|
Kent Sharkey wrote: I'd add a joke here, but I don't understand cricket well enough
Oh Crickets! Another language to learn and to argue with management as to why it shouldn't be used!
Which just goes to prove that you don't need to understand something to tell management "NO!" 
|
|
|
|
|
All non-Google chat GPTs affected by side channel that leaks responses sent to users. Loose bits sink ships
I decided not to go with the rhyme on that one
|
|
|
|
|
why does it not surprise me? 
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Average teams aim at 100% Code Coverage just to reach the number. Great teams don’t. Why? Uncovering the answer
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: Great teams don’t. Why?
Because it's kinda silly to test getters and setters and such?
I’ve given up trying to be calm. However, I am open to feeling slightly less agitated.
I’m begging you for the benefit of everyone, don’t be STUPID.
|
|
|
|
|
Code coverage is like trying to get to the speed of light. The more code coverage you have, the more massive your code. At some point, the energy required to go the next 0.00001% of coverage becomes impossible because the mass of code is so close to infinite. 
Not to mention the whole time dilation effect, where your tests are obsoleting faster and faster as other coders make changes. Something like that. 
|
|
|
|
|
OK, I get your point.
But then, testing shouldn't go by the code lines, but what those code lines do. There should be no reason to change/update a test because the code is changed - only when what the code is supposed to do changes.
Tests should be developed and implemented by people who know nothing of the code. They should make tests for all the functionality, regardless of the lines of code to implement it. If some code is not run during a complete test, it either indicates that the code is dead and can be removed, or that there is some functionality that the test developers never were told about. Maybe the developer didn't tell anybody about this functionality - which is really bad. Secret, undocumented, untested functionality is bad for any software.
So don't strive for 100% code coverage. Strive for 100% functionality coverage. If that doesn't lead to 100% code coverage, you should take a close look at the code and ask: What the elephant is that code there for?
Religious freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make five.
|
|
|
|
|
According to Google, the move should block 25 percent more phishing attempts. *Actual protection may vary. Results not guaranteed. Consult your IT staff to see if Chrome is right for you.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: Google says Chrome can now protect you better while preserving your privacy in their servers
FTFH
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
If you're serious about privacy, Chrome is never for you.
|
|
|
|
|
Tesla's Optimus is taking baby steps while OpenAI's Figure 01 is doing burnouts on the track. I, for one, welcome our new apple-passing, dish-stacking, uh, robotic overlords
|
|
|
|
|
Spooner... where is he when we need him?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Adopting AI is a major focus for many modern enterprises, but that trend may look different in 2026. People will get tired of hearing about it?
Present company included, at least
|
|
|
|
|
Once again Gartner raises concerns that are already being discussed (and slaps themselves on the back for being profound. Next up, to be or not to be...)
|
|
|
|
|
Joe Woodbury wrote: to be or not to be...
You are not telling about combining AIU with Quantum computing... are you? are you?  
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Mmmm yeah agree, Terminator jumps to mind IF we see 2026 at all - me being the doomsday Sayer.
|
|
|
|
|
Even well-planned, well-funded projects tend to fail. An abbreviated list
|
|
|
|
|
He forgot "irrational expectations"
and "it was a dumb idea"
|
|
|
|
|
And "do it like this, I know better" from someone mightier than the dev
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Because tests are only as good as the code they test?
ok, while that sounds wise for about 2 seconds, it doesn't even make sense to me.
I think I replied to the wrong post, but the two seem related.
modified 16-Mar-24 14:51pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Vadim Kravcenko wrote: Even well-planned
But that is waterfall thinking. We all know that is bad and leads to all sorts of failures. Successful projects are agile, they start with
int main(int argc, char**argv)
{
return 0;
}After that, we start making questions about the the problem to be solved, and work that into our solution as we go. Any sort of planning reduces flexibility and must be avoided
Religious freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make five.
|
|
|
|
|
COPA took Wright to court to try and prevent him from suing developers and other members of the crypto community, claiming intellectual property rights over Bitcoin's technology. This is why you sign your code
Or at the very least keep a dated copy of the backup. Maybe put it on the friggin' bitcoin blockchain if you want to be like that.
|
|
|
|
|
Or best... use a notary
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
If you’ve been thinking of infusing your existing .NET apps with generative AI & Large Language Models (LLMs), now is a great time to dive in and we have new quickstarts to help you out.
|
|
|
|
|
Oh no! As if it were not enough with the "AI's" done by professionals...
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
