|
DirectShow SDK is now not part of new DirectX SDK, u may find it in DirectX 9 SDK, it is now moved to platform SDK.
see this DirectShow 9.0[^]
|
|
|
|
|
so what needs to be done with the DirectX 10 that i have installed?? it say that To get the latest DirectShow SDK, download the latest version of the Windows SDK.
when i try to search with Windows SDK i am not getting the right downloadable.
|
|
|
|
|
search for platform SDK, may be this useful PSDK[^]
Chandrasekharanp wrote: so what needs to be done with the DirectX 10 that i have installed?
Direct Show requires DirectX Runtime only, DXSDK is not required if u have DSHOW SDK. if u bother about disk space u can remove DXSDK.
|
|
|
|
|
dear all
how to use Gaussion function to generate different image according to different k value? and also how to multiply with another image value f(x)? anyone has such code and let me make a refference. thanks a lot.
how the gaussion function convolute another one function, this is my first time to do this, so difficult, anyone give me suggestion and who can provide such code is better, thanks
Li Zhiyuan
modified on Tuesday, February 19, 2008 11:22 PM
|
|
|
|
|
li zhiyuan wrote: how to use Gaussion function to generate different image according to different k value?
AFAIK the Gaussian is a function depending on a variable, say x, and two parameters, say Xmean and Sigma.
I don't see any k in the above definition hence, I cannot understand your requirements. Maybe you have to further detail your problem.
Regarding the image generation: What kind of image do you need to generate?
What is image definition? Is it a curve depending on Gaussian values?
I think you'll need to explain more more clearly your problem.
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
|
|
|
|
|
thanks, my problem is how to blur a image, it is a 2D digital image. like f(x,y).
by the way
A[(-1,-1),(0,-1),(1,-1);(-1,0),(0,0),(1,0);(-1,1),(0,1),(1,1)]
how to denote this array by for loop in my code? thanks
Li Zhiyuan
modified on Wednesday, February 20, 2008 7:17 AM
|
|
|
|
|
li zhiyuan wrote: thanks, my problem is how to blur a image, it is a 2D digital image. like f(x,y).
Typing blur in CP search engine make magical things happen [^].
li zhiyuan wrote: by the way
A[(-1,-1),(0,-1),(1,-1);(-1,0),(0,0),(1,0);(-1,1),(0,1),(1,1)]
Do you mean
int A[][3][2]={{{-1,-1},{0,-1},{1,-1}},{{-1,0},{0,0},{1,0}},{{-1,1},{0,1},{1,1}}}; ?
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
|
|
|
|
|
I take full responsability on my "noobness" concerning threads.
I have been reading a lot of Newcomer's comments and tips (http://www.flounder.com[^]) and a lot of other places, books, and I still got a few question.
If I create a UI thread like this (in a simple dialog based application (in the OnInitDialog) ) :
m_pMyThread = new MyThread(this);
m_pMyThread->CreateThread(CREATE_SUSPENDED);
m_pMyThread->m_bAutoDelete = false;
m_pMyThread->ResumeThread();
And in my thread class, OnPlay and OnStop and thread messages called from my UI (with registered messages), the PostMessageW in the loop is to update a CStatic in the dialog:
ON_REGISTERED_THREAD_MESSAGE(WM_PLAY_THREAD_MESSAGE, OnPlay)
ON_REGISTERED_THREAD_MESSAGE(WM_STOP_THREAD_MESSAGE, OnStop)
void MyThread::OnPlay(WPARAM wParam, LPARAM lparam)
{
m_bRunning = true;
int i = 0;
while( m_bRunning)
{
m_pParent->PostMessageW( WM_THREAD_PLAYING_MESSAGE, (WPARAM) i, 0 );
Sleep(500);
i++;
}
TRACE("MyThread::OnPlay\n");
}
void MyThread::OnStop(WPARAM wParam, LPARAM lparam)
{
TRACE("MyThread::OnStop\n");
m_bRunning = false;
}
This (above) obviously does not work since the loop in OnPlay is "blocking" the thread messaging. If I do not loop in OnPlay, the OnStop message is handled properly.
