|
DevOps? I refuse to recognise this word. It doesn't merit being a word, let alone one which doesn't comply with the normal rules of grammar.
Mindless jargon.
Regards,
Rob Philpott.
|
|
|
|
|
I suppose they could call it Dev Ops but then you'd get all these validation errors from lame systems so then there'd be a fight between the C crown wanted dev_ops, the wev developer crowd wanting dev-ops, VB guys wanting DEV_OPS, the SQL crowd chanting for [Dev Ops] and the C# guys pushing for devOps.
You're never going to win.
Now shall we debate the term "Internet of Things"? I'll need something stronger in my glass if we do.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Just never heard of this... Maybe I need to dig more deeper.
The sh*t I complain about
It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem
~! Firewall !~
|
|
|
|
|
agree with you
|
|
|
|
|
Hard to fit this description unless it's a team of one. Which I have been in the past and thoroughly enjoyed
|
|
|
|
|
I have no idea how it is in the rest of the world, but here at the company I work at, if you have a IT related problem, you fix it yourself. If it requires an IT professional (for, lets say a password) you try to live with it. Yes, for any IT related problems to get resolved there is a long, very long waiting period. When you do get service, you better hope that the issue can be resolved immediately, otherwise you fall into the hole of trying to get this IT person helping you with your problem to complete what he started.
"Program testing can be used to show the presence of bugs, but never to show their absence."
<< please vote!! >></div>
|
|
|
|
|
This poll doesn't make any sense.
DevOps is not about an individual, it's about a multi-disciplinary team that works together towards a common goal.
There's no such thing as "The DevOps Guy" or the "DevOps Team"; if you keep thinking like this, you're not breaking the silos, you're just creating new ones.
|
|
|
|
|
"a multi-disciplinary team that works together towards a common goal"
a unicorn
|
|
|
|
|
...riding a dragon...
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP. -- TNCaver
"When you have eliminated the JavaScript, whatever remains must be an empty page." -- Mike Hankey
"just eat it, eat it"."They're out to mold, better eat while you can" -- HobbyProggy
|
|
|
|
|
RugbyLeague wrote: a unicorn
This gets a genuine LOL!! I guess because it is so true.
George Bernard Shaw wrote: “When a thing is funny, search it carefully for a hidden truth.”
|
|
|
|
|
A unicorn is to keep managing projects the same failed way and still expecting that, by some sort miracle, "this time it will be different".
At the end, finger pointing is the best way to propel a career.
|
|
|
|
|
AlexCode wrote: it's about a multi-disciplinary team
AlexCode wrote: there's no such thing as "The DevOps Guy" or the "DevOps Team"
Huh? I think you are contradicting yourself. Anyway, the term "DevOps" is lame...imho.
|
|
|
|
|
When I say that there's no such thing as a DevOps team is in the sense that you don't add a DevOps team to your existing team; instead, you change the culture of your existing team in order to go from a group-of-people-sitting-in-the-same-room to a Team.
Regarding the name... yeah, it's far from clear; sounds better than SCRUM tho
|
|
|
|
|
and nice metaphor too ...
"IT special forces" sounds much better than
"are you a multi-competence person ?"
|
|
|
|
|
Tachyonx wrote: "IT special forces" sounds much better than
"are you a multi-competence person ?"
That still sounds better than the actual answer "I am a slave".
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP. -- TNCaver
"When you have eliminated the JavaScript, whatever remains must be an empty page." -- Mike Hankey
"just eat it, eat it"."They're out to mold, better eat while you can" -- HobbyProggy
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well, after all special forces do the "dirty work" while janitors' work deals with dirt...
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP. -- TNCaver
"When you have eliminated the JavaScript, whatever remains must be an empty page." -- Mike Hankey
"just eat it, eat it"."They're out to mold, better eat while you can" -- HobbyProggy
|
|
|
|
|
The phrasing of the question make it effectively a loaded one. I seriously doubt that many people who responded are genuinely DevOps, it is more likely they want to identify with phrases like "You're IT Special Forces".
|
|
|
|
|
I agree with you, and "You're IT Special Forces" is pretty much the opposite of what DevOps proposes.
I've seen enough cases where the "fire man" is actually part of the root cause of the fire; the guy that didn't do the work properly in the first place.
Rewarding heroics is (or should be) a complex decision.
|
|
|
|
|
|
but I would never use that term.
|
|
|
|
|
You don't consider yourself "special forces" material?
I mean, we all know the term "DevOps" was created by some nerds who were anything but, special forces.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, in the parlance of the U.S. Army -- I'm an IT department of one.
(At least I have been, several times, but not currently.)
|
|
|
|
|
GSD-Op Getting stuff done!
|
|
|
|
|
KMHDGSD-Op Keeping my head down, getting stuff done!
|
|
|
|