|
Hi,
How I can convert UTF-8 to Unicode strings on Pocket PC 2000? I tried
MultiByteToWideChar, but it only works with Pocket PC 2002, in Pocket PC
2000 it returns an empty string with GetLastError "Invalid Parameter",
probably because of non suport for this char-set on Pocket PC 2000.
I also tried TnefConvertToUnicode in Tnefapi.h, but my installed
hardware does not support this function (HP Jornada and Compaq iPaqs), and I
tried to build my own conversion function with some code found on the
internet, but it is too slow.
Anybody knows how to convert this kind of string? (any code sample or
open source program that does this will help)
TIA
Guilherme Magalhaes - guilherme@flag.com.br
MCP - MCSD
|
|
|
|
|
Don't need if this will help you, but ::MultiByteToWideChar() is just a wrapper of mbstowcs() (implemented in the C-runtime, thus cross-platform).
MS quote (http://www.microsoft.com/ddk) : As of September 30, 2002, the Microsoft® Windows® 2000 DDK, the Microsoft Windows 98 DDK, and the Microsoft Windows NT® 4.0 DDK will no longer be available for purchase or download on this site.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I've created a user-interface thread using:
m_pDevice = (CDevice*)AfxBeginThread(RUNTIME_CLASS(CDevice),
THREAD_PRIORITY_NORMAL,
0, // stack size
CREATE_SUSPENDED);
Now, the probles is that when the aplication end a get a memory leak ( the m_bAutoDelete of CDevice which is inherited from base class CWinThread is set TRUE by default ).
I've also tryed m_pDevice->Delete() but no succes... I always get :
Detected memory leaks!
Dumping objects ->
{71} client block at 0x00AE64B8, subtype c0, 92 bytes long.
a CDevice object at $00AE64B8, 92 bytes long
Object dump complete.
Thanx
|
|
|
|
|
How do you know if the thread has completed, when your applications ends? The fact that it leaks and that your Delete() call doesn't stop the leak makes me think that the thread is still executing when you are trying to end your application. Put in a WaitForSingleObject() before exiting the application to ensure that the thread completes.
Chris
|
|
|
|
|
Hi world...
I've got some error compilation when I want to catch the address of a method inside his class...
My code is:
int BsCard::InitInterrupt() const
{
void (BsCard:: *intHdl)(HANDLE hCHA_DIG, INT_RESULT* pintResult) = this->InterruptHandler;
if (!IntEnable(m_hCard, intHdl)) {
printf("Enabling Interrupt failed\n");
return ERR_INITINT;
}
return 0;
}
My method who I want to pass her address is:
void BsCard::InterruptHandler(HANDLE hCHA_DIG, INT_RESULT* pintResult)
{
}
My error compilation is:
C:\My Projects VC++\Generic DLL Architecture\MyDLL\RedCode\BsCard.cpp(267) : error C2664: 'IntEnable' : cannot convert parameter 2 from 'void (__thiscall BsCard::*)(struct STRUCT *,INT_RESULT *
)' to 'void (__cdecl *)(struct STRUCT *,INT_RESULT *)'
There is no context in which this conversion is possible
The problems seems to come from the (__cdecl *)... But I'm not sur.
Thanks for any clues...
Hello World!!! 
from Raphaël
|
|
|
|
|
void (__stdcall BsCard:: *intHdl)(HANDLE hCHA_DIG, INT_RESULT* pintResult)
MS quote (http://www.microsoft.com/ddk) : As of September 30, 2002, the Microsoft® Windows® 2000 DDK, the Microsoft Windows 98 DDK, and the Microsoft Windows NT® 4.0 DDK will no longer be available for purchase or download on this site.
|
|
|
|
|
Make the method static. This has obvious limitations: if you need to circumvent them, check Mike Dunn's VC++ FAQ[^], §6.1.
Joaquín M López Muñoz
Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo
|
|
|
|
|
Here's some example code that can at least point you in the right direction:
class BsCard
{
public:
typedef void (BsCard::*FuncPtr)(HANDLE hCHA_DIG, INT_RESULT* pintResult);
void InterruptHandler(HANDLE hCHA_DIG, INT_RESULT* pintResult);
bool IntEnable(int, FuncPtr){return true;};
int InitInterrupt1();
int InitInterrupt2();
int m_hCard;
};
int BsCard::InitInterrupt1()
{
void (BsCard::*intHdl)(HANDLE hCHA_DIG, INT_RESULT* pintResult) = this->InterruptHandler;
if (!IntEnable(m_hCard, intHdl)) {
printf("Enabling Interrupt failed\n");
return ERR_INITINT; // Enabling Interrupt failed
}
return 0;
}
int BsCard::InitInterrupt2()
{
FuncPtr intHdl = this->InterruptHandler;
if (!IntEnable(m_hCard, intHdl)) {
printf("Enabling Interrupt failed\n");
return ERR_INITINT; // Enabling Interrupt failed
}
return 0;
}
void BsCard::InterruptHandler(HANDLE hCHA_DIG, INT_RESULT* pintResult)
{
}
Using above method, it's going to be hard to keep your InitInterrupt as a const type.
