|
I have my blog linked with my codeproject account, my 4 posts are synced and got published on codeproject, they all are written in 2015 but i have a old post on my blog which i have updated recently and when i am adding the tag which i added to previous posts for getting consumed on codeproject, the post is not getting consumed.
It looks like it only cosuming current year posts ? why it is not consuming post earlier than 2015?
|
|
|
|
|
Already talked about it in the Lounge: since a few days I do not have the edition bar anymore. Quite annoying actually.
And I'm not a big fan of the "Click here to view the range of emoticons available", either; it was way better when there was no need to click to view the icons.
I never finish anyth
|
|
|
|
|
I'm actually discussing it with Chris in the Lounge thread (he still tries to find a solution). For me it came up with the update to Firefox 42 (at home and at work).
Johnny J. who has started the Lounge thread posted a message that it is working now for him. But he uses Windows 8.1 while I use Windows 7.
|
|
|
|
|
It may effectively be due to the update of FF to 42.
Strangely, this morning the toolbar is back on IE.
I never finish anyth
|
|
|
|
|
Works on my machine in Firefox 42.0, Although I do have a 17.3" screen.
@Chris-Maunder, could the issue be related to some kind of problem detecting screen size in FF42?
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
No, it's purely browser detection. The issue is due to a bad cache. I'm loathe to nuke the entire cache because it will slow things down for a few hours. I was hoping that precision strikes would fix the main cases but it's being a little recalcitrant.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Bad Cache! Bad! Sit. Stay. NO! Bad, Bad Cache!
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
Firefox 42? Which OS?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: Firefox 42? Which OS?
Yes, FF42 on Win 7 Entreprise N. I'm quicly building a VM to test this association in a fresh OS, though, because I'm not confident about the system on which the issue occurs. I'll tell you the result soon.
I never finish anyth
|
|
|
|
|
Well I have no problem with the same combination on a fresh OS. Maybe a profile problem; tomorrow I'll try to delete my user profile and create a brand new one.
I never finish anyth
|
|
|
|
|
http://www.codeproject.comscript/articles/submit.aspx[^]
Now, if there was an index that I could see and pick words out of to arrive at the content I wished to know something about, I could cut to the chase and wouldn't have to wade through tons of descriptive nonsense which wasn't relevant to my use of the help file.
Or, if you prefer, a box to tick that said "search in previous find set" ... which would allow me to whittle down the suspected meanings of other's doings.
One word, my word, wouldn't be BAD.
|
|
|
|
|
The link is missing the "/" between the "com" and the "script". That's going to generate an error at the browser level (domain not found). A bad link like this isn't something we can handle at our end since the link never gets to CodeProject. The only way we can handle it is by trying harder to never publish bad links in the first place.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Ok,
So I hope I'm not being too much of a nerd by appending my bug report with this info/rider .. this paste of mine above was a contextual "copy link" plop into the cp message box from this morning's news emailing ...
Wouldn't that make the ommision of the "/", uhm, a mistake on codeproject's end?
(if, it's deep sarcasm with which you have graciously replied to my somewhat dishonest initial post, that's fine too. My skin IS thick. But I can still breath through it.)
|
|
|
|
|
RedDk wrote: Wouldn't that make the ommision of the "/", uhm, a mistake on codeproject's end?
It most absolutely would. That was my fault and I should have caught it earlier.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The article is there in S&A, yes - but it needs to be killed via "Spam" reports to send it to the automated system. And since I have no idea if that is working, I thought it best to bring it to Hamster attention.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Ah yes. Reminiscent of yesterday's Q&A.
Actually the spam report seems to get through - just tested.
Peter Wasser
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell
modified 9-Nov-15 4:01am.
|
|
|
|
|
That's interesting, I'm getting a hamster party just like Griff.
|
|
|
|
|
I get it after I report as spam but my report is immediately acknowledged in reputation.
Peter Wasser
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell
|
|
|
|
|
This should now be fixed.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I guess you feed the hamsters to keep them from eating the servers, eh?
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
Hamsters are herbivores, they don't like spam.
|
|
|
|
|
I was talking about the error image of them eating the servers.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
I have posted a few things recently and have noticed that the code blocks are stuffing up a bit recently .. have not noticed this behaviour previously ... check out this one for eg:
My comment[^]
... it has put a phantom <pre> in there ??? and generally stuffed the whole thing up
I cannot go and edit it because it is correct when I go to edit it  ..
Has anyone else noticed this ??
Thanks,
Kris
modified 8-Nov-15 11:04am.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
