C / C++ / MFC

chandu004 wrote:

i had to struggle for two days to find out that taborder is the reason for the controls that are invisible.

youbo wrote:

the number of middle.

youbo wrote:

my code is follow

void swap(int &a,int &b);<br />
void main()<br />
{<br />
   int array_size=0,k,m,j;<br />
<br />
<br />
   cin>>array_size;<br />
   if(array_size < 1)<br />
      return;<br />
   int*p=new int[array_size];<br />
   for(int i=0;i<array_size;i++)<br />
   {<br />
      cin>>p[i];<br />
   }<br />
   // Lets do a bubble sort<br />
   bool changed = true;<br />
   int bubble_end = array_size - 1;<br />
   while(changed)<br />
   {<br />
      changed = false;<br />
      for(int i=0;i<bubble_end;i++)<br />
      {<br />
         if(p[i] > p[i+1])<br />
         {<br />
            swap(p[i],p[i+1]);<br />
            changed = true;<br />
         }<br />
      }<br />
   }<br />
   if(array_size > 1)<br />
   {<br />
      if(array_size%2==1)<br />
         cout<<p[array_size/2+1];<br />
      else cout<<p[array_size/2]<<p[array_size/2+1];<br />
   }<br />
   else<br />
      cout<<p[0];<br />
<br />
}<br />
void swap(int &a,int &b)<br />
{<br />
   int c;<br />
   c=a;<br />
   a=b;<br />
   b=c;<br />
}

void main()<br />
{<br />
int n=0,k,m,j;<br />
//n is Zero so you declare an array of zero size !<br />
int*p=new int[n];<br />
// To late you update the value of n<br />
cin>>n;<br />
k=n;<br />
j=n;<br />
m=n;<br />
for(;n>0;n--)<br />
{<br />
cin>>p[n-1];<br />
}<br />
int x=1;<br />
while(x)<br />
{<br />
x=0;<br />
for(;k>0;k--)<br />
{<br />
// This syntax is just wrong try to understand rather than just getting it to compile<br />
if(p[k-1] {<br />
swap(p[k-1],p[k]);<br />
x=1;<br />
<br />
}<br />
<br />
}<br />
}<br />
// What if only one element is enter opps were off the end of the array<br />
if(m%2==1){cout<<p[j/2+1];}<br />
else cout<<p[j/2]<<p[j/2+1];<br />
//cout<<p[m/2+j%2]<<endl;<br />
<br />
}<br />
void swap(int &a,int &b)<br />
{int c;<br />
c=a;<br />
a=b;<br />
b=c;}

Instrument *instObject = (Instrument*) treeCtrl->GetItemData(hItem);

--Mike--
Visual C++ MVP
LINKS~! Ericahist | PimpFish | CP SearchBar v3.0 | C++ Forum FAQ

"That's what's great about doing user interface work. No matter what you do, people will say that what you did was idiotic." -- Raymond Chen

Budric B. wrote:

To my surprise new operator does not return NULL on error. It seems to throw an exception. When did this happen?

In Visual C++ 2005, the C Runtime Library's new function will also throw a std::bad_alloc
exception if the memory allocation fails.

If you still want the non-throwing version of new for the C Runtime Library, link your program
with nothrownew.obj. However, when you link with nothrownew.obj, new in the Standard C++
Library will no longer function."

Budric B. wrote:

2. Is new a thread safe operator?

Mark Salsbery
Microsoft MVP - Visual C++

Budric B. wrote:

1. To my surprise new operator does not return NULL on error. It seems to throw an exception. When did this happen? What's the exception object? I'm using VS 8.

Budric B. wrote:

2. Is new a thread safe operator? What if I'm using some libraries that most likely use malloc. Is memory allocation still thread safe? I'm using dynamic link run time for my program and hopefully all the libraries. If some library is using a different run-time but I don't free its memory is that fine?

Budric B. wrote:

3. What is the memory allocation limit for a process in Windows XP? Is it 2 GB? Or RAM + swap space?

Budric B. wrote:

4. Any free GUI profilers out there?