|
With the blatant manipulation he has done with his crypto scheme, and Tesla, and other crap, I can't blame them. But then again, idiots have been falling for his ploys all this time, which doesn't say anything good about those idiots, either. The SECs job is to try to protect them...
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, you mean the "funding secured" tweet that caused institutional speculators to dump their Tesla stock while investors, both institutional and individual, reaped huge rewards in less than two years by holding onto their Tesla stock. The SEC has done nothing to deal with the TSLA short sellers over the years who have lost huge amount of their own and other's money, but they continue to interfere with Tesla. This by the way, is why Musk kept SpaceX private - it keeps the SEC out of SpaceX's business.
|
|
|
|
|
You are missing a bunch. It feels like this article is also missing a few, as I think there were several tesla tweets designed to manipulate its price. There was also the Saturday Night Live crypto crap...
Five times Elon Musk has affected the market
|
|
|
|
|
I did. Near immediately. Half joking, but maybe half not too.
Historical data on security tells us that most compromises happen from within.
And truly, in that sense, the facts we do know tell us that he sort of most definitely contributed?
Maybe he didn't impersonate SEC "because he could". But wanton headchopping and (did he really throw 80% of their microservices out the window one day but then auth broke and nobody could login?) and other stuff.
I'm not sure I'd call those things I respect about the guy so much as saving graces but they're solid things I think are rare and thus hold a great deal of value.
There's nothing wrong with a nice strong dose of self-righteousness... when your barometer is on point.
He's had to ignore his barometer too much. Too much pressure.
|
|
|
|
|
LOL
Plain and easy... LOL
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Let’s discuss a cool open-source C++ library that helps you write nice and clear C++ code, but with safety checks *automatically* added under the hood. Now we need something for Real safety
(that's an attempt at a math[s] joke)
|
|
|
|
|
It already exists for some types of problems - interval arithmetic.
Most current implementations are relatively slow, because they require switching the processor's rounding control twice per operation (which kills inlining on most processors), but there is no reason that processors built with interval arithmetic in mind could not be designed.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: Now we need something for Real safety For what? To cover Imaginary problems (a.k.a. that's not a bug, it's a feature...)?
Kent Sharkey wrote: (that's an attempt at a math[s] joke) Hopefully mine gets through too
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Microsoft’s object-oriented programming language for .NET development had the largest increase in popularity, gaining on Java, C++, C, and Python. VB has to remain statisfied with Miss Congeniality
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: VB has to remain statisfied with Miss Congeniality And VB6 with "fear the undead"?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Advances in AI and high-performance computing are changing the way scientists look for new battery materials. Hey ChatGPT, what's a good new battery material?
Oh, sorry. "Hey Bing..."
|
|
|
|
|
"Found", "Found out" or "made up to get more funds for further studies"?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
It’s the year of the AI PC, after all. In case you need an AI to help write your shopping list
|
|
|
|
|
Article wrote: It’s the year of the AI PC, after all. I would say: "It's the year for buzzword bingo und bullsh1t decissions, that increase exponentally the performance bottlenecks and force people to buy new hardware"
A good "hidden" strategy to force people continue buying hardware that is not really needed and roll out more market share of windows 11
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek wrote: A good "hidden" strategy to force people continue buying hardware that is not really needed and roll out more market share of windows 11
Although a number of applications have been, and are being, back-ported to Windows 10. E.g., New Outlook, Media Player, Copilot.
Kevin
|
|
|
|
|
9,388 engineers polled by Motherboard and Blind said AI will lead to less hiring. Only 6% were confident they'd get another job with the same pay. "You get a good job with more pay and you're okay"
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: AI will lead to less hiring CodeMonkeys will have it difficult, yeah.
Good Devs will still have good jobs for a while, when the consequences of using AI in production start popping out and someone is needed to clean the mess.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Could ChatGPT N (for large N) quit the game of generating code in a high-level language like Python, and produce executable machine code directly, like compilers do today? Is the correct guess, "no", or "heck no"?
Betteridge's Law of Headlines wins again
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: Is the correct guess, "no", or "heck no"? I prefer "no ing way"
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: As coding assistants become more accurate, it seems likely to assume that they will eventually stop being “assistants” and take over the job of writing code.
This just tells me the author isn't a programmer, or at least not a great one.
I just think that's the only way you make that assumption.
Granted, the companies who should definitely know that, and their CEOs... They are selling that idea to people who definitely wouldn't have any reason know better.
Edit:
I saw a post on social media criticizing some Indian guy because he posted a joke about integrating AI into something popular but where the whole joke was basically "ok guys, let's do source control, but with AI" and the entirety of the explanation was "source control + AI" (though it wasn't source control, I can't remember).
The vast majority of responses "did not get the joke" to say the least.
|
|
|
|
|
{foo}+AI! is basically the theme of this years CES. And Windows product launches.
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Wait, so he was attacking MSFT and I misread the situation?
(it's a real shame we have no lion emoji to repeat 20x)
Admitted fanboy. But I did not know anything about all that. Thanks.
It is not at all surprising though.
I am a bit ashamed I didn't figure out that context to put what I saw into it.
There would have been at least a silver lining to what I thought I was reading.
|
|
|
|
|
Fancy a Windows laptop that's also an Android tablet or a mouse and keyboard powered by kinetic energy and solar Cry 'Havoc!', and let squirt the streams of wash!
Because of course my brain stopped listening at, "voice-commanded bidet"
|
|
|
|
|
Short, handwritten lines of unrelated words contained coded weather reports to send via telegraph in the late 19th century Not even the antique dress pocket (ADP) encryption is safe anymore
|
|
|
|
|
Article wrote: contained coded weather reports And they needed such a codification that lasted until today to get it craked only for weather reports?
Either it has been wrongly "decoded" or they were not weather reports...
Did "AI" help with this?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|