|
|
I think the authors should update their code from time to time.
- Michael Haephrati מיכאל האפרתי
|
|
|
|
|
That is entirely up to the authors. In some cases, we have authors who still use the old version of the IDE they created the code in so they won't be in a position to update it. In other cases, it takes far more effort than they have time available to them. There are so many reasons that people don't update the code.
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
Unlike the new Article post, in Revision phase, the new Technical blog post do not allow other user/approval to communicate with the author on how to improve the post. The comment section was disabled "Comments are only available once an article is submitted for publishing."
I think that option should be open up so that the community can chip in their comments/concerns before the blog when live. That case, some readers, do not have to release their aggression through downvoting the blog post to 1 anonymously.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Most of his rep points come from the Organiser[^] and Participant[^] categories. Neither of which are linked to posting content.
Maybe he's signed in/out a lot, and voted, reported and bookmarked lots of other people's posts. 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Have a look at the chart, over 4K rise in participant category on 13th of December 2013...
Been a busy day 
|
|
|
|
|
Well, the Participant points are kinda hard to come by. There might be less than 30 members with more Participant points than him and most of them have multiple MVP awards.
Here is another one that seemed to gain a lot of Participant points around the same time:
Member 10418540 - Professional Profile[^]
BTW, that profile must be messed up. It shows up on page 14 of Who's Who at CodeProject[^] and is almost 50K total points short of that ranking
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
It's not a well known fact, but CP will sell you rep points if you ask politely and provide your credit card #. 
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
|
although I don't care that much about the points, I do find such report useful because
1) it might be a bug in the site
2) it might be an exploit being abused
3) either way, if the guy is doing "obscured" things, the staff gets informed and can do something
I won't miss him
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Some people would pay too. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
I can't see any of the comments on this one either: How can I send SMS using mobile phone in C# window application?[^] - and I just got an email of a comment from NotPolitcallyCorrect on my reply - part of a "chain" of half a dozen, ten, something like that.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
This is turning out to be a gnarly one. We've put in a hack (again) to fix it while Matthew continues down the rabbit hole.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
|
It was catched again by the spam filter, probably due to the link.
While a mesage waits for moderation it is shown as "Message removed".
A message shown as "Automatically removed" was already live and has been deleted afterwards by reports.
See also some threads below.
|
|
|
|
|
I do know that. The point is why it mark/considers my message like that. This is not the first time to happen.
|
|
|
|
|
Low rep user, only a few messages posted and the post contains a link. It is fundamentally the dictionary definition of spam. Of course the filter (which is heuristic) catches it.
DURA LEX, SED LEX
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP. -- TNCaver
When I was six, there were no ones and zeroes - only zeroes. And not all of them worked. -- Ravi Bhavnani
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think you realize that I able to post few message without issues before. The question is why now it being considers as issue. The funny part the same thing happened in Bug and Suggestions section too.
|
|
|
|
|
Member 12682271 wrote: The question is why now it being considers as issue
Easy, as Jochen Arndt has explained the spam filter has been hardened up recently because of large amounts of inappropriate posts. That means that many more genuine messages are caught as potential spam.
Peter Wasser
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell
|
|
|
|
|
According to your definition, "The spam filter has been hardened" mean remove appropriate message. This is funny.
|
|
|
|
|
Think about it. How does the filter know if the message is appropriate or inappropriate? It just applies rules. This has all been well explained in other posts. It may pay to go over them.
Peter Wasser
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell
|
|
|
|
|
"Think about it". Why me, let the owner figure it out about the bug.
modified 12-Jan-17 17:55pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Member 12682271 wrote: Why me, let the owner figure it out about the bug.
It isn't a bug.
It's a feature. It's designed to prevent (or at least reduce) the amount of inappropriate posts we get - to let you read the site a whole lot more easily. Unfortunately, your posts pressed all the right buttons for the automated system and it sent you to moderation so that a human being could decide if the message should be allowed through, or your account crushed like a bug. That takes a little time - not much, generally - because all the moderators are volunteers, most of us with paying work to do and that means it can take minutes to get a message approved.
Have a little patience! It doesn't take long, and it isn't anything personal - it's an automatic system doing it's best to prevent you from being flooded with rubbish!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
