|
But I only run Windows to use WSL! /s
|
|
|
|
|
60 times versus linux...
either there is a lot more people using linux than before, or linux was not so secure as promised.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
For decades, we've asked ourselves "Can it run Doom?". Now we can finally make the ultimate punchline: "Can Doom run it?" Soon we will know the answer to the ultimate question - can we run Doom in Doom?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: we've asked ourselves "Can it run Doom?" We have asked?
There is people that managed to run it in the most unbelieable places I could think of (and many totally unexpected)
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Queryable encryption, WASM goes mainstream, and a tighter job market Just like in 2022, but with jetpacks!
|
|
|
|
|
As an old user said:
This is going to make such a difference in my life... (or something similar)
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Microsoft partnered with a company called Portable Computer Support Group to produce the Mach 20, released in 1987. Bob is happy to keep out of the history books on this one
"A total of eleven copies of “OS/2 for Mach 20” were ever sold, and eight of them were returned."
|
|
|
|
|
Linux as a primary operating system had been steadily climbing for the past 5 years. Well, that's done. Now we can start predicting The Year of Plan 9
|
|
|
|
|
I should have read from bottom up, this could answer my doubt above...
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Seriously? Is this meant as Joke Of The Year?
As long as we ignore desktop users, and limit the survey to software developers - sure!
A survey among truck drivers show that the number of vehicles running on diesel far outnumber those running on regular gasoline, right?
|
|
|
|
|
The system takes 28 minutes to boot up but it can multitask. I'm pretty sure 'runs' isn't the right word
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Nanofrazor" cuts tiny single with first 25 seconds of “Rocking Around the Christmas Tree” 33 or 45?
or 78, for that full retro sound?
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: 33 or 45? 42
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
The latest version of Stardock's WindowBlinds 11 allows you to make your PC look as if it's running Windows 95. In case you need something to start you up
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: "Arguably the most incredibly dumb feature of Start11 is the ability to change the Windows 10 start menu to one that looks almost identical to Windows 11's." Fixed. Also, only top and bottom positions available, so it can't fully mimic Win 95.
|
|
|
|
|
The conventional wisdom that’s been handed down around software design is more about following a set of rules and best practices than reducing complexity. One day, John Frum will fix all our code
Not a new article, but new to me.
|
|
|
|
|
He points out the difference between a novice programmer and an experienced programmer. The novice will follow the "rules" without thinking about whether or not they're applicable.
|
|
|
|
|
He also says, rephrasing a book about plain writing:
Quote: Rewriting is the essence of programming. So true, but many fail to do it once the code works. Rewriting will probably break something, and the thought of having to debug it again is oh so painful.
|
|
|
|
|
Explain to me why I thought of Clutch Cargo[^] when I read the thread title.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
The Zero Day Initiative originally rated this Linux 5.15 in-kernel SMB server, ksmbd, bug a perfectly awful 10. It's The Year of Linux hacking!
|
|
|
|
|
This year, 2022 marks the 60th anniversary of that fateful day in 1962 when a 24-year-old Donald Knuth started writing “The Art of Computer Programming.” "I think that I shall never see a poem lovely as a tree."
Or even a hash.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, I watched a few minutes of the lecture.
Then I went out and looked at the first 3 pages of Volume 1.
About the same as I've done for the last 20 years or so.
And somehow I still don't have vast knowledge of algorithms!!
I supposed I just need some more work with HTML, JavaScript & CSS and I'll understand the things that Knuth talks about. 
|
|
|
|