|
Truer words have not been spoken. and
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Are we nothing?
- Volcanoes and Meteors
|
|
|
|
|
"So you're saying there's a chance!" - Lloyd Christmas
I’ve given up trying to be calm. However, I am open to feeling slightly less agitated.
I’m begging you for the benefit of everyone, don’t be STUPID.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, we already know of one planet where all life is artificial - Mars.
|
|
|
|
|
Ssshhh! It will have life (briefly) just as soon as we can get Elon there...
|
|
|
|
|
David O'Neil wrote: Ssshhh! It will have life (briefly) just as soon as we can get Elon there... Can we please send him with some company? I know some politicians / dictators / lawyers... that could do the job
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
That's a thumbsup from me for the Rush reference. Nicely played you absolute love God.
|
|
|
|
|
How I built a graphical bootable "game" for the Raspberry Pi (or any other modern computer) in C#. I don't know if I want bare metal in my raspberry pie
|
|
|
|
|
Microsoft announced a new tool as part of its Azure Migrate initiative that helps developers move their on-premises .NET apps to the Azure cloud. "Rise up, rise up! Oh, rise and share your power"
|
|
|
|
|
Most of the time, Microsoft allows users to continue using deprecated features or install them as additional components after their removal. However, this is not the case with WordPad. At least we'll always have Microsoft Write. oh, wait.
|
|
|
|
|
I actually prefer the Notepad, than the Wordpad
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
+1
I just found it handy for the occasional RTF file that I was given. Although that was mostly in my HLP editing days.
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
For that I opened in word and copy pasted it in notepad
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
You rich folk with your "installed Word"
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Word 2013 is still doing a good job. Comparing the upgrade cost from Word 2003 (if my memory is correct, there was an upgrade offer in those days), distributed over 10 years of active use, is epsilon compared to the amount of money I have spent on beer during those 10 years (and you wouldn't believe the price of beer in Norway!)
Religious freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make five.
|
|
|
|
|
Office 2010 still alive and kicking.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Copilot key will eventually be required in new PC keyboards, though not yet. I'm still waiting for my interrobang key?!
Or ‽ if your codepage and font allows
|
|
|
|
|
As long as they allow you to remap it to "Don't give a sh*t"
|
|
|
|
|
|
The "Windows" key drives me nuts; I fat-finger it more than deliberately use it.
|
|
|
|
|
The brilliant mind who discovered the spacetime solution for rotating black holes claims singularities don't physically exist. Is he right? It's actually pudding?
|
|
|
|
|
Kerr's looking at just the relativistic effects to disprove the existence of singularities. From a quantum perspective they can't exist either.
|
|
|
|
|
My theory on emergent spacetime and gravity had the same conclusion,
see here[^]. It unifies gravity with the standard model of physics at quantum level!
|
|
|
|
|
I thought that article might get your attention
So, you agree he might be on the right track? (The math was way beyond me, as well as most of the concepts)
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
I agree with the statement that "Singularities don’t exist" but perhaps for different physical reasons. Therefore I can't comment on whether or not Roy Kerr's approach is "on the right track" at present because there is a Penrose-Hawking theorem that he needs to get around which is quite technical in nature. But it is not necessary in my approach .
There are two kinds of approach to the attempts of realizing a consistent marriage between gravity and quantum mechanics: 1) treating spacetime as a fundamental physical entity as it is done in classical general relativity and main stream approach to its "quantization" including Roy Kerr's work; and 2) treating spacetime as an emergent entity from more fundamental concepts, which is what my theory had eventually accomplished in which Einstein's equation for curved spacetime was derived or emerged, together with Newton's gravitation constant G and cosmological constant Lambda, as an approximate one in which the very concept of emergent spacetime, which is a statistical entity here, inside or near a black hole becomes less clear due to larger quantum fluctuations there. There is no infinitesimally accurate spacetime entities like a classical singularity in my emergent spacetime since relativistic quantum mechanics takes over there.
|
|
|
|