|
It's not as if the model rocketeers didn't get some serious help. The SBC that flies your everyday drone is available for purchase.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
So what? Even with the SBC it still took a lot of time and effort to make this work.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the cutting into the joke. That's a pretty nice bit. Haven't even got to the article yet, but that's pretty self-explanatory.
Edit: What?! This dude's name is Aryan? Oh, I suppose that's maybe partly how we get to Wernher.
|
|
|
|
|
UTM SE can ‘run classic software and old-school games’ for Windows, Mac OS 9, and Linux on your iPhone. Because Candy Crush is better in the original ASCII
|
|
|
|
|
And now the devil chases its own tail.
|
|
|
|
|
Tech companies will have until August 2nd, 2026, to comply with new EU rules for AI around copyright, transparency, and uses like predictive policing. New fines incoming
If it's anything like GDPR compliance, you'd better start soon
|
|
|
|
|
As long as the fines do not really hurt...
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: predictive policing.
Do they mean like in Minority Report?
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
Without the third (minority) vote, probably. Just "we think you might do something bad one day". 
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Yes. I was curious about that too.
(from Google)
"The law also prohibits the use of AI for predictive policing based on profiling and systems that use biometric data to categorise people according to specific categories such as race, religion, or sexual orientation."
You know, other than not being able to spell some words like categorize and color, they smash the nail pretty squarely on the regular and in fairness it probably should be Aluminium.
|
|
|
|
|
Some of the best and brightest work in open source. Who are these people? How did they get there? Where do they see open source going next? It's the cookies
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: It's the cookies
Or the eyes[^]?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Whether you’re at a consultancy or a product company, from development to management, you have a hidden superpower: saying no "Tell her no no no no no-no-no-no"
Yes, I had to look it up to get the right number of no's in there
|
|
|
|
|
And if 'No' isn't powerful enough, you can try it's bigger brother: 'F*** You!'  
|
|
|
|
|
dot ai dot dot
Edit: for those who don't get it: .i..
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
modified 15-Jul-24 16:37pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Say no to implementations, yes to accommodations.
|
|
|
|
|
We need that on an inspiration poster or bumper sticker
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Goldman Sachs is asking if we will ever recoup the the billions of dollars we invested in AI. And they know "expensive and unreliable"
|
|
|
|
|
Should we wait a bit more before shouting: SURPRISE! ?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
You may be wondering by now what "free threading" or "free-threaded CPython" is, and why you should care But you're still not free to whitespace as you desire
|
|
|
|
|
another example of "only because you can..."?
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
"Why? Performance. Multi-threaded performance. It makes it significantly easier to write code that efficiently runs in parallel and will utilize multiple CPU cores effectively. The core counts in modern CPUs continue to grow, while clock speeds do not grow, so multi-threaded performance will continue to grow in importance."
I don't think we're quite "there yet" but I can foresee also a potential benefit of cutting the memory footprint so you could maybe throw the interpreter onto the VRAM.
|
|
|
|
|
Threat actors are quick to weaponize available proof-of-concept (PoC) exploits in actual attacks, sometimes as quickly as 22 minutes after exploits are made publicly available. They'd have done it sooner, but they were busy with all the other attacks
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks a lot, security researchers. 
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Offense or defense?
Yes.
Heh.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