I also tried this, and it does not work either:
m_pMyThread->PostThreadMessage(WM_QUIT, 0, 0);
So, What is the way to to stop the loop from my UI ? I tried adding a PeekMessage/TranslateMessage/DispatchMessage check in my loop to see if it would catch the message.
I cannot send a message to the thread.
Is modifying the m_bRunning with a direct call the preferred way ? like :
m_pMyThread->m_bRunning = false;
Thanks for any info tips and hints.
Max.
|
|
|
|
|
Maximilien wrote: Is modifying the m_bRunning with a direct call the preferred way ?
In this case, yes. To make the interface cleaner (instead of the inconsistent
post a message to start, set a variable to stop) you could add two public methods
to your thread class - Play() and Stop(). In Play(), post your WM_PLAY_THREAD_MESSAGE,
and in Stop(), you can set your running flag. That makes the thread control interface nice
and clean to the outside world.
Just my 2 cents - IMO, beyond the learning experience, the implementation is overkill...
a simple timer at 500ms intervals would make a much cleaner solution, without the need
for the secondary thread. Periodic timers are made for what you're doing there
Mark
Mark Salsbery
Microsoft MVP - Visual C++
![Java | [Coffee]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/coffee.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Mark.
Using a thread in our application will probably be overkill and not necessary, but I'm using the opportunity to learn a little bit on the side; Thread is one of the things I never really coded (was done by other people before).
BTW, the Sleep will not be in the final code! I will replace that with real functional code.
Still learning.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
- I use VC++ 6.0 in Win2k. I want built app to communication through USB port. How to start ?
Quang,
|
|
|
|
|
|
I have a CDialogBar which has a few CButton objects in it. Each CButton object contains an icon (no text) and I'd like them to appear like the buttons in a CToolBar do (flat, not raised, until the mouse hovers over the button). I used Spy++ to look at the button styles of the buttons in the tool bar, but only the tool bar has a hwnd - none of the buttons do, so it looks like the tool bar might be owner-drawing the buttons itself.
Is there a known set of button styles/window styles that one can set a CButton to and get it to appear like a button within a CToolBar does?
I can always look and see if someone has built an owner drawn CButton class which emulates a CToolBar button, but if this functionality is already built into the system then I'd rather use what's already here.
Thanks,
Jeff
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hay hi Guys
i have a single processor in my system and in my application i create more then 1 thread, so does it enhance my application, as at a given point of time only instruction can be executed, how does it make difference, does it speed up my application,
for example
i am retrieving 500 web logs from a site,
so if i create 10 threads in one go and in each thread i retrieve 1 log
i have to make 50 calls at go which will fetch those 500 logs,
so will it speed up the downloading or fetching up the logs
or should i go with application thread which will fetch 1 by 1,
which method will be useful...........
or any idea or implimentaion idea..........
i am not concerned about the server bandwidth or speed of my processor, my Question is doing the repetitive work in one thread at a time with multiple time is faster or doing it in multiple threads is faster . P.S. not concerned about UI too
thread t{ print 1;} /1st time
..
thread t{ print 1;}/100th time
OR
thread {t0,t1,t2,t3,t4,t5,t6,t7,t8,t9}{print 1;}/1st 10 run
..
thread {t0,t1,t2,t3,t4,t5,t6,t7,t8,t9}{print 1;}/last 10run=100
which will complete faster
Thanks
Swarup
modified on Tuesday, February 19, 2008 5:12 PM
|
|
|
|
|
It can helps if you need to have your application front-end no locked up because of some code.
for example, you have a UI that launch your log fetching thing, if you do that in a loop (in the default single thread), the UI will be locked until the loop is over.
But if you start the fetching thing in a different thread, then your UI will still be alive.
When you are dealing with concurrent connection, theoretically yes, it can increase the performance, but in practice, you will have some limitations due to the number of connections allowed, the bottleneck of your connection speed, ...
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you, but i am nt concerned bout UI part, becas i am handling UI in dif thread, i agree about UI, But what i am talking is, executing 100 threads is better or executing 1 thread is better.
example
1 thread called 100 times to do the same work (same work each time) OR
10 threas called 10 times to do the same work (same work each time), which method is faster, which method will complete faster, thats wht i am asking.............
