|
Manfred R. Bihy wrote: Maybe he just found this site: http://dotnetdomain.blogspot.com/2010/11/running-program-at-startup.html[^]
You're right of course that when content from other sites is posted you have to include a reference from where you "borrowed" it.
That blog is also a plagiarizing of the OP's answer. So it seems, the blog guy copy/pasted the OP's answer, and Sandeep copy/pasted from the blog. Multiple levels of copy/paste-ing
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think this is really plagiarizing.
Yes you answered a similar question with the same answer, but can you really expect all of us to know you did?
If he found the answer by searching the forums here and seeing your answer he could have mentioned your post yes.
But if we have to remember every answer ever giving by every member just so we don't run the risk of plagiarizing someone then I'm afraid no answers will be given ever.
I does appear to be a exact copy paste from your answer so in my personal opinion he should have just linked to your post but isn't the main purpose of the forums & Q/A to answer questions?
Just my 2 cents, I'll let the powers that be decide
|
|
|
|
|
Tom Deketelaere wrote: I does appear to be a exact copy paste from your answer so in my personal opinion he should have just linked to your post but isn't the main purpose of the forums & Q/A to answer questions?
Yeah, since it was a letter by letter copy/paste, he should have just linked to the thread.
BTW I had wrongly assumed that the OP was saying I was involved and I also incorrectly assumed that it was my answer, since it showed my name too, albeit under the edited by column. I have quickly edited/corrected all my replies which must have seemed like utter nonsense to the poor OP
|
|
|
|
|
Nishant Sivakumar wrote: which must have seemed like utter nonsense to the poor OP
And that's different than any of your other posts?
|
|
|
|
|
Touche!
|
|
|
|
|
He might forgot to made a link to your answer/blog answer/Nish's answer.
Also I have used his Tip/Trick for my answer some times.
Recently Answer 1[^] & Answer 2[^]
IMO he is a good answerer.
|
|
|
|
|
thatraja wrote:
IMO he is a good answerer.
I know Raja he is very good answerer.
|
|
|
|
|
Ah, but whose answers does he give?
------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
CCC League Table Link
CCC Link[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
Could someone please copy/paste the question and answer into this thread, with all this chit-chat I have forgotten what it was about.
|
|
|
|
|
If you look at some of the bottom posts, you'll find that this thread has taken a turn for the emotional!
|
|
|
|
|
Ho!!! Thats some post... I was totally unaware of.
Firstly, I did respond back to you some 8 hours back, here[^].
Then, I just saw few comments right now and responded back again. You can check my answer/comment to your question raised: http://www.codeproject.com/Answers/144431/Application-to-be-started-at-startup.aspx?cmt=40585#answer5[^]
I had no clue that it could have hurt you/anyone so much! I can maximum apologize and delete my answer if that satisfies you. Though I had/have no intention to pick someone else work and show as mine.
I would appriciate, if you tell me also (directly) from next time if you have any issues with me.
|
|
|
|
|
oh my god it my apologies I haven't read your comment. but why you commented there[^]
you can comment there[^]
right now i have read your comment and replayed back
Sandeep Mewara wrote: I can maximum apologize and delete my answer if that satisfies you
there is no need to delete your answer i was wrong that I pinned you.
please forgive me Sandeep I am taking you wrong.
modified on Monday, January 10, 2011 10:45 PM
|
|
|
|
|
RaviRanjankr wrote: please forgive me sandeep I am taking you wrong.
I feeling very guilty please forgive me.
Dude, you didn't do anything wrong
Sandeep has honestly apologized to you, so the best you can do is to accept his apology and move on.
This is a programming forum, not a soap drama!
|
|
|
|
|
Nishant Sivakumar wrote: This is a programming forum, not a soap drama!
oh! thanks Nish to let me know this is programming forum
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nishant Sivakumar wrote: This is a programming forum, not a soap drama!
Are you sure?
The header says "It is not for programming or other questions."
|
|
|
|
|
Well, that explains it then
|
|
|
|
|
Nishant Sivakumar wrote:
This is a programming forum, not a soap drama
It was fun while it lasted
cheers,
Super
------------------------------------------
Too much of good is bad,mix some evil in it
|
|
|
|
|
Is this link (found under the reputation graph) only available for certain users? I've found several fairly new users that don't have it.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010 ----- You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010 ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
I believe you are only supposed to be able to see your own. You shouldn't be able to see mine, for instance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
John's talking about the proxy accounts he uses to have a fight with when no one else is available.
|
|
|
|
|
He sock puppets himself into anger!
------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
CCC League Table Link
CCC Link[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
In my experience it comes and goes. Yesterday, I did not get it on my rep tab, today it is there.
Anyway I think it is not in the right place, as I often want it, without needing the graph (and the load it causes); so I made it a favorite. I would suggest Chris splits the rep tab into a rep graph tab and a rep history tab.
|
|
|
|
|
Strange, I modified the URL to point to your member ID (http://www.codeproject.com/script/Reputation/List.aspx?mid=648011), but it still showed my reputation history rather than yours. I don't think I should ever be able to see your reputation history, but it seems like a flaw that the member ID is included in the query string when that information is not used.
|
|
|
|