Click here to Skip to main content
15,908,581 members
Home / Discussions / Design and Architecture
   

Design and Architecture

 
QuestionException Hierarchy Pin
CodingYoshi29-Dec-08 11:27
CodingYoshi29-Dec-08 11:27 
GeneralRe: Exception Hierarchy Pin
Luc Pattyn29-Dec-08 15:12
sitebuilderLuc Pattyn29-Dec-08 15:12 
GeneralRe: Exception Hierarchy Pin
CodingYoshi30-Dec-08 3:18
CodingYoshi30-Dec-08 3:18 
AnswerRe: Exception Hierarchy Pin
Jon Rista6-Jan-09 8:48
Jon Rista6-Jan-09 8:48 
GeneralRe: Exception Hierarchy Pin
Leftyfarrell6-Jan-09 13:29
Leftyfarrell6-Jan-09 13:29 
GeneralRe: Exception Hierarchy Pin
Jon Rista6-Jan-09 17:31
Jon Rista6-Jan-09 17:31 
GeneralRe: Exception Hierarchy Pin
Curtis Schlak.25-Feb-09 9:02
Curtis Schlak.25-Feb-09 9:02 
AnswerRe: Exception Hierarchy Pin
Curtis Schlak.25-Feb-09 9:20
Curtis Schlak.25-Feb-09 9:20 
I don't think that anyone addressed your first question, so I'll give it a shot.

In OO, encapsulation (or information hiding) concerns the way that we hide the implementation of our class behind a stable design. Thus, if I have the following class
public class Person
{
    public DateTime Birthdate { get{ ... something secret ... } }
    public int Age { get { ... something secret ... } }
}

then it doesn't matter to the code that uses the Person class if the value for Age gets computed from the Birthdate every time, caches the initial calculation in a private int, or uses some fancy Web service to calculate it. We are hiding the internals of the class implementation which, according to OO, everyone else doesn't care about.

Now, in terms of the System.Exception class, it has that property InnerException because, when this is set, the instance of the Exception that you catch was created by another exception which gets stored in that InnerException property. You'll note that the only type information that we have about the InnerException is that it is of type System.Exception, no leakage at all. This does not break encapsulation because, in the context of the creation of the exception that you've caught, another exception was the cause of it and knowing that exception isn't bad. You don't know how the InnerException was set, how the value gets returned to you, or what's going on in the containing exception instance.

Now, if catching code has something like the following somewhere
try
{
    ... exception thrown here ...
}
catch(Exception e)
{
    if(null != e.InnerException)
    {
        if(e.InnerException is SqlException)
        {
            ... do something SqlException specific here ...
        }
    }
}

then I would argue that you did not handle the SqlException deeply enough in your code or that it should not have been caught until now in a separate catch(SqlException se) block.

"we must lose precision to make significant statements about complex systems."
-deKorvin on uncertainty

QuestionWho can show me the process and method of Scrum? Pin
Tal Rasha's Guardianship18-Dec-08 21:32
Tal Rasha's Guardianship18-Dec-08 21:32 
AnswerRe: Who can show me the process and method of Scrum? Pin
Ashfield18-Dec-08 22:01
Ashfield18-Dec-08 22:01 
GeneralRe: Who can show me the process and method of Scrum? Pin
Tal Rasha's Guardianship22-Dec-08 17:17
Tal Rasha's Guardianship22-Dec-08 17:17 
GeneralRe: Who can show me the process and method of Scrum? Pin
Ashfield26-Dec-08 22:40
Ashfield26-Dec-08 22:40 
QuestionArchitecture that supports Unit Testing - Is there such a thing as Too Many Interfaces? Pin
Leftyfarrell18-Dec-08 4:42
Leftyfarrell18-Dec-08 4:42 
AnswerRe: Architecture that supports Unit Testing - Is there such a thing as Too Many Interfaces? Pin
led mike19-Dec-08 7:40
led mike19-Dec-08 7:40 
QuestionRe: Architecture that supports Unit Testing - Is there such a thing as Too Many Interfaces? Pin
Leftyfarrell19-Dec-08 8:08
Leftyfarrell19-Dec-08 8:08 
AnswerRe: Architecture that supports Unit Testing - Is there such a thing as Too Many Interfaces? Pin
Giorgi Dalakishvili19-Dec-08 8:19
mentorGiorgi Dalakishvili19-Dec-08 8:19 
AnswerRe: Architecture that supports Unit Testing - Is there such a thing as Too Many Interfaces? Pin
Mark Churchill22-Dec-08 18:42
Mark Churchill22-Dec-08 18:42 
AnswerRe: Architecture that supports Unit Testing - Is there such a thing as Too Many Interfaces? Pin
CodingYoshi25-Dec-08 21:03
CodingYoshi25-Dec-08 21:03 
AnswerRe: Architecture that supports Unit Testing - Is there such a thing as Too Many Interfaces? [modified] Pin
Jon Rista6-Jan-09 9:01
Jon Rista6-Jan-09 9:01 
GeneralRe: Architecture that supports Unit Testing - Is there such a thing as Too Many Interfaces? Pin
Leftyfarrell6-Jan-09 13:10
Leftyfarrell6-Jan-09 13:10 
GeneralRe: Architecture that supports Unit Testing - Is there such a thing as Too Many Interfaces? Pin
Jon Rista6-Jan-09 13:36
Jon Rista6-Jan-09 13:36 
QuestionRe: Architecture that supports Unit Testing - Is there such a thing as Too Many Interfaces? Pin
Leftyfarrell6-Jan-09 14:13
Leftyfarrell6-Jan-09 14:13 
AnswerRe: Architecture that supports Unit Testing - Is there such a thing as Too Many Interfaces? Pin
Jon Rista6-Jan-09 17:46
Jon Rista6-Jan-09 17:46 
QuestionDownloading URLs with Python ?? Pin
Fuat Mx13-Dec-08 7:25
Fuat Mx13-Dec-08 7:25 
QuestionTDD, Mocks, and Isolating Legacy Application Components? Pin
Philip Laureano8-Dec-08 21:08
Philip Laureano8-Dec-08 21:08 

General General    News News    Suggestion Suggestion    Question Question    Bug Bug    Answer Answer    Joke Joke    Praise Praise    Rant Rant    Admin Admin   

Use Ctrl+Left/Right to switch messages, Ctrl+Up/Down to switch threads, Ctrl+Shift+Left/Right to switch pages.