Thanks again for ur reply......
thread t{ print 1;} /1st time
..
thread t{ print 1;}/100th time
OR
thread {t0,t1,t2,t3,t4,t5,t6,t7,t8,t9}{print 1;}/1st 10 run
..
thread {t0,t1,t2,t3,t4,t5,t6,t7,t8,t9}{print 1;}/last 10run=100
which will complete faster
Swarup
|
|
|
|
|
swarup wrote: is, executing 100 threads is better or executing 1 thread is better.
That depends on what each thread is doing.
swarup wrote: 1 thread called 100 times to do the same work (same work each time) OR
10 threas called 10 times to do the same work (same work each time), which method is faster, which method will complete faster
Neither will be faster than the other. On a single processor system, executing the same code 100 times, no matter how many threads you use to run the code will not execute any faster. If the code is 1,000 instructions, start-to-finish, the processor has to execute 1,000,000 instructions to get the job done. Since a single proc can only execute one instruction at a time, it doesn't matter how many threads you use, it's still 1,000,000 instructions to execute, one at a time.
Now, if you have multiple processors, the CPU can start executing more than one instruction at the same time. The process CAN run faster, but in no way is this guaranteed. It depends on what this code, that your executing 100 times, is doing and how it affects the CPU, memory controller, caching, I/O, ..., ...
swarup wrote: thread t{ print 1;} /1st time
..
thread t{ print 1;}/100th time
OR
thread {t0,t1,t2,t3,t4,t5,t6,t7,t8,t9}{print 1;}/1st 10 run
..
thread {t0,t1,t2,t3,t4,t5,t6,t7,t8,t9}{print 1;}/last 10run=100
which will complete faster
On a single core CPU, neither. You seem to have the misconception in your head that more threads = faster performance. Nothing could be further from the truth. Threading is a logical division of work, not a replacement for faster processing.
|
|
|
|
|
That depends entirely on the Server you are requesting from. If any of those requests will block at the same time that others won't then threads or even Overlapped I/O can, if done reasonably, reduce the total time to receive all 500 items.
led mike
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks a lot,
i am not concerned about the server bandwidth or speed of my processor, my Question is doing the repetative work in one thread multiple time is faster or doing it in multiple threads is faster . P.S. not concerned about UI too
|
|
|
|
|
swarup wrote: i am not concerned about the server bandwidth
swarup wrote: my Question is doing the repetative work in one thread multiple time is faster or doing it in multiple threads is faster
Let me try to make my point a different way. If you had to do the same thing but all 500 files were on your local hard drive you would likely slow down overall processing by using more than a single thread to open and read the files into memory. Would it be measurable? Likely? Noticeable? Don't know.
This is why the only thing that matters significantly is the Server. Of course if you can't depend on Server response being consistent at the various times you will be doing this you would have to develop algorithms to modify the approach dynamically based on Server response.
So now what are you going to do?
led mike
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Mike
No i dont think so,
take a scenario::
<br />
main()<br />
{<br />
thread t;<br />
for(i 0 to 100)<br />
{time = t.callme();}<br />
thread t[10];<br />
for(i 0 to 10)<br />
{t[i].callme();}<br />
loop another 10 times more<br />
}<br />
<br />
callme()<br />
{<br />
u called me,finished in 1 sec;}<br />
thanks
Swarup
|
|
|
|
|
swarup wrote: No i dont think so,
Whatever, I'm done.
led mike
|
|
|
|
|
swarup wrote: ...so does it enhance my application...
Highly doubtful, since all of the context switching would slow it down.
"Normal is getting dressed in clothes that you buy for work and driving through traffic in a car that you are still paying for, in order to get to the job you need to pay for the clothes and the car and the house you leave vacant all day so you can afford to live in it." - Ellen Goodman
"To have a respect for ourselves guides our morals; to have deference for others governs our manners." - Laurence Sterne
|
|
|
|
|
It really depends on what you are doing in the threads. Take your example, you have 100 log files to retrieve and process. Perhaps the time to retrieve a single log file would be about 0.5 seconds, then you do some processing, perhaps search a database, which may take anywhere between 0.1 and 10 seconds, then yes, using several threads would increase the speed. In this case, while one thread does a ten second search, another thread may complete 10 1 second searches.
But, if the time is pretty much standard for each log file, then as David Crow said, the constant switching between threads will take away any performance gain.
Waldermort
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
