|
jana_hus wrote: Am I wrong? No, you are not.
Still... there is a lot of times where the poster gives the impression of not having done efford with the issue or even writing the question. I am not telling your case is this case, only that, for me that's a perfectly valid situation to answer with it.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
jana_hus wrote: it would not make any difference anyway. So stop whining and move on.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
I can't speak for everyone else, but IMO the problem is... you refused to stop asking programming questions the lounge and you don't construct posts coherently. I'm not sure if English is your native language or not (says you live in the US on your profile), but if people can't make heads or tails out of your posts without needing a cryptogram decoder, it generally doesn't end well.
And I'm not saying there's no merit to wishing for a better quality of replies to questions. But certainly, two wrongs don't make a right. That doesn't mean you can't do better at articulating your questions.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
no , I am not native English person
and (if you read) the forum rules they are pretty explicit , clear about how to respond to apparently non English speaking person. And furthermore - there is something in "rules" to help and not to make the poster feel stupid...( it may be OK for you to accept "Google it" , but if that is THE ONLY reply I keep getting from specific "contributor" it makes me feel stupid and unwelcome )
But you comment is in-line with "it is users fault", hence the introduction was , IMHO, just
" empty filler ".
But is it your choise , style to post and my reaction ,reply to it should be my choice
and OK.
(But from my experience here it is risky for me ti post this)
"
|
|
|
|
|
Seems to me you enjoy arguing with those who could help. I have read the rules and you are correct about being patient with non-native English speakers, but your incoherency has less to do with your English and more to do with lack of effort. That's why you get "google it" answers. You put zero effort into the question.
ALSO YOUR ATTITUDE COMES ACROSS EASY. I can't imagine ever working with some as argumentative as you. SO... YA KNOW... MAYBE YOU SHOULD LISTEN TO WHAT I'M SAYING.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
You are native english speaker and sometimes I do not understand what you write either
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
TouchΓ©
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Can I use "DuckDuckGo it"?
|
|
|
|
|
NO, you MAY get banned...
|
|
|
|
|
Retro camera[^]
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, but it's a very robust retro camera.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
Strictly speaking, you may argue whether it is a 'camera (obscura)' at all.
Where is the black room where you cannot see anything? The 'hidden chamber'?
The very most you can say about today's electronic cameras with live viewing, picked up from the same sensor that is used when preserving an image is that the entrance (through the lens) has black walls, to minimize reflections and stray light. There is no chamber where everything is obscure due to lack of light.
Religious freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make five.
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 1,177 4/6*
π¨π©β¬β¬β¬
β¬π©π©π¨β¬
β¬π©π©β¬π©
π©π©π©π©π©
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
β¬π©π©π¨β¬
β¬π©π©β¬π©
π©π©π©π©π©
In a closed society where everybody's guilty, the only crime is getting caught. In a world of thieves, the only final sin is stupidity. - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 1,177 4/6*
π¨β¬β¬π¨β¬
β¬β¬π©π¨β¬
π©π©π©β¬π©
π©π©π©π©π©
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 1,177 5/6
π¨π¨β¬π¨β¬
β¬π¨π¨π¨β¬
β¬β¬π©π¨π¨
π©π©π©β¬π©
π©π©π©π©π©
Ok, I have had my coffee, so you can all come out now!
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 1,177 5/6
β¬π¨β¬β¬β¬
π¨β¬β¬β¬β¬
β¬β¬π©π¨π¨
π©π©π©β¬π©
π©π©π©π©π©
Within you lies the power for good - Use it!
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 1,177 4/6
β¬β¬π©β¬β¬
β¬β¬π©β¬β¬
β¬π©π©π©π©
π©π©π©π©π©
"A little time, a little trouble, your better day"
Badfinger
|
|
|
|
|
It seems impossible to get a fraction with more than 10 in the denominator from these fonts. Certainly someone has produced such a font.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I don't have a specific recommendation but I go to fontsquirrel.com to get my fonts.
Check out my IoT graphics library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx
And my IoT UI/User Experience library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/uix
|
|
|
|
|
Do the fractions you want exist in Unicode? I would think that if not, then no font will have them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
For really complicated math things, I use Latex and embed the generated PDF extract into my Word doc.
|
|
|
|
|
Are you using Unicode?
If so, there is a set of codepoints for the most common fractions: β β
β
β
β
β
β
ΒΌ β
Β½ β
β
β
β
ΒΎ β
β
β
β
But Unicode also has the possibility of using super and subscript making it possible to create any fraction, such as Β²Β³Β³βββ
β.
There are several generators on the net, for example: Unicode Fraction Converter
|
|
|
|