|
my only watch in on iPhone 3.0 i am expecting
good speakers.
flash
open blue-tooth( it may hurt iTunes)
Multi-tasking system
Better battery
FM RADIO (very small chip, dont know why apple not doing that).
Background apps(for chat etc)
More resolution.
Camera 3.2 - 5.0 with flash.(Way for card scanning apps)
processor speed and more RAM (2.2 really slowed down my gadget)
welcome if apple do any innovation that still do not exist in current mobile world.
RajK
|
|
|
|
|
VS2010 & C# 4 and new features of C# like Dynamic Variables 
|
|
|
|
|
IE8 because IE7 has become so buggy since the last update and my workplace only uses MS products.
- Life is a fountain
|
|
|
|
|
only that few people for Windows Server 2008 R2 ?!
|
|
|
|
|
I for one am waiting for the new Windows Mobile releases. Hopefully they will crash less on my HTC Touch Pro. They could make Windows reasonably stable on the desktop, why can’t they do the same for the mobile edition?
I’m also waiting for some new drivers from HTC... 
Florin Crişan
|
|
|
|
|
do you think WM6.5 will be installable on old HTC ?
|
|
|
|
|
I don’t really know. I know HTC was offering upgrades to Windows Mobile 6.1 for the TyTN II a while ago; I assumed they would do the same for the Touch Pro.
If not, maybe the guys at XDA Developers[^] can do it 
Florin Crişan
|
|
|
|
|
I’ve just checked the HTC support site and apparently they’ve just released an update[^]
Can’t wait to get home to try it out. (I don’t have ActiveSync at work... bloody restrictive corporate environment...)
Florin Crişan
|
|
|
|
|
I'm looking forward for HTC as well.
Try not to become a man of success but rather to become a man of value. - Albert Einstein
Ernest Laurentin
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hear, hear!
Florin Crişan
|
|
|
|
|
But when will there be compliant compilers?
|
|
|
|
|
C++ Builder is there already
|
|
|
|
|
Compliance with unfinished standard? 
|
|
|
|
|
C++ Builder 2009 has only a part of the C++0x implemented (http://www.codegear.com/products/cppbuilder/whats-new/[^][^]):
"The future of C++ starts now with rvalue references to support move semantics and perfect forwarding. Scoped enumerations control names better, while specifying a base type for enums helps control your ABI. Explicit conversion operators avoid needless promotions and reduce ambiguities. Catch errors early with static_assert, especially when combined with native type traits and the new alignof keyword. Enhance your templates with decltype and extern templates."
* rvalue references
* Scoped enumerations
* Explicit conversion operators
* static_assert,
* alignof keyword
* decltype and extern templates
Intel Compiler 11 (http://www.intel.com/software/products/compilers/docs/clin/main_cls/copts/ccpp_options/option_std.htm[^])
* Empty macro arguments
* Variadic macros
* Type long long
* Trailing comma in enum definition
* Concatenation of mixed-width string literals
* Extended friend declarations
* Use of ">>" to close two template argument lists
* Relaxed rules for use of "typename"
* Relaxed rules for disambiguation using the "template" keyword
* Copy constructor does not need to be callable on direct reference
* Binding to class rvalue
* "extern template" to suppress instantiation of an entity
* "auto" type specifier
* decltype operator
* static_assert
* compliant __func__
* lambda expressions
GCC 4.3 (http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.3/cxx0x_status.html[^])
* Rvalue references
* Variadic templates
* Static assertions
* Declared type of an expression
* Right angle bracket
* Default template arguments for function templates
* Extern templates
* __func__ predefined identifier
* C99 preprocessor
* long long
Visual C++ 2010 (http://blogs.msdn.com/vcblog/archive/2008/10/28/lambdas-auto-and-static-assert-c-0x-features-in-vc10-part-1.aspx[^])
* lambdas
* auto
* static_assert
* rvalue references
|
|
|
|
|
Gcc and Intel and a few others have been from design to now compliant. Of course since the design was changing as things were accepted there were versions that matched each design document release. And because of politics, they often ignored some options. But they will all catch up soon.
|
|
|
|
|
The VS2010 CTP has support for some parts of C++0x, like lambdas, type inferring and rvalue references.
Java, Basic, who cares - it's all a bunch of tree-hugging hippy cr*p
|
|
|
|
|
Surely not, this is actually finally happening is it?
Regards,
Rob Philpott.
|
|
|
|
|
Duke Nukem For Never IS is a *new* rumor! I would not hold my breath for its release... it may take a while.
|
|
|
|
|
|
i am waiting for VS 2010. From IDE pont of view VS 2003 is much more faster than VS 2005 and VS 2008. Any idea how VS 2010 will be? microsoft should give emphasis on how faster IDE loads project and give more importance to user expirience. 
|
|
|
|
|
VS 2010 IDE will be completely new: It will WPF based! This is not yet the case with tech previews, but it was confirmed in PDC. The new .Net based extensibility model is there already though.
So, as a first version, I would not put my money on how well it performs. It may perform well, but changes are that it takes at least few service packs or even a new version before they get the performance right.
Having said that, in my opinion it is extremely important release: it will be the first VS that is really .Net based and the impact of that is potentially huge if you think about it from the extensibility point of view: how people are able to write their own aids and extensions.
//Olli
|
|
|
|
|
There is no enough real good browsers that you are waiting for this piece of sh*t? What specifically you wait there that other browsers doesn't already have it?
|
|
|
|
|
Kamarey wrote: What specifically you wait there that other browsers doesn't already have it?
One that has Microsoft's name on it, so the zealots can follow it and still be considered cool amongst their friends.
|
|
|
|
|
I can't believe people still use IE. 
Since Opera 9 came out it's obviously the best browser ever.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
