|
|
|
OK... what is the corresponding command/code in C#
PERL
openssl genrsa -out private-key.pem 1024
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
How can I execute a function for a huge number of users? Say 5000.
In my web application there are more then 5000 users. they all get their revenue based on the business generated by them. The problem is:
The revenue has to be generated daily. If I create a form with text box as user id and a button and on click of the button the function to generate the revenue execute, it is going to take forever for all the users as the query contains deleting, updating, inserting, and other tasks. So how can I create a function that executes for all the users.
|
|
|
|
|
you can pass the where as parameter if no user (specific user ) pass ""(nothing)
|
|
|
|
|
I think you are not getting my point. There is no issue with query. The only thing is that the administrator has to manually create commission for every user. I want this functionality automated. That means the function for creating commission should run for every member at once.
|
|
|
|
|
i think your problem how to call all users ??
if yes then the problem in your query and the solution as i replied before
if No then i am not understand your problem stell
|
|
|
|
|
If I understood well, as soon as the next day arrives your want to execute the query for all users, right?
I use some code that has this type of functionality. Effectivelly, in Global.asax I create a new thread.
That thread will then, in a while(true) (yes, an infinite loop) wait for the next day.
Something like:
DateTime now = DateTime.Now;
DateTime nextDay = now.Date.AddDays(1);
TimeSpan diff = nextDay - now;
Thread.Sleep(diff);
And then, will execute the query for every user, sequentially. This way, you will not have problems when each user calls the method, that will only read the result. The method must only be prepared to know if the SP was run or not.
You can, for example, make every user wait for the SP to run using ReaderWriterLockSlim.
For example, you create a global (static) variable for the lock.
public static ReaderWriterLockSlim GlobalLock = new ReaderWriterLockSlim();
When you run the SP that calculates the values, you do the pattern:
GlobalLock.EnterWriteLock();
try
{
// execute the SP
}
finally
{
GlobalLock.ExitWriteLock();
}
And, at each user read you do:
GlobalLock.EnterReadLock();
try
{
// execute the SP
}
finally
{
GlobalLock.ExitReadLock();
}
This way, the users will wait until the SP finish before reading (considering they are calling the method at midnight).
|
|
|
|
|
This is almost what i was looking for. Thanks. I will try and tell you. Thanks again.
|
|
|
|
|
If I have a c++ app that gets a pointer to a c++ char, will I be able to read that value into a C# char from the address from the c++ app? Or are they incompatible?
|
|
|
|
|
AFAIK IntPtr is the closest you can get through managed code. If there is a method in the dll which returns char*, try getting the return value into an IntPtr and then use it.
50-50-90 rule: Anytime I have a 50-50 chance of getting something right, there's a 90% probability I'll get it wrong...!!
|
|
|
|
|
I can't figure out what is wrong with my c#/c++ code trying to do this...
c# Code
try
{
char c;
string s;
int i;
i = System.Convert.ToInt32(Environment.GetCommandLineArgs()[1]);
unsafe
{
char* charp;
charp = (char*)i;
c = *charp;
}
s = c.ToString();
System.IO.File.WriteAllText("C:\\users\\name\\file.txt", System.IO.File.ReadAllText("C:\\users\\name\\file.txt") + Environment.NewLine + s);
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
MessageBox.Show(ex.Message + Environment.NewLine + ex.InnerException);
}
C++ Code that launches the above and passes the pointer to a char.
int inn = &the_char;
ShellExecute(NULL,NULL,"C:\\csharpfile.exe",inn,NULL,0);
|
|
|
|
|
I cannot figure out what your code is trying to do.
Take the first command line argument and convert it to an integer.
In an unsafe block cast the integer to a character pointer and take the first character of that array.
Convert that character to a string.
Use that string for some purpose.
Did you try running this through the debugger to see what results you are getting?
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I have a sdk written in c++ to control an IP module from .net. I wish to port all these libraries to C#. As i have never written interops, wrappers, or even worked in c++, what are my options. I need to know what i need to know to accomplish making dll's which are compatible to c# or if there are any third party tools that can convert all dll's from C++ to C#.
Thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
If you just need to use the methods that the dll exposes in your C# code, you need to check if the dll is managed or unmanaged. If it is a managed one, add reference to it, create object and call methods.
If it is an unmanaged dll, you can use DllImport attribute. Here[^] a link that might help you.
50-50-90 rule: Anytime I have a 50-50 chance of getting something right, there's a 90% probability I'll get it wrong...!!
|
|
|
|
|
I have got a sample application build around the sdk, its written in VC2003.net. I can add a reference to some of the dll's and ocx files but not all.
I am sending you an email to download the sdk and a sample application within can u please get some time and see into it and tell me what i am up against, it would be really helpful.
