|
If I get it correctly by upvoting bugs we can push them up on the list toward solution...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
I am not sure. If it is, it should not be. e.g. regardless of votes this post get, we all know there's bug and hence it should be resolved. Its good idea in case of Suggestion.
In addition to that its worth to note that this[^] still shows in progress.[Nested bug.. ]
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
modified 9-Jul-14 17:03pm.
|
|
|
|
|
See Chris' post below...
The idea to see what bug most anoy people. It doesn't mean others will not be fixed, but that way the staff can create order...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
Bingo!
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Message Removed
modified 9-Jul-14 8:56am.
|
|
|
|
|
I think we have a bug. Can you please try now?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not complaining about the loss of points, just the odd behavior...
My Reputation history page shows this as downvoted over an hour ago, but the Solution itself says "Rating = 0.00 (No votes)".
Convert number to special word format - Solution 2[^]
It's just odd...
(I'd think that an hour would be long enough to rule out synchronization between servers as the issue. But could be...)
A positive attitude may not solve every problem, but it will annoy enough people to be worth the effort.
|
|
|
|
|
I can see one vote(2*).
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
OK, now I see it.
There must be quite a bit of latency between the servers...
A positive attitude may not solve every problem, but it will annoy enough people to be worth the effort.
|
|
|
|
|
Caching.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
What? You're handing out cash? I want in on it. Send to my Nigerian account though, it's more secure.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Is it possible to get the account glennPattonWork email & log in details to point to this account as it appears I have managed to mess up altering the my account email, I want to be able to access it from the E-mail address this account I wasn't aware of, appears to have been used. In the ensuing mess of today I managed to change the email to a gmail account and reapplied for a password which didn't arrive... Also it appears that this account was set up without my knowing, so how safe is it?
Glenn
|
|
|
|
|
I've emailed you to help resolve this.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
If I click on the vote button a message comes showing "you have not answered question 1".
Is this message logically correct?
if not debug it.
|
|
|
|
|
Laiju k wrote: Is this message logically correct? Is it not? Did you answer question 1?
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
I am not mentioning about 1
|
|
|
|
|
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Any way to make everything secure or non-secure? Those mixed content warnings are a pita. (I assume it's images...somewhere on the page.)
|
|
|
|
|
in IE, go to Settings->Security->Custom Level->Under Miscellaneous Tab->Display Mixed content. Enable it.
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
Can't. We're not allowed to change (most) settings in our browsers. Wheeeee! Security people! Gotta love them. (Because you're not supposed to kill them, or so I've been told.)
|
|
|
|
|
Rohan Leuva wrote: Display Mixed content. Enable it.
Noooooooooo!
If you enable mixed content, you circumvent the main purpose of SSL, which is to ensure that nobody can use a man-in-the-middle attack to modify the page.
http://www.troyhunt.com/2013/06/understanding-risk-of-mixed-content.html[^]
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
I agree! Don't break your own security in order to fix their insecurity! I made my entire site to go into secure mode, before the first page is served. No man-in-the-middle attacks for me, please. I know it's supposed to produce more overhead. But I think the trade-off is worth it. I'd never tell my browser that it's OK to have mixed content. I'd rather be warned and make my own decision about whether I want to view the content.
I do find it disparaging when a site has a link to the log-in page on a page that is in non-secure mode.
Dana
|
|
|
|
|
On which page are you seeing this?
We've had some issues with ads serving up non-SSL content and I have personally offered to fly to the marketing agency and show them, using small words, how to fix their stuff, but that issues was (I was assured) fixed.
If you can consistently replicate it then send me the page and steps, or if it's random then send me a dump of the page's HTML and we'll debug.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
It's random. For instance, just now it was on my account page...but then going back to it, it was gone. Must be an Ad serving non-SSL.
I grab the sources of any pages that do it and send them next time it happens.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks!
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|