|
Chris Maunder wrote: Firefox 42? Which OS?
Yes, FF42 on Win 7 Entreprise N. I'm quicly building a VM to test this association in a fresh OS, though, because I'm not confident about the system on which the issue occurs. I'll tell you the result soon.
I never finish anyth
|
|
|
|
|
Well I have no problem with the same combination on a fresh OS. Maybe a profile problem; tomorrow I'll try to delete my user profile and create a brand new one.
I never finish anyth
|
|
|
|
|
http://www.codeproject.comscript/articles/submit.aspx[^]
Now, if there was an index that I could see and pick words out of to arrive at the content I wished to know something about, I could cut to the chase and wouldn't have to wade through tons of descriptive nonsense which wasn't relevant to my use of the help file.
Or, if you prefer, a box to tick that said "search in previous find set" ... which would allow me to whittle down the suspected meanings of other's doings.
One word, my word, wouldn't be BAD.
|
|
|
|
|
The link is missing the "/" between the "com" and the "script". That's going to generate an error at the browser level (domain not found). A bad link like this isn't something we can handle at our end since the link never gets to CodeProject. The only way we can handle it is by trying harder to never publish bad links in the first place.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Ok,
So I hope I'm not being too much of a nerd by appending my bug report with this info/rider .. this paste of mine above was a contextual "copy link" plop into the cp message box from this morning's news emailing ...
Wouldn't that make the ommision of the "/", uhm, a mistake on codeproject's end?
(if, it's deep sarcasm with which you have graciously replied to my somewhat dishonest initial post, that's fine too. My skin IS thick. But I can still breath through it.)
|
|
|
|
|
RedDk wrote: Wouldn't that make the ommision of the "/", uhm, a mistake on codeproject's end?
It most absolutely would. That was my fault and I should have caught it earlier.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The article is there in S&A, yes - but it needs to be killed via "Spam" reports to send it to the automated system. And since I have no idea if that is working, I thought it best to bring it to Hamster attention.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Ah yes. Reminiscent of yesterday's Q&A.
Actually the spam report seems to get through - just tested.
Peter Wasser
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell
modified 9-Nov-15 4:01am.
|
|
|
|
|
That's interesting, I'm getting a hamster party just like Griff.
|
|
|
|
|
I get it after I report as spam but my report is immediately acknowledged in reputation.
Peter Wasser
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell
|
|
|
|
|
This should now be fixed.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I guess you feed the hamsters to keep them from eating the servers, eh?
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
Hamsters are herbivores, they don't like spam.
|
|
|
|
|
I was talking about the error image of them eating the servers.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
I have posted a few things recently and have noticed that the code blocks are stuffing up a bit recently .. have not noticed this behaviour previously ... check out this one for eg:
My comment[^]
... it has put a phantom <pre> in there ??? and generally stuffed the whole thing up
I cannot go and edit it because it is correct when I go to edit it  ..
Has anyone else noticed this ??
Thanks,
Kris
modified 8-Nov-15 11:04am.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I was evaluating codeblocks on RPi and was doing good for a while then started getting a phantom error and could never resolve it so gave it up.
New version: WinHeist Version You didn't fall from the stupid tree you got dragged through the whole dumbass forest.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, I have come across this occasionally. It is something to do with the way CP guesses that some text is trying to use markdown. But, as suggested, you should report this sort of thing in Bugs'n'Sugs.
|
|
|
|
|
It's Markdown - it does that when you have a double blank in a code block:
if (a == b)
DoSomething();
else
DoSomethingElse(); It looks ok in the preview, but it stuffs it when posted.
It also removes doubled back slashes: \\ in favour of a single one from time to time.
Needless to say, it won't do it this time, just to be annoying...
Even if it's disabled, it still does it from time to time.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Every question I open, it goes to a page where I see hamsters, which says...
Quote: Something bad happened
We're not sure what, but we have a few guesses.
Problem: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.
Ticket: 7887077
Server: Web04
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah
Object reference not set to an instance of an object.
Cheers
KR
|
|
|
|
|
|
How embarrassing. I fixed it until it broke.
Should be ok now.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