I would be really thankfull.
Just tell me what i need to do to start.
Thankyou
|
|
|
|
|
faheemnadeem wrote: I have a sdk written in c++ to control an IP module from .net.
How that SDK exposes its functionality? Do they provide static libraries or DLLs? If they provide static libraries, better option is to create a managed DLL using C++/CLI which has the static libraries linked.
If they provide DLLs, then you can use P/Invoke to communicate with it from C#.
Best wishes,
Navaneeth
|
|
|
|
|
There are converters for this, but you need to have a very good knowledge of both C++ and C# to be capable of making the adjustments to get it working.
If the C++ code makes heavy usage of pointer arithmetic, then you are better off leaving the code in C++.
David Anton
Convert between VB, C#, C++, & Java
www.tangiblesoftwaresolutions.com
|
|
|
|
|
I thought passing an object to another object would be easy, since objects are passed by reference. Wrong.
I've managed to populate the members of an object nicely, using a series of forms for user input - that was no mean feat for me, but it works. The next step in my plan was to pass the object on to another slice of code for handling the interface to a database. If I can get that to work, it's about 75% of what the program has to do. I thought I understood that objects, as reference types, could be passed as parameters to other parts of the program, but I'm having difficulty doing so. In fact, I haven't found anything here or via Google that clearly shows anyone else trying this, so I may be completely off base.
To test my approach without getting into the database can of worms, I thought I'd test ways to do this by creating yet another form, passing the object to it, then extracting the individual members to labels for display. If that works, I can apply the same principles to a database handler module of some kind.
First I tried creating the test form with a constructor that takes one argument - my object. When I instantiated the form I passed the local object as an argument. That compiled nicely, but crashed with an unhandled null object exception. I then tried creating the form without the argument, but before displaying it, set the object member in the display form equal to the local object. Same error. I'm either trying to do something impossible, or I'm missing something important here and have no idea what it is. A partial listing follows:
Calling Form:
frmShowForm frmShowRec = new frmShowForm(Rec);
if (frmShowRec.ShowDialog(this) == DialogResult.OK)
{
frmShowRec.Hide();
frmShowRec.Dispose();
Display Form:
public partial class frmShowForm : Form
{
public frmShowForm(Recloser recshow)
{
Recloser RecShow = new Recloser();
RecShow = recshow;
label1.Text = RecShow.Serial;
this.label2.Text = RecShow.Mfr;
this.label3.Text = RecShow.Type;
this.label4.Text = RecShow.Vrated;
this.label5.Text = RecShow.BIL;
Before anyone comments, I tried the above with and without the 'this' modifier; there was no change in the error message. If either way is preferable (or necessary) I'd appreciate knowing it. This is just the latest attempt, as I've been at it all night trying different approaches to the problem and searching here and with Google. I know I could create a bunch of local variables in the calling form and pass them into the display form, but that would defeat my purpose, which is to accomplish this with as little work as possible. Typical engineer...
Thanks in advance for any assistance!
"A Journey of a Thousand Rest Stops Begins with a Single Movement"
|
|
|
|
|
If you pass recshow as null and do not take care of handling that in the form's constructor, you will get the exception. I could not understand the second approach you have tried so cannot comment on that.
50-50-90 rule: Anytime I have a 50-50 chance of getting something right, there's a 90% probability I'll get it wrong...!!
|
|
|
|
|
I thought I was passing a populated Rec into recshow, but apparently not. Oddly, when I debug the watch window shows the correct values in the fields contained in both RecShow and recshow. The error occurs when it hits the first assignment statement attempting to fill the label variables with individual values from the Recloser object.
"A Journey of a Thousand Rest Stops Begins with a Single Movement"
|
|
|
|
|
If you are passing filled object, it should work.
You are not calling InitializeComponent() in the constructor. Before you use any of the controls in the form, you should call that method. Just add a call to this method in the constructor as the first line and check.
50-50-90 rule: Anytime I have a 50-50 chance of getting something right, there's a 90% probability I'll get it wrong...!!
|
|
|
|
|
I'll be damned... It worked.
The examples I've seen in books all omitted the default Initialize in the constructor when a custom constructor was provided, so I commented it out.
Thanks a bunch! 
"A Journey of a Thousand Rest Stops Begins with a Single Movement"
|
|
|
|
|
Welcome. 
50-50-90 rule: Anytime I have a 50-50 chance of getting something right, there's a 90% probability I'll get it wrong...!!
|
|
|
|
|
I guess a variable has to be initialized to a non-null value before it can be initialized to a specific value. My assignment statements were all in the constructor. That seems weird to me, but I can live with it. Thanks again...
"A Journey of a Thousand Rest Stops Begins with a Single Movement"
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
