|
Home? Relaxing?
Is it wrong that I'm in the office and just realised it's Saturday?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: Is it wrong that I'm in the office and just realised it's Saturday?
Not at all, unless Mrs. Chris thinks so... 
Now that I've arrived back home, I've tested it and I can positively confirm you that no window/option appears, when I try to paste anything on the text a messagebox appears asking if I allow to access the clipboard and then the format apocalypse happens...
|
|
|
|
|
Joan Murt wrote: a messagebox appears asking if I allow to access the clipboard and then the format apocalypse happens
Do you, perchance, have your security settings defaults changed?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Strange, strange...
I can paste everywhere without issues (i.e. here I could paste whatever I would like to)...
I've disabled antivirus (I got Norton as it came with my wife...  ).
I've went to IE10 internet options and set everything back to defaults.
Still the same behavior, except for the fact now the article starts directly messed up when I try to edit it... 
PS: and now it seems the codeproject TV, pending to read items, user name, current points, sign out and the orange cross are not appearing to the right even I got fluid mode selected...
|
|
|
|
|
I've resetted everything regarding IE10: Ctrl+Shift+Del to remove any cookie,...
After reentering my log in details I've seen everything again correctly.
But when I try to edit any article or tip/trick I get this:
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/824/ohj2.jpg[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Hmm.
1. To save me hunting time, can you please send me the link to your tip
2. Have you tried this on another browser?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Of course I can: here is the Tip. Anyway this happens with any article / tip I've posted lately... In this one[^]I had to copy the image names from the right side of the editing window as it happened the same when pasting anything into the edition control.
Note: in all cases, pressing CTRL+Z went back to the correct format... 
It works with chrome in windows XP...
I'm using IE10 in Win7...
Thank you! 
|
|
|
|
|
I have just realize that...
If you report an Article or a Q&A Message, then you can see in the reputation history that you have only reported what you clicked. If it is necessary you should report the user as well for the infractions.
If you report a forum message, then you get two entries in the history, one is a Downvote for the forum message and the second one a report for the user.
Is it so by design or is it a bug? In my opinion, it should be as in the articles. You report the message, not the user.
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is on purpose because it's a listing forum, not a discussion forum
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
As per me If i am posting articles on data warehouse then how can i place it in general database section, or if doing post on SSIS,SSAS,SSRS then not finding sepereate categories for them, (excluding SSRS we can post under reporting services).
So if we have seperation on these then it will be easy to place proper article at proper place.
Is this possible to add new categories? i think if i am posting my article of ssis, ssas under database or reporting service then it will not justice to my article.
please take some action.
Regards
Mubin M. Shaikh
|
|
|
|
|
Why not just use tags like SSIS, SSRS, etc? If CP littered the categories with every technology out there then I think articles would be difficult to find or manage.
|
|
|
|
|
Follwing this thread[^], and shamelessly stealing the idea, I would suggest replacing the [Message automatically removed] by [Message sunshined] or [Message elephanted] or [Message sunshine elephanted] (c) @walterhevedeich
~RaGE();
I think words like 'destiny' are a way of trying to find order where none exists. - Christian Graus
Do not feed the troll ! - Common proverb
|
|
|
|
|
Or a nice litte "Null(Content)ReferenceException"? 
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'll get right on that...
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
If that's how you make bug reports I feel sorry for your dev team 
Maybe describe what the problem is? I see a picture and some stuff you've highlighted with your mouse, whatever "bug" you are describing is not apparent by the picture.
|
|
|
|
|
The code goes over the article info box.
Keep Clam And Proofread
--
√(-1) 23 ∑ π...
And it was delicious.
|
|
|
|
|
Found a way to reproduce it: you need to select some file, then put mouse over the stars for voting. Sometimes thie effect appeared, sometimes not
|
|
|
|
|
Which browser?
Keep Clam And Proofread
--
√(-1) 23 ∑ π...
And it was delicious.
|
|
|
|
|
Oh sorry, i'm terribly sorry!
Was in a hurry, so i had no time to write a good bug report.
It maybe too late now, but my browser is Chrome 29.0.1547.76 m
Sorry again for i wasn't responding, for some reason i didn't get any email notifications 
|
|
|
|
|
This article http://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/ArticleVersion.aspx?waid=91884&aid=648858[^] is in the moderation queue, and when you click on it you get the normal approval header, but with
This is an old version of the currently published article above it.
If you click on the "currently published" link, you get to the article, but with a header:
There is a version that is ready for approval by the community. Would you like to view or edit it?
Click on the "view" link, and you're back to the moderation queue version with its link to where you just came from! 
Sorry, no pictures, I'm on my tablet and can't remember how to takes them... 
This message is manufactured from fully recyclable noughts and ones. To recycle this message, please separate into two tidy piles, and take them to your nearest local recycling centre.
Please note that in some areas noughts are always replaced with zeros by law, and many facilities cannot recycle zeroes - in this case, please bury them in your back garden and water frequently.
|
|
|
|
|
I have seen this as well (and tried explaining it a few posts down). However, I did not see the message you describe on the currently posted article about a new version being in the moderation queue.
[EDIT]
I suspect I don't see the message on the currently published article because I don't have privileges to edit the article.
[/EDIT]
Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
The "there is a newer version" one I can understand - it takes time both to get through the moderation queue and to synchronize the database across gawd-knows how many DB servers the hamsters are running at the moment! Get the wrong couple of minutes, and the article can be approved and out of the queue before the web servers have finished serving the page.
But for that to link to a published version, which links back to the unpublished version even now (over 25 minutes after I first noticed it) means that the synchronisation has gone via Columbia, then the moon, rattled around trying to find any acting ability in Nicholas Cage, given up and only then reported to the web page!
This message is manufactured from fully recyclable noughts and ones. To recycle this message, please separate into two tidy piles, and take them to your nearest local recycling centre.
Please note that in some areas noughts are always replaced with zeros by law, and many facilities cannot recycle zeroes - in this case, please bury them in your back garden and water frequently.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
