|
I work in hi-tech high performance environments and hope to do so for as much as I can, so .Net and Java are no-no for me.
|
|
|
|
|
So you're answer is "C++ whatever the question"?
|
|
|
|
|
Nagy Vilmos wrote: So you're answer is "C++ whatever the question"? 42
FTFY
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Practically, yes. If something can't be done in C++ it is worthless to do anyway  Jokes aside I prefer native environments and luckily my field *requires* maximum speed and responsiveness.
|
|
|
|
|
If that is the case why are you using a high level language like C++? Why don't you man up and start writing everything in pure assembly?
|
|
|
|
|
I did with a conspicuous number of routines that must be called several tens of times per second, like image flipping and rotating, normalization of detector raw inputs, gamma-contrast LUVing and applying Sobel and intgerating by columns over large images.
The normal constraint is to acquire and elaborate a 1024x1024 16 bit image in under 100 ms, where elaboration means applying over 40 algorithms to detect glass, metal and stone inclusions and contaminations inside packaged products, with pieces as small as 0.8 mm.
|
|
|
|
|
woow.... your doing real work.
|
|
|
|
|
Testing with different browsers is bad enough, but you'll get all sorts of crazy stuff messing around with different operating systems. Even if you're running a particular .Net framework, applications behave differently on versions of Windows Server or if you're doing 64 bit instead of 32 bit.
So I'll stick with Windows when developing in .Net.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
