|
A modern 8 bit design, built using 1950s thermionic valves that glow and heat the entire room. Feel the burn of power!
Why bother with baseboard heaters? They can't calculate the Fibonacci sequence
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: They can't calculate the Fibonacci sequence or mining bitcoins
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Here's an idea... Say you did do exactly that... you mined a coin in a very novel way.
Since they are uniquely identifiable, you'd in a way be creating a kind of crypto-art.
That is, your coins may actually be worth more kinda like real coin misprints and such can command more than face value.
"Yes, but these coins were mined with an array of valves."
Proof of authenticity is hairy, but still.
|
|
|
|
|
Russian hackers who broke into Microsoft's systems and spied on staff inboxes earlier this year also stole emails from its customers, the tech giant said on Thursday, around six months after it first disclosed the intrusion. That's Microsoft's job
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: Russian hackers who broke into Microsoft's systems They must have used Linux, otherwise MS would have immediately known about them.
|
|
|
|
|
Any hacker who reads my emails would probably die of boredom.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
Article wrote: the tech giant said on Thursday, around six months after it first disclosed the intrusion. And what the have they done with the additional 5 Months and 3 Weeks?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
The decision to withhold Apple Intelligence from EU countries amounts to a “stunning open declaration” of anticompetitive behavior, according to the bloc’s vice-president and competition regulator Margrethe Vestager. They were looking forward to suing Apple for anti-competitive behavior for shipping Apple Intelligence
|
|
|
|
|
"We decided not to compete in this market."
"That is anti-competitive!"
"What?"
|
|
|
|
|
"If you don't compete in this market then who will WE compete against?"
I’ve given up trying to be calm. However, I am open to feeling slightly less agitated.
I’m begging you for the benefit of everyone, don’t be STUPID.
|
|
|
|
|
The list of withheld new "features" is telling as two of them are aimed specifically at the Apple market as Android has had screenshare and mirroring for a while. This sounds more like Apple is throwing a fit instead.
|
|
|
|
|
In other news, the EU parliament passes a law allowing forced sales in the EU of any product elsewhere, under penalty of law.
I forsee that the next step will be Apple leaving the EU market completely.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel Pfeffer wrote: I forsee that the next step will be Apple leaving the EU market completely. Probably...
They should try the same with META.
I might probably miss Apple, but I would definitivelly not miss the other
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
DevOps, like many trendy technology terms, has gone from the peak of optimism to the depths of exhaustion. It's not dead, it's just busy in a Scrum meeting
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: It's not dead, it's just busy in a Scrum meeting And having some more scheduled due to agile...
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Don't look now, but the era of low-code/no-code development may be passing us by faster than we ever dreamt it would. Have no fear. Someone will re-re-re-re-invent it shortly
|
|
|
|
|
Model based development is going forward quite excellently though.
GCS/GE d--(d) s-/+ a C+++ U+++ P-- L+@ E-- W+++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
The shortest horror story: On Error Resume Next
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: but the era of low-code/no-code development may be passing us by faster than we ever dreamt it would. Got shadowed by LLM era
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
MoonBit is an end-to-end programming language that’s optimized for WebAssembly, while also compiling to JavaScript and Assembly code. For those who always wanted to moon their code
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: MoonBit is an end-to-end programming language that’s optimized for WebAssembly, while also compiling to JavaScript and Assembly code. Someone to tell them that when trying to do a lot at once results not always go good... (see windows 8)
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Brooks thinks it’s impressive technology, but maybe not quite as capable as many are suggesting. I'm sure his stuff is more important
|
|
|
|
|
Article wrote: Brooks thinks it’s impressive technology, but maybe not quite as capable as many are suggesting. Is that not what we are saying since ChatGPT v1?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
But no one listens to us (or at least me)
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Microsoft is making a big push to publicize its new .NET Aspire tech stack for streamlining the development of .NET cloud-native services. The 'embrace' phase of 'Embrace, Extend, Extinguish'
Or the lock-in part, I don't judge (much)
|
|
|
|
|
Research model catches bugs in AI-generated code, improving human oversight of AI. Hey! I thought criticizing ChatGPT was my job!
|
|
|
|