|
Aha. Here it goes. This is the catch! Waiting my moment. BTW, if you don't bring a solution(my message to be shown), no need to answer my question. You are not the right person to solve the problem. Just you are opening useless conversation.
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen Gonzalez wrote: Just you are opening useless conversation.
Ahhh, that hurts my feelings.  I was totally enthralled by your side of the conversation. Sorry for dropping the ball. I shall never speak to you again. 
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
This is another useless conversation that doesn't relate to my problem. Do a favor for yourself, check yourself, mentally plus altitude.
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen Gonzalez wrote: check yourself, mentally plus altitude.
Done. Mostly there and at about 1000 ft above sea level. What else can I do for you?
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: What else can I do for you?
As you said it before Please don't replay to my message. You are not the right person for the solution of the problem. You quickly turned my problem to useless conversation.
modified 26-Aug-16 16:00pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Can you please provide a link to the message you were replying to and I'll take a look.
There are lots and lots of members online ready to approve messages. Maybe yours was inadvertently marked as spam or abusive? One never knows how the community will react.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Well, it shown now after an hour since I posted. [^].
|
|
|
|
|
Just for curiosity's sake: was that reply to Super Lloyd meant to be sarcastic or genuine?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I was referring to the member name since I can't post the link at that moment since it wasn't shown publicly. why I be sarcastic on that message. Have you read my reply to message?
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen Gonzalez wrote: Have you read my reply to message?
The reply that says "So you wake up this earily(Australia if you really are there the time is around 5:00AM) to post a FB password issue. You are hero my friend."
Yes. Hence my question.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
How so? I'm admiring his ability, wake up at that earily and posting that issue here. And my message doesn't contain spam.
|
|
|
|
|
Take a look at my question. I wasn't stating anything: I was asking a question.
Thanks for clarifying it.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: Thanks for clarifying it
You're welcome. The spam and sarcasm filter need to be adjusted. Some more AI learning should be feed.
|
|
|
|
|
- Open Any Article
- Download Source
- (it will redirect to File Download)
- Now Change the Layout given at the bottom of the page(Fixed|Fluid)
- Return to Article went off !!
|
|
|
|
|
Message Removed
modified 29-Aug-16 9:28am.
|
|
|
|
|
[Test]
private void ReticulateTheSplinesTest()
{
var map = GetMapWithoutReticulatedSplines();
map.RetirculateSplines();
Assert.IsTrue(map.SplineStatus == Status.Reticulated);
}
[Test] should be a nice calming shade of pale blue. I need calming about now. 
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
It should, and it's one of the few bits of syntax our colouriser has issues with.
I'll have another crack at it and see if I can bludgeon it into submission.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I looked through my email. I saw a few posts asking to fill out a survey. I did not see an email to confirm my address. What to do?
_______________________________________________________________
Ah don't lean on me man, cause you can't afford the ticket
|
|
|
|
|
I've tried sending another. Is it perhaps in you spam folder?
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Given the particularly high number of votes that it takes to close an article due to the sheer number of reasons to choose from, would it be possible to group them together behind the scenes so that 10 votes of a similar grouping is enough to close the article? As an example, if some people chose to close because it's the wrong type while others choose to close an article as poor quality, these would be grouped together. That way, we would lower the barrier to removing substandard articles and reduce the chance of some stinkers getting through.
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
That's possible.
It's always a delicate thing when it comes to fiddling with the Caesar-like thumbs-up/thumbs-down system.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
|
These new accounts can vote all they like but they don't have much actual voting power as they are weighted so, 5 upvotes by a new account can be all but wiped out by a 1 vote from Marc Clifton (as an example).
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
True, but still, it would help the voting system, since this would remove the "in effect" votings of an author, that want to promote his or hers article, with an fake account.
With great code, comes great complexity, so keep it simple stupid... 
|
|
|
|
|
I have to admit that I don't really find the votes on an article make any useful metric. I have seen some absolute stinkers of articles have high votes from people who have had accounts for a long time.
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
