|
What's your question? I believe you described about the whole Life Cycle... 
Don't forget to Click on [Vote] and [Good Answer] on the posts that helped you.
Regards - Kunal Chowdhury | Software Developer | Chennai | India | My Blog | My Tweets | Silverlight Tutorial
|
|
|
|
|
Perhaps, I am this one that ... 
|
|
|
|
|
Good Message to all. have a 5 
|
|
|
|
|
Good message.. 5 for that.
|
|
|
|
|
hey you have any project of vb ... 
|
|
|
|
|
Errr yes, in fact I do.
But why ask that here?
|
|
|
|
|
Looks like this could be an interesting subject area.
My first question...
How many people here follow a specific and well defined (either by your organization or via one of the standards) lifecycle?
How closely do you following it (for real )
Do you have different versions for projects of different sizes?
Do you include a cycle a step at the end that evaluates the usefulness of the lifecycle with regards to the project that ran within it?
|
|
|
|
|
sniff, sniff...
Oh, come on folks... I took a shower...
No one wants to come in and talk about application lifecycle?
|
|
|
|
|
I hadn't even noticed the forum mate. I'll get back to you later on today.
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Onyx
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: I'll get back to you later on today.
Turns out Pete lied!
|
|
|
|
|
_Damian S_ wrote: Turns out Pete lied!
It turns out that Pete realised he had nothing interesting to say. I suppose I could have got back and told him this, but it would have been a bit redundant.
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Onyx
|
|
|
|
|
We have a well defined lifecycle, which we follow with a messianic zeal, except for those times when we don't or can't be bothered or the timescale is too tight and the money too good, but apart from that we never deviate.
It's pointless waiting till the end of the project to determine whether or not the lifecycle is actually working. We have quality gates at several key points in the process that we use to determine the actual usefulness of the process to the particular project. There is no, one size fits all, process that we can actually use as we tend to have to fit in with the way the clients work, so while we can agree up front on things such as maintenance releases, release schedules, beta drops, inphase documentation and the likes, other parts have to be fluid and we cope as we see fit.
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Onyx
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
