams your master;
If you can think - and not make thoughts you aim;
Yours is the Earth and everything that's in it.
Rudyard Kipling
|
|
|
|
|
Hello,
I would like to insert an element into a list container during iteration.
How would I do that? Please refer my comment in the code.
<br />
list<long> myList;<br />
myList.push_back(2);<br />
myList.push_back(4);<br />
myList.push_back(6);<br />
myList.push_back(8);<br />
myList.push_back(10);<br />
myList.push_back(12);<br />
myList.push_back(14);<br />
<br />
list<long>::iterator lItemItr;<br />
for(lItemItr= myList.begin(); lItemItr!= myList.end(); lItemItr++)<br />
{<br />
if(*lItemItr == 8)<br />
myList.insert( lItemItr + 1, *lItemItr);
}
How would I do that?
thank you
Sonork 100.41263:Anthony_Yio
|
|
|
|
|
If you want to insert after the 10, you need to compare with 10, not withsome other number!?!
Also, MSDN states about std::list::insert: "Each of the member functions inserts, before the element pointed to by it in the controlled sequence, a sequence specified by the remaining operands. The first member function inserts a single element with value x and returns an iterator that points to the newly inserted element."
SO, this lines should work:
if (*lItemIter == 10)
{
lItemIter++;
list<long>::iterator newElem = myList.insert (lItemIter, 8);
}
Who is 'General Failure'? And why is he reading my harddisk?!?
|
|
|
|
|
Probably I would play around with the return "newElem" to do some trick here.
thanks
Sonork 100.41263:Anthony_Yio
|
|
|
|
|
<br />
list<<long>>::iterator lItemItr;<br />
for(lItemItr= myList.begin(); lItemItr!= myList.end(); lItemItr++)<br />
{<br />
if(*lItemItr == 10) myList.insert( lItemItr , 8);<br />
}
Jeremy Pullicino
C++ Developer
Homepage
|
|
|
|
|
Of course, I could just do it this way but this codes is just to demonstrate my another problem. It is not my actual problem. My actual problem is way too long to be explained here.
In short. I do not want to insert in this direct way.
if(*lItemItr == 10) myList.insert( lItemItr , 8);
I want to insert during if(*lItemItr == 8)
Any idea?
thank you
Sonork 100.41263:Anthony_Yio
|
|
|
|
|
Anthony_Yio wrote:
I want to insert during if(*lItemItr == 8)
Any idea?
No.
Insert during a comparsion? How could that work?
Do you mean you want to assign to some iterator?
I am sorry, but as long as your actual problem is way too long to be explained, you will get only solutions that are way too short to be helpful.
Who is 'General Failure'? And why is he reading my harddisk?!?
|
|
|
|
|
Not during comparison.
Anyway,
it is okay. I will work it out.
Thanks.
Sonork 100.41263:Anthony_Yio
|
|
|
|
|
I think I should stick to vector.
vector allows iterator + 1;
Sonork 100.41263:Anthony_Yio
|
|
|
|
|
Anthony_Yio wrote:
I think I should stick to vector.
Depends on what you want:
Insertion into the middle of a vector is extremely expensive, as the vector is guarateed to occupy continous memory, and needs to copy anything after the insertion point.
Good is that you can do iterator arithmetics like it+6
List handles insertion in the middle better, but you cant do iterator arithmetics.
You can only increment iterators, i.e. move to the next element.
Who is 'General Failure'? And why is he reading my harddisk?!?
|
|
|
|
|
thank you for the information.
Regards,
Anthony Yio
Sonork 100.41263:Anthony_Yio
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I have a VC++(console)/ATL Script host app in which i create COM objects(say for Buttons) dynamically .I like to handle events for these Objects.Will it be possible for to handle events using IConnectionPoint/Sinks ?. Or this is possible only for in case of MFC app.Pls help me.Should i need to migrate from Console to MFC?
Thnks
Ram
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, it is possible to handle COM events in win32 console applications using ATL or raw C++.
Kuphryn
|
|
|
|
|
Can you pls brief me on this.And give me any samples or links related to this if possible.I am strugling with this for a while.When there are more than one button in aconsole how to know which button was clicked.Pls help.I will be really grateful.
Thnks in advance
ram
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
