|
So, from that article it appears to work just like the existing Lock statement except you have to use an object. This looks like a step backwards for simple locks.
|
|
|
|
|
I read it the other way, that currently you use an object, but soon a specific class:
Quote: Until now, we have done something like:
private readonly object _lock = new object();
…
Quote: The new Lock type is a bit more explicit about what it does:
private readonly Lock _lock = new Lock();
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Actually, C# has a Lock keyword and VB has a SyncLock keyword that does simple locking. No object needed (though I suspect one is used in the IL).
|
|
|
|
|
|
As these models become increasingly widespread, assessing their capabilities and limitations is of utmost importance. I'm sure they're just great at it
|
|
|
|
|
I went to work to explore this idea of checking if a number is odd or even by only using comparisons to see how well it works in a real world scenario. And now we finally know if 4200000001 is even or odd
|
|
|
|
|
I think this belongs in "Weird and Wonderful".
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
It's about time - samuelmarina/is-even[^] hasn't been updated since August 2021.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
2020 lawsuit accused Google of tracking incognito activity, tying it to users' profiles. In order to collect, victims will be asked to not identify themselves
|
|
|
|
|
Sure, they settle the lawsuit, but will they stop tracking incognito activity? Bet not.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
They'll probably just add a line on the 5th deep "help" page that tells you they're always watching. Something to keep the lawyers away next time.
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Where do you hide a dead body on the internet?
Page 2 of the search results.
|
|
|
|
|
The evolution of enterprise software engineering has been marked by a series of “less” shifts – from client-server to web and mobile (“client-less”), data center to cloud (“data-center-less”), and app server to serverless. Can we just skip to the end and have Nothingless?
Codeless? Lessless?
|
|
|
|
|
Serial - hope you've seen it! Contains this gem, among seemingly thousands of others. Part of it is on the preview on that page:
Martha: You-ness. Me-ness. Us-ness. We-ness.
Sam Stone: [snorts]
Martha: Your-ness. My-ness. Our-ness. Happiness.
Harvey Holroyd: [whispering] Sickness.
Kate Linville Holroyd: [whispering] Harvey!
Martha: And now, Bill, I'd like to hear where your head is at.
Bill: Thank you, Martha, for pushing my button.
Stokely: [shakes head in disbelief]
Bill: Thank you for inviting me to participate in your life, for I am an a**hole. And being an a**hole is neither good nor bad. It just is.
Reverend Spike: I think that says it all.
Harvey Holroyd: [whispering] These are exciting times, aren't they? Gas is over a dollar a gallon and it's okay to be an a**hole.
Kate Linville Holroyd: [whispering] Shh!
modified 29-Dec-23 2:58am.
|
|
|
|
|
Sounds like another solution hosted on someone else's hardware.
|
|
|
|
|
The app will support features that are available on the desktop version of the tool. Now it's the droid you were looking for?
|
|
|
|
|
'Our licenses aren't working anymore,' says free software pioneer Duh, Opener Source!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business Source Licence, surely...
|
|
|
|
|
How do we measure developer productivity, and how do we use that to improve products and the workplace? Because if you wonder what makes people happy and productive, it's LinkedIn
|
|
|
|
|
Learning is necessary for software developers. Item #0: it's a good thing
|
|
|
|
|
It would be a tangible demonstration of Einstein's famous E = mc^2 equation. "Open mind for a different view, and nothing else matters"
|
|
|
|
|
The surprising solution finally provides an answer to Euler’s famous “36 Officers” problem. It would have been solved sooner, but they had to figure out quantum entanglement first
Of course it had to be the quantums, didn't it?
|
|
|
|
|
First, we change the rules.
|
|
|
|
|
The original Sudoku prototype.
|
|
|
|