I recommend you change it to a none-constant function.
|
|
|
|
|
I got a string represented by std::string. I want to remove all the leading and trailing spaces from it and and not the spaces in the middle. How ????
|
|
|
|
|
find_first_of() and find_last_of().
|
|
|
|
|
Look here[^].
Joaquín M López Muñoz
Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo
|
|
|
|
|
Example functions:
void TrimLeft(std::string &Src, char c = ' ')
{
while(Src.size() && Src[0] == c) Src.erase(0,1);
}
void TrimRight(std::string &Src, char c = ' ')
{
while(Src.size() && Src[Src.size()-1] == c) Src.erase(Src.size()-1,1);
}
Example usuage:
int main(int argc, char* argv[])
{
std::string Data1 = " Hello World";
std::string Data2 = "Hello World ";
std::string Data3 = " Hello World ";
std::string Data4 = " ";
std::string Data5 = "";
TrimLeft(Data1);
TrimLeft(Data2);
TrimLeft(Data3);
TrimLeft(Data4);
TrimLeft(Data5);
TrimRight(Data1);
TrimRight(Data2);
TrimRight(Data3);
TrimRight(Data4);
TrimRight(Data5);
return 0;
}
|
|
|
|
|
Hi..
Currently i'm develop one application on desktop...There are two version
1st version are written in VC++ and another version in VB 6.0...but the speed between this two application is within 4 - 9 second...Actually this application do is read a data from the SmartCard....
:_Rocket_:
|
|
|
|
|
I've created a 3 Pane Splitter using two splitter windows like a T on its side:-
|-
I have an Control in the bottom right hand side,
When I move the column splitter the Scrollbars disapear for the control, and only reapear if i move the row (-) splitter bar,
What function to i need to call after an OnSize to ENSURE that the entire client area is drawn?
Asim Hussain
e: asim@jawache.net
w: www.jawache.net
|
|
|
|
|
Dear all,
Correct me if I'm wrong, is memory leak due to not using delete after a new?
Is there a program to check my program for memory leak?
Thanks
Chun Te, Ewe
|
|
|
|
|
Chun Te, Ewe wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong, is memory leak due to not using delete after a new?
Yes. Or using delete instead of delete[] for an array made with new[]
Chun Te, Ewe wrote:
Is there a program to check my program for memory leak?
'BoundsChecker' or 'Purify' spring to my mind. Both are big money, but very good.
|
|
|
|
|
jhwurmbach wrote:
'BoundsChecker' or 'Purify' spring to my mind. Both are big money, but very good.
Are there any freewares around?
|
|
|
|
|
Not really.... the tools available are really for checking whether you are going past array bounds or accessing memory that hasn't been allocated. VC++ tells you when you have a memory leak and thats about as much help as your going to get anywhere.
There are a number of good articles here about how to trace your memory leaks better, look in 'Programming Tips'
Asim Hussain
e: asim@jawache.net
w: www.jawache.net
|
|
|
|
|
Just being obnoxious: if I'm not mistaking the 'delete[]'-syntax is no longer needed when trying to delete an array. Following code does exactly the same thing twice:
void main() {
char* s = new char[10];
delete s;
char* p = new char[10];
delete []p;
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
I stand completely corrected. I was confused with the change from 'delete [n] array' to 'delete [] array'. And I was lucky in the example I gave, because the difference between 'delete [] array' and 'delete array' is that in the latter case no destructors are called while in the former they are. But in my example I was silly enough to use char's, who, obviously, have no destructors at all.
|
|
|
|
|
If that's window objects such like GDI handles, this article [^](and tool) may help you.
MS quote (http://www.microsoft.com/ddk) : As of September 30, 2002, the Microsoft® Windows® 2000 DDK, the Microsoft Windows 98 DDK, and the Microsoft Windows NT® 4.0 DDK will no longer be available for purchase or download on this site.
|
|
|
|
|
this is one way to cause a memory leak.. another way is to serialize an object array which creates the objects using the word new, and does this everytime the file is loaded.. before serializing an object array you should delete everything in it before loading the objects into it again.. these are a few ways to have memory leaks.
-dz
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all,
Got a class (Y) with a CMapStringToOb member which stores my own class X.
X has appropriate DECLARE_SERIAL(X), IMPLEMENT_SERIAL(X, CObject, 1)
and Serialize (CArchive&) macros/member function. When I call Serialize
on class Y which in turn tries to Serialize the map member, I get an
access violation.
Anybody got any suggestions, been browsing the forums and other
relevant sites, not found anything as yet.
BTW, class Y also has correct DECLARE/IMPLEMENT macros.
MTIA.
Chris.
|
|
|
|
|
I think that container classes like CMap require helper functions for things like serialisation. Look it up on MSDN.
Asim Hussain
e: asim@jawache.net
w: www.jawache.net
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
